JETBeam C-LE V2 + Domain change update!

x2x3x2

Banned
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Messages
1,258
Review is up!
Also, please take note LightReviews.info is now Light-Reviews.com
Remember to update your bookmarks! :)
Please take note that emails should also be addressed to: [email protected]
 
The web site is fast now :thumbsup: I normally like your reviews a lot but, this review is confusing because you are reviewing three very alike lights with similar names and I had a hard time wrapping my old brain around it.
 
Great review!

22 hours, 48 minutes to 50% on low with a single Eneloop is pretty sweet.
 
Yup i guess you're right. I will try to split it up into a mmore cohesive review later. I just tried to get the info up (runtimes and beamshots) first so we can decide weather its worth the purchse.

Seems like the new V2 improves runtime instead of intensity...
 
Apparently some people from the China/Taiwan region were having problems accessing the site with a ".info" domain.

Changed it to a .com and now they can access it fine, and apparently faster too :)
 
I appreciate your reviews and all of the money that you spend on flashlights in order to provide us with the information we need in order to make informed purchases.
However, this review is sub-standard. It's sloppy and lazy. You say it's a twisty light, but it's not. You say the threads are awful, but they are not, etc. etc. It would be very easy for you to delete the comments that don't apply to this light. It makes you look un-professional, even though you usually go to a lot of trouble to present a professional review. Sorry for the negative feedback. I promise I won't do it again. Cheers.
 
I appreciate your reviews and all of the money that you spend on flashlights in order to provide us with the information we need in order to make informed purchases.
However, this review is sub-standard. It's sloppy and lazy. You say it's a twisty light, but it's not. You say the threads are awful, but they are not, etc. etc. It would be very easy for you to delete the comments that don't apply to this light. It makes you look un-professional, even though you usually go to a lot of trouble to present a professional review. Sorry for the negative feedback. I promise I won't do it again. Cheers.


I could see where you are confused. At the top of the review, it's says it's an update and that comments for V2 are at the end of each section. Those comments do reflect that it's now a clicky, etc. I think the conclusion, which is based on V1, could be updated to state that PWM is no longer a problem, and hasn't been since the first of the three versions.

Your first post in this thread is maybe a bit clearer since the review itself, since the bulk of the review is still on the first version.

Nice lookin' website, by the way. . .
 
Well, sorry about that. I just had to make a decision to weather to do a complete re-review which would have taken more time, or so it ASAP so people could decide weather to purchase the V2.

Yes, this review is based on assuming that you have past experience or read about the earlier reviews. However the differences at the end of each section does quickly summarize it quite clearly I think.

Btw, the PWM (although improved as in V1.2) is still an issue, to me at least. As I still do find it easily noticeable, unlike the PWM used in the LF series.

Will try to make future reviews better :)
 
Thanks for the review. they must take a lot of your time and I don't say thanks enough.:thumbsup:
 
Hey x2x3x2, since your reviews help manufacturers get more buyers, shouldn't you get like a free light from them every time you do a review? :naughty:

I love your site, it's now a good substitute ever since flashlightreviews went down. Keep up the good work :twothumbs.
 
Top