LED glare reduction strategies: use an LCD cutoff?

HOLONYAK

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
47
I realize that its not legal (&reckless) to use DIY LEDS on a car. That being said, I am interested in exploring the design of an LED system for an automotive application that could theoretically meet DOT requirements for safety and efficacy. Kids, do not try this at home.
I measured the light pattern shining from my Infiniti G37 HID projectors last night. The lens is approximately 2 feet from the pavement. The light cast at any point in front of the car is cut off at about 2 feet from the ground, so if you are approaching a hitchhiking cheerleader, all that is really illuminated well is her legs. Anything above that line is kinda dark. The pavement that is in front of the car is illuminated from some distance far away up to 9.3 feet in front of the bumper. So, a light that projects no higher than itself (2 feet) and no lower than 9.3 feet ahead is about 12 degrees. Car lights also need to cast light to the sides of the road. So, if you didnt have access to the fancy optics that the car manufacturers are using, you could approximate the same beam pattern with multiple LED units. If we could find a combination of LED and lens that completely and evenly fill a 10-14 degree cone (without significant spill outside the cone) we would be set. It is important that the light does not exceed the spread limit because it will cause glare for other drivers. Each LED unit would need to be angled to the left and right to cover the field of view. 72 degrees of light seems to be what my car produces (well kinda...my lights swivel as I turn so the field is actually much wider, so side firing LEDs could be switched on to replicate this feature). Assuming only one unit is needed per section, a single bank of 6 units at 12 degrees each on a bicycle/motorcycle would approximate what my G37 headlights illuminate when pointing forward. Since automotive applications involves 2 banks of lights, additional emitter units would need to face inward to avoid a 6 foot wide dead zone directly in front of the vehicle. for 12 degree units, the math works nicely if each side has a unit with partially redundant coverage pointing dead ahead and has an additional unit inboard covering the middle. When looking at the front of the vehicle, the angles would be:
30,18,6,0,-12________________-12,0,6,18,30
One part of the math that I'm not able to wrap my head around is how the units relate to each other on the Y-axis. If the unit pointing dead straight is dipped down 6 degrees from the horizon, the neighbor units mounted to the same plate would rise higher than the horizon the farther they are swiveled to the side. In fact, if a side light was pointing perpendicular in relation to the forward light, it would be shining 6 degrees above the horizon.
If anyone knows the equation to calculate the Y axis angles I would appreciate it if you shared it with me.
It would be nice to incorporate high-beam capability...It would be possible to use wider angle units but incorporate a cutoff. In another thread I saw a guy fab a "hood" with a small lip hanging down in front of the light. I tested the idea with a dinner plate and a stock mag and it worked very nicely. My cars high-beams work by retracting a similar hood with a solenoid. Although it works, moving parts will eventually break...
An alternative to the solenoid and hood would be to place a switchable LCD (liquid crystal) plate where the cutoff should be. These things are sometimes called electrochromatic,electrochromic,SPD,smartfilm,smartglass,and thermoglass. Essentially it is frost white until current is applied, then it is clear. While it is translucent, light does in fact get through, but it would probably not produce much glare & look kinda neat. However, I have no idea if smartfilm wastes electricity and it is also very hard to find. There are youtube vids of license plate covers and window tint...all controlled by switches. A couple problems...Although the filter goes from frost to clear instantly, it takes a moment to go from clear to frost. Another problem is cold weather...I have no idea how all of this deals with freezing temps.
Has this been tried before? Any examples of 12 degree LED units?
Thanks for any input, Steve
 
Last edited:
I realize that its not legal (&reckless) to use DIY LEDS on a car. That being said, I am interested in exploring the design of an LED system for an automotive application that could theoretically meet DOT requirements for safety and efficacy. Kids, do not try this at home.
I measured the light pattern shining from my Infiniti G37 HID projectors last night. The lens is approximately 2 feet from the pavement. The light cast at any point in front of the car is cut off at about 2 feet from the ground, so if you are approaching a hitchhiking cheerleader, all that is really illuminated well is her legs. Anything above that line is kinda dark. The pavement that is in front of the car is illuminated from some distance far away up to 9.3 feet in front of the bumper. So, a light that projects no higher than itself (2 feet) and no lower than 9.3 feet ahead is about 12 degrees. Car lights also need to cast light to the sides of the road. So, if you didnt have access to the fancy optics that the car manufacturers are using, you could approximate the same beam pattern with multiple LED units. If we could find a combination of LED and lens that completely and evenly fill a 10-14 degree cone (without significant spill outside the cone) we would be set. It is important that the light does not exceed the spread limit because it will cause glare for other drivers. Each LED unit would need to be angled to the left and right to cover the field of view. 72 degrees of light seems to be what my car produces (well kinda...my lights swivel as I turn so the field is actually much wider, so side firing LEDs could be switched on to replicate this feature). Assuming only one unit is needed per section, a single bank of 6 units at 12 degrees each on a bicycle/motorcycle would approximate what my G37 headlights illuminate when pointing forward. Since automotive applications involves 2 banks of lights, additional emitter units would need to face inward to avoid a 6 foot wide dead zone directly in front of the vehicle. for 12 degree units, the math works nicely if each side has a unit with partially redundant coverage pointing dead ahead and has an additional unit inboard covering the middle. When looking at the front of the vehicle, the angles would be:
30,18,6,0,-12________________-12,0,6,18,30
One part of the math that I'm not able to wrap my head around is how the units relate to each other on the Y-axis. If the unit pointing dead straight is dipped down 6 degrees from the horizon, the neighbor units mounted to the same plate would rise higher than the horizon the farther they are swiveled to the side. In fact, if a side light was pointing perpendicular in relation to the forward light, it would be shining 6 degrees above the horizon.
If anyone knows the equation to calculate the Y axis angles I would appreciate it if you shared it with me.
It would be nice to incorporate high-beam capability...It would be possible to use wider angle units but incorporate a cutoff. In another thread I saw a guy fab a "hood" with a small lip hanging down in front of the light. I tested the idea with a dinner plate and a stock mag and it worked very nicely. My cars high-beams work by retracting a similar hood with a solenoid. Although it works, moving parts will eventually break...
An alternative to the solenoid and hood would be to place a switchable LCD (liquid crystal) plate where the cutoff should be. These things are sometimes called electrochromatic,electrochromic,SPD,smartfilm,smartglass,and thermoglass. Essentially it is frost white until current is applied, then it is clear. While it is translucent, light does in fact get through, but it would probably not produce much glare & look kinda neat. However, I have no idea if smartfilm wastes electricity and it is also very hard to find. There are youtube vids of license plate covers and window tint...all controlled by switches. A couple problems...Although the filter goes from frost to clear instantly, it takes a moment to go from clear to frost. Another problem is cold weather...I have no idea how all of this deals with freezing temps.
Has this been tried before? Any examples of 12 degree LED units?
Thanks for any input, Steve

I just realized something...
The equation for the Y-axis is only necessary if the emitters are mounted on a single flat surface. If individual heat sinks were used for each emitter, you could cut the front of the heatsink to the correct X,Y angle by using the same compound miter chart you use to cut crown molding. The individual units could then be installed in a line, circle, or whatever looks nice or fits in your housing (Infiniti Q45-style). The orientation of each to its neighbor would'nt matter at all. As long as the heatsinks are right-side-up & mounted to something that is level and square, the emitter will be pointing in the correct direction.
 
Just a point of reference, you DO NOT want an even light distribution along those 12 degrees. There should be significantly more light towards the top of the cutoff, since that light gets more spread out on the road. The idea is to have a gradient from bright to dark, which would give a uniform lighting.

This may help (picture from JVX on HIDPlanet, hosted by me)
DSC_3950h.jpg


Notice the center hotspot, extended to the sides, and the DOT step. Notice how it gets dimmer the lower you go. The lower parts of the beam hit the road closer to the car, so there should be less light there, as it will cover a smaller area (basic trigonometry)

Also, as another point of reference, I do believe that most OEM LED headlights use half of a parabolic reflector to create a "half moon" shape output, then use a lens to magnify it, creating a sharp cutoff. Off-the-shelf LED optics are usually designed for a spot or elliptical beam. Headlights are supposed to make something of an elliptical beam with a cutoff, which could be fabricated with another lens and aperture. In addition, as you do need a focused hotspot, a collimator or reflector may assist in the design as well.
 
Last edited:
1. Solenoids are extremely reliable, and my guess is a well designed system will outlast the car many times over.
2. LCDs, et al, don't go completely dark, there will be leakage.
3. LCDs, et al, don't go clear, there will be lots of loss.
4. LCDs, et al, don't like that much heat, UV, etc, that close up. It won't be long lived AT ALL!

My cars high-beams work by retracting a similar hood with a solenoid. Although it works, moving parts will eventually break...
An alternative to the solenoid and hood would be to place a switchable LCD (liquid crystal) plate where the cutoff should be. These things are sometimes called electrochromatic,electrochromic,SPD,smartfilm,smartglass,and thermoglass. Essentially it is frost white until current is applied, then it is clear. While it is translucent, light does in fact get through, but it would probably not produce much glare & look kinda neat. However, I have no idea if smartfilm wastes electricity and it is also very hard to find. There are youtube vids of license plate covers and window tint...all controlled by switches. A couple problems...Although the filter goes from frost to clear instantly, it takes a moment to go from clear to frost. Another problem is cold weather...I have no idea how all of this deals with freezing temps.
Has this been tried before? Any examples of 12 degree LED units?
Thanks for any input, Steve
 
Also, as another point of reference, I do believe that most OEM LED headlights use half of a parabolic reflector

Parabolic reflectors haven't been used in new headlamp designs for many years. The reflectors you are describing sometimes have a scoop shape, but they aren't parabolic or ellipsoidal; they're complex shapes, not surfaces of rotation.
 
Parabolic reflectors haven't been used in new headlamp designs for many years. The reflectors you are describing sometimes have a scoop shape, but they aren't parabolic or ellipsoidal; they're complex shapes, not surfaces of rotation.

I saw some cutaway pictures from a Lexus LS600hl, and they looked like parabolic reflectors. Guess they are something similar, but not quite. Definitely had the LEDs mounted facing up, with a concave mirror above it focusing the light forward, then a lens. Similar approach to a regular HID projector, except with the nifty trick of not bothering to light the bottom half of the projector (since a good portion of that light is blocked by the cutoff shield), taking advantage of the fact that LEDs are 120 degree output instead of 360 like a HID capsule.
 
Last edited:
Yep, they're convex, just not parabolic. And yeah, system efficiency went way up when we stopped having to occlude 45% of the light source (therefore leaving 45% of the reflector and lens unusable) to create a low beam cutoff.
 
Just came across this page.

http://www.mazda3forums.com/index.php?topic=169286.0

Not that I would do it on my car (he never was able to get as much output as HID, and a HID capsule is a helluva lot cheaper than two SST-90 LEDs), but definitely an interesting read.

I've often tossed around the idea of trying to build something similar, except using several smaller projectors with 2-4 SSC P7s per side, because each LED had diminishing marginal returns because they were not as close to the focal point as the first LED. 2-4 smaller projectors, one upward facing LED per projector, and it might give some decent results. However, I'm in no rush to improve from my excellent Honda S2000 HID projectors.
 
Top