Not to presume to speak for the OP, but I just reviewed post #1, and I believe the OP posted seeking help in selecting some flashlights for use by camping staff.
Yeah, I guess we are getting a smidge off topic.
Dang. I rhymed and punned in that last post.
So often when one watches a video presentation of a beam shot, it is obvious that the camera is auto adjusting its aperture thus giving a consistent appearance, and not truly depicting the difference.I'm a photographer, so this evening I grabbed four flashlights and set up a proper fixed exposure to show a decently realistic impression of comparative light outputs - see below.
The remedies to the risks we perceive must be tolerated well enough by the children so as not to cause them to run away on purpose. Enough said?I was wondering how do you search? As far as I can see, searchlights have basically a narrow beam to find something. A wide beam will illuminate some area ahead, but it will not penetrate into the darkest corners.
For example, I was taught to search with a lantern with a narrow beam - to break the perspective into squares and examine one by one square by square, without leaving the spot. Move to a new point - continue scanning from the beginning in the same way.
View attachment 41680
Also, looking at a wide area may be less effective than looking at many small areas, since the brain will instinctively be lazy to look at the entire surface and something may escape the eye. Although you can use a combined beam - first inspect everything sequentially with a narrow beam, then look with a wide beam, then check everything again with a narrow beam and again with a wide beam.
Did I understand correctly that the main goal is to find missing children?
Another live hack is to hang bells on each. On your feet or on your hands so that they ring when you move, then they will be very easy to find if they move
View attachment 41681
YEP it is doable, but you need old type 2D to use drop ins, new led models will not work, nor there are any extensions available for them, lumencraft sells 1 and 2 D extensions. C lights do not have extensions available afaik, C are half the capacity of D so runtime will be half using alkalines, aliso most drop ins are made for D, very few fit CSo this may be my least coherent question yet but I have to know. Could I take something that would be considered a 2 D or 2 C size flashlight, such as a Maglite with a drop in higher powered emitter, with adapters if necessary, install 2 lithium rechargeable cells; If you'd like to see a huge smile make them Lithium Iron Phosphate cells; and an appropriate LED emitter and get some of what I've been hoping to find in the performance department. Could I then, having gone through 2 sets of rechargeable batteries, remove the now spent rechargeables, screw on a 2 cell extension tube, Install 4 Alkileak cells and run that same emitter with the 4 alkaline cells for some length of time. Initially the extension tube would be the carrier for the second set of charged LiFePH4 batteries to run the light for a second period on rechargeables. [If the rechargeables were LiFePH4 they would be a lot lighter than carrying Alkileaks.] Are any of the drop in reflector emitter assemblies for Maglites meant to be flooders? The underlying question is does the availability of extension tubes for Maglites open up any opportunities for making up a combination light that would give some effective level of brightness which would not quickly dim, in the neighborhood of 500 lumens in a 2 C or D form factor that could run at or about the same level of output as a 4 cell primary as it did as a 2 cell secondary. So the only thing would be to hold the Lumens close to constant and just add primary cells to the assembly to keep it running somewhat longer after the 2 sets of secondaries are drained. Is their anything uniquely useful in that approach. It seemed like if someone who really knows the available batteries and emitters would take a look at what could be fit into an erstwhile Alkileaks flashlight that would give it the performance desired in brightness while still permitting it to be run on readily available primary cell batteries when the available rechargeable batteries are exhausted.
Clear as mud right? Let me lay it out in list form.
If I were as familiar as many of you are with the emitters available and the battery dimensions, voltages, and amperage rates available I would know if this is feasible. I am not so I have to ask those that are.
- Start with a 2 cell C or D size flashlight that will except a drop in emitter of suitable brightness and that will run on 1 or 2 lithium ion rechargeable cell/s at an acceptable constant brightness.
- In other words at a setting that will not quickly dim the light.
- add an extension tube to provide enough space for 3 to 5 Primary cells that could still power the emitter at some constant lumen level.
- Extension tube holds second set of rechargeables to run emitter at the selected constant output.
- If second set of rechargeables become exhausted remove adapter sleeves if used, add extension tube to light, load needed number of best available primaries, resume operations.
Tom Horne
No, absolutely not enough. I'm sorry, I don't understand what the danger you perceive means? Does this danger have a name or is it some personal feeling that cannot be expressed in words?The remedies to the risks we perceive must be tolerated well enough by the children so as not to cause them to run away on purpose. Enough said?
Tom Horne
Lake County Search and Rescue
October 21, 2021
At approximately 20.00 on October 18th LCSAR was called out for an overdue hiker on Mount Elbert. The reporting party reported the subject had started hiking Mount Elbert from the South Trailhead at 09.00 that morning, and had not returned by 20.00 that evening. Multiple attempts to contact the subject via their cell phone were unsuccessful. 5 LCSAR members deployed at 22.00 to search high probability areas on Mount Elbert, but did not locate the subject, and left the field at approximately 03.00 on the 19th. At approximately 07.00 on the 19th, a team of 3 LCSAR members began the search in a new area where hikers typically lose the trail. At approximately 09.30 the reporting party reported the subject had returned to their place of lodging. All personnel were out of the field by 10.00.
The subject stated they'd lost the trail around nightfall and spent the night searching for the trail, and once on the trail, bounced around onto different trails trying to locate the proper trailhead, finally reaching their car the next morning, approximately 24 hours after they'd started their hike. They had no idea that SAR was out looking for them.
One notable take-away is that the subject ignored repeated phone calls from us because they didn't recognize the number. If you're overdue according to your itinerary, and you start getting repeated calls from an unknown number, please answer the phone; it may be a SAR team trying to confirm you're safe! Finally, to Mount Elbert hikers, please remember that the trail is obscured by snow above treeline, and will be in that condition now through probably late June. Please don't count on following your ascent tracks to descend the mountain, as wind will often cover your tracks.
Feasible? YesSo this may be my least coherent question yet but I have to know. Could I take something that would be considered a 2 D or 2 C size flashlight, such as a Maglite with a drop in higher powered emitter, with adapters if necessary, install 2 lithium rechargeable cells; If you'd like to see a huge smile make them Lithium Iron Phosphate cells; and an appropriate LED emitter and get some of what I've been hoping to find in the performance department. Could I then, having gone through 2 sets of rechargeable batteries, remove the now spent rechargeables, screw on a 2 cell extension tube, Install 4 Alkileak cells and run that same emitter with the 4 alkaline cells for some length of time. Initially the extension tube would be the carrier for the second set of charged LiFePH4 batteries to run the light for a second period on rechargeables. [If the rechargeables were LiFePH4 they would be a lot lighter than carrying Alkileaks.] Are any of the drop in reflector emitter assemblies for Maglites meant to be flooders? The underlying question is does the availability of extension tubes for Maglites open up any opportunities for making up a combination light that would give some effective level of brightness which would not quickly dim, in the neighborhood of 500 lumens in a 2 C or D form factor that could run at or about the same level of output as a 4 cell primary as it did as a 2 cell secondary. So the only thing would be to hold the Lumens close to constant and just add primary cells to the assembly to keep it running somewhat longer after the 2 sets of secondaries are drained. Is their anything uniquely useful in that approach. It seemed like if someone who really knows the available batteries and emitters would take a look at what could be fit into an erstwhile Alkileaks flashlight that would give it the performance desired in brightness while still permitting it to be run on readily available primary cell batteries when the available rechargeable batteries are exhausted.
Clear as mud right? Let me lay it out in list form.
If I were as familiar as many of you are with the emitters available and the battery dimensions, voltages, and amperage rates available I would know if this is feasible. I am not so I have to ask those that are.
- Start with a 2 cell C or D size flashlight that will except a drop in emitter of suitable brightness and that will run on 1 or 2 lithium ion rechargeable cell/s at an acceptable constant brightness.
- In other words at a setting that will not quickly dim the light.
- add an extension tube to provide enough space for 3 to 5 Primary cells that could still power the emitter at some constant lumen level.
- Extension tube holds second set of rechargeables to run emitter at the selected constant output.
- If second set of rechargeables become exhausted remove adapter sleeves if used, add extension tube to light, load needed number of best available primaries, resume operations.
Tom Horne
Years ago there were many threads here discussing "Vampire lights" ie ones that would continue to run to very low levels and drain half used batteries.P.S. - Poppy had a comment about this light on a previous page that I missed. He astutely notes that the light's output WILL fall off during continuous use. The question for Mr. Horne isn't however does the light output decline, rather the question is does it decline too much to be useful to the search team. My personal experience with this light is that the falloff will not be damning, and that the ability to switch back and forth, from 1200 lumens to 200 lumens, as needed, will mitigate the inevitable decline in alkaline cell performance. Also, the inevitable decline in output will still produce illumination sufficient to clearly illuminate the scene out to 25 feet. To my knowledge, no hand-carried lights powered by alkaline cells will be able to sustain high output levels for hours at a time. The choice is how much decline is acceptable while still remaining useful for the intended purpose. 'Nuff said.
@TD-HorneFeasible? Yes
Practical? No
At this point there is no defined "kit" for such a thing.