<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> Halogen MUST have heat, LED its detrimental. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Spot on!
LEDs are more efficient when they are cold. Halogens are only seriously efficient when the filament is about to melt.
Because of this, halogen filament lamps show economies of scale: they get more efficient as they get bigger; as the filament gets thicker, you can operate it at higher temperature, and you have fewer parasitic heat losses.
LEDs on the other hand have an inverse economy of scale. The bigger that they get, the harder it gets to carry heat away, and the less efficient they get.
If you need just 15 lumen of light, you can do it with a single Luxeon emitter operated at about 1 watt (this is for white light). If you tried to do this with halogen, it would probably take about 1.5 watt of electricity.
In the above example, in your proposed experiment, the LED would put out more total photons _and_ run for more time.
If you need 900 lumen of light, then you could do it with 60 Luxeons, consuming 60 watt of electricity, and needing quite a large heat sink to carry the heat away and keep the Luxeons cool. You could also get this same total light with a single, small Decostar IRC lamp, consuming 35 watt of electricity.
At this illumination level, the halogen would produce more total photons in your experiment.
Finally, if you needed _colored_ light, then the LEDs will beat the halogen at all illumination levels, at least for red, yellow, and green.
Regards,
Jon