I think the copy said something like "20,000 sold just last month!" Come on. I'd hate them for get even a profit of $1 for selling trash.
Yeah, common marketing strategy that makes me immediately disregard the product.
It's like Win10, "millions switched, so you should to!" Really? How many switched back right away and how many still want to go back to Win7 but can't figure out how?
And Win10 is just like those sites... just trying to draw people in so they can get all their data. (Okay, Win10 isn't out to steal our money and such, but it is trying to eat up our internet data which costs money. It also takes Google's account tracking for focused marketing to the next level, by tracking everything instead of just what we search, what sites we visit and how long we visit them.)
My new Olight i3s-EOS Cu = brassy (AAA) light arrived today.
I research all flashlight purchases thoroughly, and never purchase impulsively.
So imagine my shock & disappointment when it arrived with no magnet.
I went back to two different websites and can no longer find the wording about the advertised tail magnet-- that was one key factor leading me to spend $24.95 for this light.
While this light is impressive and beautiful, I don't know whether to return it, or keep it, because of my fondness for AAA lights with magnets (d25aaa; lumintop tool, etc.)
What would you do if you purchased a light only to find one of its formerly described features missing from websites/dealers who were selling it?
Working at a reseller, I actually see this more than I would like. A new flashlight gets released and I look at the stats and order it in and put it up on our site. Then, a few weeks later I check the manufacturer's listing and they've updated the data from the estimated values to the actual (usually lower) values for output, run time, PBI and such.
Although, when it comes to magnets... we had the opposite happen to us. We got in the product and discovered the tail cap had a magnet but found no mention on the manufacturer's site until the model was upgraded again.
I mean... these are 'accidental' false claims but it is annoying trying to determine if a new release is worth it when I know the brand will release only estimates early on without saying they are estimates. Of course, now we are having situations where we are expected to order new models with next to no data provided.
Stolen images for marketing... I should consider that. Throw some images online with our branding embedded in them and tag them up so the bots come and scoop them up. See what they do then!
Side note: Norton blocked most of those links to the adverts - malicious software wanting my stuffs.