Re: Long term effects of de-doming SST (higher Vf?)
Tonight I used a hot soldering iron to soften and scrape away the glow power infused epoxy from the star of the de-domed emitter. (Did you know that glow powder lights up when a hot soldering iron hits it?) In the process, the metal dome base also popped off. After that, I was able to remove the star from the torch and clean it off. I didn't think to grab a good photo of the star while I had it out, because despite all this abuse, I was actually able to salvage the SST and performed a star swap between the 5A regulated torch it was in and a small direct drive torch that had an in-tact SST-50 in it.
Here's a close-up of the de-domed emitter installed in the smaller torch and a few observations.
Close-up of de-domed SST-50 and what appears to be cooked phosphor
Now that the metal dome base is removed, it can be installed and focused perfectly in an UltraFire C8-A1:
Here's two quick and dirty beamshots taken with an automatic digi-cam in an unfinished basement. The pics don't do the perfectly round hotspot justice.
Against cardboard:
Against black sealed cement:
Now here's an interesting observation - the de-domed emitter in the direct drive torch (1*IMR18650) draws significantly less current than the in-tact emitter did. On the same battery that the in-tact emitter would draw ~5A from when the tailswitch was bypassed to measure current, this damaged emitter only draws ~3A.
I assume the reduced current draw is because the damaged parts of the emitter surface effectively reduced its working size or surface area. In effect, this has become an SST-30.
I'd be curious to know if de-doming alone raises the Vf of the emitter. I'm inclined to think not. It's more likely that the Vf of my de-domed emitter is higher becuase less of mine is in operation due to the damaged areas.
I like the beam of it in this new host so much that I'm considering leaving it that way. (I had intended to drop a CREE XM-L in that one as soon as they come out.)