Manker Quinlan T01 (XP-L HI, 1xAA/14500) Review: BEAMSHOTS, RUNTIMES, and MORE!

selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
T01%20003.jpg

T01%20004.jpg


Manker is a relatively new manufacturer on the scene. Here I have the shipping version of their popular 1xAA light, the Quinlan T01. Using the latest Cree XP-L HI emitter (optimized for throw), the T01 has impressive specs on both standard AA and 14500. Let's see if it lives up to them. :wave:

Manufacturer Reported Specifications:
(note: as always, these are simply what the manufacturer provides – scroll down to see my actual testing results).

  • CREE XPL-HI LED.
  • Max Lumen Output: 500LM (drive byEneloop Pro NI-MH battery).
  • Max Lumen Output: 900LM (drive by Lithium Battery 14500).
  • Peak beam intensity: 10,000 cd (drive by Eneloop Pro NI-MH battery).
  • Peak beam intensity: 20,000 cd (drive by Lithium Battery 14500).
  • Beam distance: 925ft/ 282m.
  • 4 brightness levels plus 3 modes: Turbo - high - mid - low - strobe - SOS - Location Beacon
  • IPX-8 waterproof standard of up to 2 meters/6.6 feet. Protects the light from strong water drop and heavy rain
  • Impact resist up to 2 meters/6.6 feet.
  • Offers General and Pro two operating modes: Long press for 10s to change modes
  • Compatible with Ni-MH AA, Li-ion 14500 and LiFeCOPO4 batteries: Easy to find and replace with
  • Max 150 hours run time, suitable for outdoor and emergency use
  • HA-III military standard hard anodized, original color.
  • Tail stand
  • Titanium coated two-way clip
  • Machine from aerospace grade solid aluminum bar
  • Size:Length 84mm Head Diameter 29MM Tail Diameter 20mm
  • MSRP: ~$63
Although it is not specified above, there are actually three possible settings for each constant output mode – making a total of 12 possible output levels. I will explain the programming feature later in this review

T01%20001.jpg

T01%20002.jpg


My T01 review sample came in simple hard cardboard box with cut-out packing foam. Included with the light were a pocket clip and simple wrist lanyard (both attached) and manual.

T01%20027.jpg

T01%20020.jpg

T01%20013.jpg

From left to right: Panasonic Eneloop Pro AA NiMH; Manker Quinlan T01; Zebralight SC5; Nitecore EA11; Olight S15; Thrunite Archer 1A V2; Skillhunt DS10.

All dimensions are given with no batteries installed:

Manker Quinlan T01: Weight: 61.7g, Length 84.5mm, Width (bezel) 29.8mm

Fenix LD12: Weight: 52.3g, Length: 99.9mm, Width (bezel): 21.6mm
Nitecore MT1A: Weight: 54.6g, Length: 104.6mm, Width (bezel): 22.7mm
Olight S15: Weight: 46.4g, Length: 87.0mm, Width (bezel): 23.1mm
L3 Illumination L10: Weight: 20.7g, Length: 79.4mm, Width (bezel): 17.1mm
Lumintop ED15: Weight: 59.7g, Length: 100.2, Width (bezel): 21.9mm
Skilhunt DS15: Weight: 52.0g, Length: 92.1mm, Width (bezel): 24.0mm
Thrunite Archer 1A v2 CW: Weight: 66.9g, Length: 109.6mm, Width: 23.1mm
Thrunite Neutron 2A 2014 (1xAA form): Weight: 57.6g, Length: 95.6mm, Width (bezel): 25.6mm
Zebralight SC5: Weight 58.3g, Length 81.5mm, Width (bezel): 22.6mm, Width (max) 27.0mm
Zebralight SC52: Weight 39.5g, Length 79.0mm, Width (bezel): 22.6mm, Width (max) 25.4mm

T01%20005.jpg

T01%20006.jpg

T01%20008.jpg

T01%20009.jpg

T01%20011.jpg


The overall build of the T01 seems to be of above average quality. Machining looks good, although the knurling and ridge detail is very smooth. There was no damage or chips on the light gray "natural" finish on my sample.

Switch is an electronic switch mounted on the head, slightly recessed, with a relatively grippy textured button cover. Switch feel is fairly typical for an electronic switch, and is easy to find by touch alone.

Screw threads are square-cut and anodized for tailcap lock out. There is a dual-spring design in the tailcap. The lighter secondary spring is presumably to provide a lower resistance path, which will be helpful on the high-current draw modes on 14500.

Note that the body tube is also a little short, and won't easily take protected 14500 batteries without a lot of force when screwing down the tailcap (and even then, may not connect). I was not able to use anything other than my AW protected 750mAh 14500s. The light may be best suited to unprotected 14500 (e.g. IMR). Also, flat-top 14500 batteries will not work in the light, due to the raised metal ring around the contact disc in the head.

The light comes with a removable metal pocket clip, and a reasonable wrist strap (that can only attach to the clip, as there is no attachment point on the body). Clip fits the body fairly firmly.

T01%20007.jpg

T01%20016.jpg


The head is relatively large for a 1xAA light, with a deep and smooth reflector for maximum throw. There is a luminescent green o-ring in the head, between the glass lens and bezel. Centering of the emitter seems pretty good – scroll down for beamshots and direct measures.

User Interface

The T01 has two control interfaces – a General Mode and a Pro mode.

General Mode

General mode is fairly straightforward. Press and hold the electronic switch to activate the light in its last memorized level (press and hold again to turn Off).

Single click to advance modes when on, in the reoccurring sequence of Lo > Med > Hi > Turbo.

There is a shortcut to the Lo mode from Off: simply click the switch (press and hold to turn off).

Double-click the switch when On to enter into the blinking modes. When in the blinking mode set, single click to advance through the following modes, in a reoccurring loop: Strobe > SOS > Beacon. Double-click again to exit blinking modes and return to constant output modes. There is no mode memory for the blinking modes.

To switch between General and Pro mode, press and hold the switch (from Off) for 10 secs, until the light blinks rapidly and turns off.

Pro Mode[/u]

Pro Mode is superficially similar to the General mode, but all the programming features are now available under the blinking mode set.

See the General Mode instructions above for basic light operation. As before, double-click (when On) enters you into the blinking modes.

Mode sequence in the blinking set is different now. You will now move through in reoccurring sequence (upon a single click) the following modes: Strobe > SOS > Beacon > Full Power (direct-drive) > Battery Readout > Lo Mode Setting > Med Mode Setting > Hi Mode Setting > Turbo Mode Setting.

The Mode Setting for sub-levels above are a little unusual. When you enter into the first one (Lo Mode setting), the light initially shows the lowest possible Lo mode sub-level (Lo 1, "2 lm"). After two seconds, it will advance to the second choice (Lo 2, "7 lm"). After another 2 seconds, it will advance to the third choice (Lo 3, "10 lm"). It then re-starts in 2 seconds, and runs through all these sub-level options again.

You select the sub-level you want by single clicking the switch when the light is displaying the mode you want. If you do nothing, the light will simply keep cycling between these 3 choices indefinitely.

Once you have made your Lo mode selection, the light advances to the Med mode, and runs through the 3 sub-levels there is exactly the same way. Click to make your choice.

This is then followed by the Hi mode, and then the Turbo mode. Upon your final selection, the light will return to Strobe mode, and will cycle through the blinking mode sequences again on successive single clicks.

To exit without reprogramming any level, press-and-hold to turn the light Off.

What this means in practice is that if you want enter the re-programing step for any level, you MUST re-program not only that level, but any lower level that comes before it. It runs through the programming level in sequence, requiring you to reset all the earlier levels. :shrug:

The memory settings for the sub-levels are retained, even with battery changes. Note that if you return the General mode, you will get only the original default sub-levels for each output mode. However, if you re-enter the Pro mode, you will find the light returns to your previously set sub-levels (i.e., the memory for the sub-levels is specific for the Pro mode only, and is not erased by switching between operational modes).

Here is a chart from the Manker website, shown in the manual, that explains the user interface in a flow-diagram fashion:

21083263054_e7fe0759c0_o.jpg


Default output levels

The manual indicates that by default, the General mode is set to L1 > M2 > H2 > T3 (i.e., the lowest low, and highest Turbo).

However, my T01 sample was inconsistent on the Hi level, and occasionally defaulted to H1 or H3 instead.

Video Overview:

For information on the light, including the build and user interface, please see my video overview:



Note that my video was taken early in testing, so I have a few more annotations than usual in the final video - I recommend you have annotations turned on with all my videos.

As an aside, if you want to get an instant notification for every new review that I post here on CPF, you can subscribe to my YouTube channel (the vids go public at the same time). Just mouse over my logo watermark on the top right-hand corner of the video for the subscribe feature to open up. You may need to tap or click, depending on the platform you are using to watch. :wave:

PWM/Strobe

The Manker T01 shows no signs of pulse width modulation (PWM) on any level. The light appears to be fully current controlled. See example M2 mode trace below, as an example.

T01-CC.gif


Strobe:
T01-Strobe.gif


The strobe mode is a disorienting 15.3 Hz tactical strobe.

SOS:
T01-SOS.gif


A fairly rapid SOS mode.

Beacon:
T01-Beacon.gif


Beacon is a full power flash, once every ~1.1 seconds (~0.9 Hz)

Standby Drain

A standby current drain is inevitable on the T01, due to the electronic switch in the head. There is no difference between the General and Pro modes. Here is what I found on my sample:

5.5 uA on Eneloop Pro NiMH
18.0 uA on 14500 3.7V

Assuming a Panasonic ~2500mAh Eneloop Pro NiMH, that current would translate into over 50 years before the battery would be drained – clearly not a concern.

On 14500, the higher drain and lower capacity (750mAh) means that a standard 14500 would be drained in about 4 years and 9 months – still not much of a concern.

You can fully break this current - and physically lock-out the light - by twisting the tailcap a quarter turn.

Beamshots:

All lights are on Max output on Panasonic Eneloop Pro AA NiMH. Lights are about ~0.75 meter from a white wall (with the camera ~1.25 meters back from the wall). Automatic white balance on the camera, to minimize tint differences.

T01-AA-Beam%20001.jpg
SC5-Beam%20001.jpg

1A-CW-Beam%20001.jpg
S15-AA-Beam001.jpg


T01-AA-Beam%20002.jpg
SC5-Beam%20002.jpg

1A-CW-Beam%20002.jpg
S15-AA-Beam002.jpg


T01-AA-Beam%20003.jpg
SC5-Beam%20003.jpg

1A-CW-Beam%20003.jpg
S15-AA-Beam003.jpg


T01-AA-Beam%20004.jpg
SC5-Beam%20004.jpg

1A-CW-Beam%20004.jpg
S15-AA-Beam004.jpg


As you can see, that's an incredible amount of throw from a single 1xAA light running standard NiMH. The T01 is also very highly driven on standard AA, though not as much as the floodier Zebralight SC5.

1x14500 (AW Protected 14500) Li-ion Comparison:

T01-14500-Beam%20001.jpg
SC52-14500-Beam001.jpg

V11R-14500-Beam001.jpg


T01-14500-Beam%20002.jpg
SC52-14500-Beam002.jpg

V11R-14500-Beam002.jpg


T01-14500-Beam%20003.jpg
SC52-14500-Beam003.jpg

V11R-14500-Beam003.jpg


T01-14500-Beam%20004.jpg
SC52-14500-Beam004.jpg

V11R-14500-Beam004.jpg


Scroll down for actual beam intensity measures.

Testing Method:

All my output numbers are relative for my home-made light box setup, as described on my flashlightreviews.ca website. You can directly compare all my relative output values from different reviews - i.e. an output value of "10" in one graph is the same as "10" in another. All runtimes are done under a cooling fan, except for any extended run Lo/Min modes (i.e. >12 hours) which are done without cooling.

I have devised a method for converting my lightbox relative output values (ROV) to estimated Lumens. See my How to convert Selfbuilt's Lightbox values to Lumens thread for more info.

Throw/Output Summary Chart:

My summary tables are reported in a manner consistent with the ANSI FL-1 standard for flashlight testing. Please see http://www.flashlightreviews.ca/FL1.htm for a discussion, and a description of all the terms used in these tables. Effective July 2012, I have updated all my Peak Intensity/Beam Distance measures with a NIST-certified Extech EA31 lightmeter (orange highlights).

Let's start with an overall comparison, including throw:

T01-FL1-Summary-1.gif


T01-FL1-Summary-2.gif


As you can see, that is a lot of throw from a single 1xAA light. :eek:oo: Clearly, the combination of a heavily-driven circuit, XP-L HI emitter, and relatively deep and smooth reflector has paid off.

But to understand the 14500 results, keep in mind that I am using older AW protected 750mAh ICR cells.

Let's look at the relative output levels, for each sub-mode and battery type:

T01-Lumens.gif


Manker's specs for standard NiMH AA match my estimated ANSI FL-1 output measures correlate remarkable well, across the board :eek:oo: It is just the lowest L1 level that seems more "moonlight" like on my sample.

Again, 1x14500 specs seem fairly accurate for the Lo, Med and Hi sub-levels (although L2 and L3 are exactly the same). However, the specs for the Turbo sub-levels seem to over-estimate output relative to my testing.

One possibility is that the standard AW protected 750mAh ICR 14500 batteries used in my testing may not be able to provide the maximum possible output in the T01. They are also not new, and have received a fair amount of testing use already. However, I was not able to test any of my newer protected 14500 from other makers (e.g. Olight), as I was unable to screw the cap down tightly enough to make contact on the T01. :shrug:

If you are curious, initial max output on 14500 in my lightbox was ~750 estimated lumens (although it rapidly drops off the for the ANSI FL-1 measures at 30 secs shown above). But again, you might do a bit better with newer cells. And I expect unprotected IMR cells may indeed get you closer the rated T01 specs.

As an aside, I presume the low-voltage cut-off on standard cells suggests there is an equivalent one for Li-ions as well - but I can't confirm that until I get some unprotected 14500s on hand to test.

Output/Runtime Graphs:

Note that I currently use Eneloop Pro NiMH anyway (2550mAh typical capacity) in my testing now. And all my standard runtimes are done under a cooling fan, as always.

T01-HiEnePro_1.gif

T01-MedEnePro.gif


T01-HiAlka_1.gif

T01-MedAlka_1.gif


T01-HiL91_1.gif


The performance of the T01 is very impressive on standard AA batteries. It performs with very flat regulation and overall efficiency comparable to the best current-controlled competition (although the Zebralight SC5 does still have a slight edge). Note the timed step-down on Turbo.

Unlike the SC5, you don't get the defined step-downs as the batteries drain here. And there seems to be a slightly early termination on the T01 (some sort of circuit cut-off perhaps?). This means you won't over-drain your NiMH – but it also means you may find yourself without light when the batteries are nearly exhausted (on both AA and NiMH).

As an aside, these results further support the T01 being current-controlled.

T01-Hi14500_1.gif

T01-Med14500.gif


On 1x14500, you can see the T01 is struggling to maintain regulation (at least on my AW protected 750mAh ICR batteries). For the most-part, this regulation pattern is pretty close to direct-drive. That said, overall efficiency is still top-notch. But since max output is not that much higher (at least on my AW protected ICR batteries), you are really best sticking with NiMH AA for maximum runtime and flat regulation on the T01.

Again, unprotected IMR 14500 may get you a higher initial output, and improved regulation.

Potential Issues

Due to the very throwy nature of the light, you can expect some artifacts in the beam hotspot – although these are only really noticeable on smooth surfaces.

Given the heavily-driven nature on the highest levels, stick with good quality NiMH. Alkaline batteries will not perform well at all on these levels.

Body tube is a little short, and not all protected 14500 cells will fit and work in the light. Only my AW protected 750mAh cells would work (and even then, a fair amount of force was required).

The T01 output specs are remarkably accurate – except for the Turbo sub-levels on 1x14500. However, that may be due in part to the older AW 750mAh protected ICR cells that I am using in my testing. Newer cells – especially unprotected IMR – should be capable of somewhat higher sustained output.

The default sub-level settings of the T01 in General mode are good – although I found the Hi level would sometimes activate in Hi1 or Hi3 (and not consistently in Hi2, as expected).

The sub-level programming of the Pro Mode is a little unusual, and requires you to reset each output level in sequence (from the Lo to Turbo). While you will need the manual initially to program, it is straight-forward and easy to do on the fly, once you get used it.

Due to the electronic switch, there is a minimal stand-by current - but it is so low as to be completely negligible in practice. You can always lock out the light at the tailcap to prevent accidental activation.

Preliminary Observations

The T01 is very impressive offering from a new manufacturer. It has outstanding throw, output and runtime performance, and support for both standard AA and 14500 Li-ion. :eek:oo:

Manker has certainly spent some time getting a good circuit put together, as you can see by the lack of PWM, excellent efficiency, flat regulation (on standard AA), and good range of output levels. The AA specs are bang-on here, and there are no issues with the performance of the light. The programming interface may not be the most intuitive, but it works well once you get used to it (and is easy to use in both General Mode and Pro Mode).

Performance on 14500 is very good for this battery class, but there are some issues. Foremost is the difficulty in getting modern protected 14500 batteries to fit in the light – it takes a lot of force to screw down the tailcap, and I was unable to get some brands to work (due to length). Also, the light is largely direct-drive on 14500 (at least on the higher levels tested here). Turbo output was lower in my testing than the specs indicate, but that may have to do with the age of the cells I had on hand (i.e., none of my newer 14500s would fit).

I would expect unprotected IMR 14500 to have greater sustained output on Turbo. I plan to order some of these on my next battery batch purchase, but it will likely be a few months before I can update this review. In any case, 14500 has much lower work capacity than modern NiMH - and so would underperform in runtime at lower levels. Unless you really need the extra turbo output, I recommend you stick with quality NiMH AA.

Beam pattern is incredibly throwy for a light this size – this is a real pocket rocket. :eek:oo: There are some artifacts in the hotspot, but these are really only noticeable at close range on smooth surfaces.

If you want to impress people with how far a 1xAA can throw, this is the light for you. :rolleyes: I'm glad to see they haven't skimped on the circuit design or feature set, and performance is right up there with other top lights in this class. It is certainly a distinctive new offering!

P.S.: I will update this review once I get some IMR 14500 cells in to test. :wave:

----

T01 was supplied by Manker for review.
 
Last edited:
S

scs

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,803
Thanks for the review!
 
kreisl

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,204
Thanks selfbuilt for the excellent review!

I own this light too and it is my most impressive AA light. I shared some of my info on cut-off voltage and stand-by current drain in UPz's CPF review thread. I'll try to get my hands on another unit. It's also available with black anodization, refined machining, thicker pocket clip, silent updates and such down the line.
:thumbsup:

Here a list of some other reviews:
  1. 2015-09-15 Trevilux : MANKER MK-T01 XP-L Hi (AA/14500) (ForoL, Spanish)
  2. 2015-09-16 placebo : MANKER T01 - 800lm (1xAA/14500) (TLF, German)
  3. 2015-09-22 circumlucens : Kurzreview Manker Quinlan-T01 (TLF review, German)
  4. 2015-09-24 write2dgray : Manker Quinlan-T01 (BLF, English)
  5. 2015-09-24 livesmith : Manker Quinlan T-01 Review (BLF review, English)
  6. 2015-09-24 livesmith : Manker Quinlan T-01 Review (CPF repost, English)
  7. 2015-09-24 Johnny : Review: Manker T01 Prerelease Sample (BLF review, English)
  8. 2015-09-24 Johnny : [Review] Manker T01 EDC Prerelease Sample (CPF repost, English)
  9. 2015-09-30 amaretto : Manker Quinlan T01: Review / Test (TLF review, German)
  10. 2015-10-02 Trevilux : MANKER QUINLAN T01 (XP-L Hi, 1XAA/14500) Review (LuxL review, Spanish)
  11. 2015-10-04 Bluzie : Vorstellung: Manker Quinlan T01 (TLF review, German)
  12. 2015-10-09 amaretto : Passaround Manker Quinlan T01 (TLF passaround, German)
  13. 2015-10-11 brucejiang : Brief Review of MANKER T01---Compared with SUREFIRE mods (CPF review, English)
  14. 2015-10-15 Nexxos1412 : Manker Quinlan T01 - PA Reviews, Test- und Erfahrungsberichte (TLF passaround reviews, German)
  15. 2015-10-20 candle lamp : Manker QuinLan T01 - Pre-production (XP-L HI, 1xAA or 1x14500) Review (CPF review, English)
  16. 2015-10-20 candle lamp : Manker QuinLan T01 - Pre-production (XP-L HI, 1xAA or 1x14500) Review (fonarevka repost, English)
  17. 2015-10-21 candle lamp : Manker QuinLan T01 - Pre-production (XP-L HI, 1xAA or 1x14500) Review (OHLED repost, Korean)
  18. 2015-10-31 turboBB : In-depth vid review: Manker Quinlan T01 Compact Thrower (XP-L HI | 1 x AA / 14500) (BLF video review, English)
  19. 2015-10-31 turboBB : In-depth vid review: Manker Quinlan T01 Compact Thrower (XP-L HI | 1 x AA / 14500) (CPF repost, English)
  20. 2015-11-01 UPz : MANKER T01 (RdL review, Spanish)
  21. 2015-11-01 UPz : MANKER T01 (XP-L HI V3, 1x AA/14500) (ForoL repost, Spanish)
  22. 2015-11-03 UPz : [Review] Manker T01 (XP-L HI V3, 1x AA / 14500) (CPF review, English)
  23. 2015-11-03 UPz : [Review] Manker T01 (XP-L HI V3, 1x AA / 14500) (BLF repost, English)
  24. 2015-11-03 UPz : [Review] Manker T01 (XP-L HI V3, 1x AA / 14500) (fonarevka repost, English)
  25. 2015-11-08 msitc : Review: Manker Quinlan T-01 XP-L HI 1 x AA 900 Lumen max. pre-production sample (HT, German)
  26. 2016-01-15 selfbuilt : Manker Quinlan T01 (XP-L HI, 1xAA/14500) Review: BEAMSHOTS, RUNTIMES, and MORE! (CPF, English)
  27. 2016-05-07 Budda : Review of Manker Quinlan T01: pics, test and beamshots. (CPF review, English)
  28. 2016-05-08 Budda : Review and modding of Manker Quinlan T01 (BLF repost, English)
  29. 2016-07-03 Budda : Manker T01 - Unboxing, Review, Runtime and Beamshot (youtube, English)
  30. 2016-07-14 WalkIntoTheLight : Review: Manker T01 (1xAA / 14500) (BLF review, English)

NOTE: TLF pictures/photos don't display until you're registered and logged in to TLF.
( last really researched 2015-11-03 )
 
Last edited:
S

scs

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,803
Hey, beat Ryp for once. :)
 
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Hey, beat Ryp for once. :)
I haven't been posting as frequently lately, so I suppose it's harder to prepared when I put one up! :laughing:
 
Last edited:
S

scs

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,803
Excited to see an alternative to Zebralights' top of the class regulation. Would be even better if NW were available.
Glad to see that a new contender has spent the resources to produce their own boost circuit that can match ZLs. Eagerly awaiting an 18650 version buck+boost that can do the same.

With regards to the light's appearance, I can do without some of those edges. It would make pocket carry easier and machining would be cheaper too for Manker right?
 
Last edited:
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
I shared some of my info on cut-off voltage and stand-by current drain in UPz's CPF review thread.
Thanks for the link. I see you found similar standby currents. And good to know what the voltage cut-off is for 14500, since I don't have any unprotected cells on hand to test it.
 
MAD777

MAD777

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
4,445
Location
White Mountains, NH, USA
Quite a well performing little light. I've been looking at a couple of their offerings. This bodes well for the brand. Thanks for another thorough review, selfbuilt!
 
kreisl

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,204
In the brightness graphs, the Thrunite Neutron 2A 2014 (1xAA) would fit well in imho. Seems to have similar efficiency to the Manker T01. Almost the same. In many ways the Neutron (not the Archer 1A!) is the direct competitor against the Manker, next to the SC5. On the other hand, the point has already been proven thru the review that the T01 is reallly efficient and well-regulated on Eneloop. Just an opinion, it'd be appropriate to see both T01 and Neutron 2A in the same graphs, instead of the Archer 1A.

I use unprotected Sanyo 14500 batteries plus a mini neodymium, otherwise the plus pole wouldn't make contact with the driver disc. Not the best idea since the magnet could short-circuit the 14500 battery if it got in accidental contact with the reverse polarity protection spacer ring.

Looking forward to your the output with your new 14500 batteries! And yes, many protected 14500 batteries either do not make contact with the driver disc (flat top battery) or they are too long.

Unprotected 14500's with a nub would be the optimal choice of 14500 for this flashlight.
 
selfbuilt

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
In the brightness graphs, the Thrunite Neutron 2A 2014 (1xAA) would fit well in imho. ... Just an opinion, it'd be appropriate to see both T01 and Neutron 2A in the same graphs, instead of the Archer 1A.
That's a good point, the Neutron 2A is a better comparator. I have just updated all the Hi-mode graphs, and some of the Med graphs where I have data, to replace the Archer with the Neutron.

I use unprotected Sanyo 14500 batteries plus a mini neodymium, otherwise the plus pole wouldn't make contact with the driver disc. Not the best idea since the magnet could short-circuit the 14500 battery if it got in accidental contact with the reverse polarity protection spacer ring. ... And yes, many protected 14500 batteries either do not make contact with the driver disc (flat top battery) or they are too long. ... Unprotected 14500's with a nub would be the optimal choice of 14500 for this flashlight.
Yeah, it's a little surprising for a light that emphasizes its ability to run 14500 that it is so restricted in what it can handle (i.e., only unprotected 14500 with a positive nub are sure to fit and work in the light). I presume this is because they would prefer you to use unprotected higher-drain-rated cells - given the circuitry's built-in protections, and high drive levels on Turbo.

In any case, I also do not recommend the use of mini neodymium magnets. Frankly, I think it would have been better if they had just skipped the physical reverse polarity feature on this model, and allowed flat-top cells to be used. :shrug:
 
kreisl

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,204
Hello selfbuilt, thanks for having included (or substituted) the brightness graphs of Neutron 2A. Seems that the top brightness of Neutron 2A is higher than the T01 but the area under the curves is about the same. T01 doesn't perform well on Energizer Lithium, i see.
P.S.: I will update this review once I get some IMR 14500 cells in to test.
Do you mean these very ones?
aw-14500-15cy1syb.jpg


7.5€ apiece ouch.
Hopefully its nub is protruding enough to make contact with the driver disc!
 
Last edited:
S

Swedpat

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
3,448
Location
Boden, Sweden
Thanks Selfbuilt for the review of this little cool light! Maybe I include one next time I place an order from Banggood.
 
G

Gordo

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
112
Does anyone else hope that Zebralight takes the hint and makes a Turbohead SC5 and SC600?
 
D

DPRoberts

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
30
Several people in this thread have recommended the Thrunite Neutron 2A as a competitor to the Manker Quinlan T01. Is the Neutron 2A still in production? I don't see it listed on Thrunite's website, and I can't find it on Amazon (their official store) or any other site.
 
kreisl

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,204
i've seen neutron on amazon, you can google the term < neutron amazon thrunite >
 
P

Phlogiston

Enlightened
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Messages
602
Location
Scotland
If you're considering a Thrunite Neutron 2A, you might want to search CPF for members' experiences first. A number of quality control problems have been reported.
 
kreisl

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,204
I have placed an order for Unprotected white Tangsfire 14500 "1200mAh" nominal, i've spotted them on GB and DX. The DX site quotes 850mAh real capacity. I just don't want to use unprotected flat-top batteries with neodymium magnet anymore and my old protected Trustfire flames 14500 were an okay fit. Most protected 14500's don't fit in the T01 (too long!) and or don't make connection with the driver disc (too flat-top), i'd say, so unprotected 14500's with a button top are the only assured way to go.

Less than 2.5$ shipped including tracking number, cheaper can't go :D

1371689818847-p-88395ifuct.jpg


I'll report and share photos!
 
Last edited:
Tachead

Tachead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
3,872
Location
Northwestern Ontario, Canada
These Quinlan series lights look nice. I have to say though, they sure look a lot like the Nitecore MH20. They could have been a little more original with their design.
 
Tachead

Tachead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
3,872
Location
Northwestern Ontario, Canada
Any chance you are going to review the U11 as well Selfbuilt? Thanks for this review, its great as usual:thumbsup:
 
Top