Manker Quinlan T01 (XP-L HI, 1xAA/14500) Review: BEAMSHOTS, RUNTIMES, and MORE!

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,999
Location
Canada
I have placed an order for Unprotected white Tangsfire 14500 "1200mAh" nominal, i've spotted them on GB and DX. I'll report and share photos!
Let us know if they work. For me personally, I'll stick with eneloops - it's still crazy bright and throwy, and there's something to be said to telling people who ask: that is on a standard AA battery. :)

Any chance you are going to review the U11 as well Selfbuilt? Thanks for this review, its great as usual:thumbsup:
No immediate plans, and my docket is pretty full at the moment - quite a backlog of other lights I have to go through.
 

Tachead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
3,872
Location
Northwestern Ontario, Canada
Let us know if they work. For me personally, I'll stick with eneloops - it's still crazy bright and throwy, and there's something to be said to telling people who ask: that is on a standard AA battery. :)


No immediate plans, and my docket is pretty full at the moment - quite a backlog of other lights I have to go through.

Thank you for the reply sir:thumbsup:
 

recDNA

Flashaholic
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
8,761
I was all set to purchase until I saw the ui and finicky battery tube. I always though ZL should use xp-l hi instead of xhp 35. I like the extra throw. This ui just doesn't compare to ZL imo. I like to be able to start in any mode I want... Like long press for turbo and double click for hi short click for low etc. I hate memory cuz mine isn't good enough to remember what mode it was in last.
 

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,241
Time to share, sharing is fun!

My geman dealer has the revised version in stock, it's in black ano, and early owners of the black version can check if their unit coincides with my new unit. Mine came with the Manker lanyard but i prefer a low profile generic wrist strap:
24843825202_c7bb97e05a_o.jpg

The black finish is as matt as the natural anodization of selfbuilt's unit and similarly matt as the original SC52 silver-grey finish before the Zebralight ano got glossier.

I like the black pseudo-matt finish bely much:
24666291920_a5a04e15cc_o.jpg

Can you tell that the bezel is in a glossier finish? Production batches from different days eventually result in such minimal differences between flashlight parts, oh well no big deal.

It's actually quite hard to capture the nature of the finish on photo. Very noticeable in RL but not so visible in my photos. How about a direct comparison to Eagtac anodization? All black Eagtac anos are super shiny, super glossy, yeah one can tell on the following pic:
24331184654_64619c8deb_o.jpg

Check out my old TX25C2 review for more Eagtac photos. Even though i never use the TX25C2, it doesn't feel very robust tbh, it's a keeper in my modest collection of flashlights.

I would say that Fenix ano isn't as glossy as Eagtac. And Manker ano isn't as matt as Armytac. Btw i am no fan of Eagtac or Fenix glossy finishes, they look/feel cheap imho. Hence we have the relation,
Armytek(=matt) < Manker (=matt/glossy) < Fenix (=glossy) < Eagtac (=super glossy),
check the reflection of the shininess on the four surfaces to verify the relation:
24935488166_a15798f75c_o.jpg


So what's new with this version? The UI, short click from OFF to Low (L1/L2/L3) was already mentioned in other recent reviews; disadvantage, possible accidental activation in the pocket. Wouldn't be too bad, it's the Low mode only. Or do a tailcap lockout.

The clip is new. Its ring is now seated 100% flush in the ring groove. The face side of the clip has now 2 cute holes at which i attach my wrist strap in a symmetrical way. The flashlight body has 3 longitudinal grooves, their width matches the width of the clip:
24868464271_161debaa71_o.jpg


I positioned the clip 180° opposite to the switch so that the clip rides in the longitudinal groove. In the following pic, part of the clip profile can't be seen because it is covered by the depth of the very groove. Also note that the tip of the clip does not touch the flashlight head or else. Hehe i actually had to bend the tip with my Vinox Spirit X a little, otherwise the tip would have touched the anodization. The clip is a deep-carry clip. In practice however the deep-clipping opening is too narrow to accept the brim of a jeans pocket, especially with the wrist strap attachment in da way, and with the bulky T01 head shape it'd be plain awkward to use the clip for actual clipping purposes anyway imo:
24331181234_fc187e5161_o.jpg


The most important change about the new clip is its thickness. All early clips were 0.80mm thick and felt too flexible because of the long clip length: the longer a clip is, the more flexible it is. This new clip is extremely strong with its 1.00mm thickness, as thick and sturdy as Armytac Tiara stainless steel pocket clips. Even if nobody uses T01 clips for actual clipping purposes (because of the T01 head shape), now nobody can criticize anymore that the clip feels flimsy or too flexible:
24666286530_65cbd9994b_o.jpg

On the above pics, why were there arrows pointing to the cooling fins? It's new on this version! Here i am detailing, the edges are chamfered/bevelled, not sharp anymore hooray:
24868460441_bc8ab31eea_o.jpg


The bevelling is on both edges of 1 cooling fin, of course:
24594160989_e230651374_o.jpg


What's also new, the reflector room is free from dust, particles, or whatsoever. Dusty reflectors were the standard in early production units. The maker did some cleaning since:
24843815872_8bd5cefe04_o.jpg


In all fairness one can still see something itsy-bitsy on the following pic. Well, that's dust on the glass lens (not the reflector!). I don't live very clean lol:
24666283250_6544914ff6_o.jpg


The battery compartment hasn't changed much. The inner diameter of the reverse polarity protection (RPP) ring is wider, okay. But the rest is the same. By measuring different depths of the T01 body, the distance to the disc center, the distance to the RPP ring, i found out that the battery (+)nub needs to be longer than 1.00mm. No problem with AAA w/ AA adapter, Sanyo Eneloop, or Ni-Zn battery, from left to right:
24594158769_d3e18a6285_o.jpg

The button top of my 5pcs protected TF flames 14500 has horrible tolerances but their average nub length is 1.1mm. All 5 samples are ≤51.00mm long and make contact with the driver disc; the distance to the center of the driver disc is 52.5mm, which means that the longest supported battery (without copper washer as spacer in the tailcap) is 52.5mm, as long as that battery does have a nub longer than 1.00mm. From left to right: unprotected Sanyo UR14500P (no connection!), unprotected Sanyo UR14500P w/ neodymium, protected Trustfire flames 14500:
24594155059_b479f44e35_o.jpg

To reiterate the conditions of 14500 fitment:
The battery must have a protruding nipple longer than 1.00mm AND the total length of the battery must be below 52.5mm. Since there needs to be some clearance for the thickness of the double spring, probably the max acceptable total battery length is somewhere between 51.0…51.5mm. Clearly, if your battery (with a 1.1mm nub) has a total length of exactly 52.5mm, then it won't run in the T01 because of the missing clearance for the compressed tailcap spring!

The tailcap has a double spring for low resistance. When i measure tailcap current draw with UT61E, then the total resistance of my measurement system (probes, probe cables, shunt) will be higher than the original double spring resistance. Hence the following UT61E measurements are lower than the actual current (with no DMM in series):
new Sanyo UR14500P cell#1: 1.65A @4.2V t=1sec
new Sanyo UR14500P cell#2: 1.63A @4.2V t=1sec
old Trustfire flames 14500 cell#1: 1.40A @4.2V t=1sec
old Trustfire flames 14500 cell#2: 1.33A @4.2V t=1sec
old Trustfire flames 14500 cell#3: 1.36A @4.2V t=1sec
old Trustfire flames 14500 cell#4: 0.99A @4.2V t=1sec
old Trustfire flames 14500 cell#5: 1.34A @4.2V t=1sec

Some other measurements:
flashlight total length: 84.15mm
bezel diameter: 28.95mm

24961766585_37784e1234_o.jpg

no comment ;)

SC52 can clip stand, T01 cannot clip stand. At least not if a lanyard is attached to the front holes of the clip. I have arranged the clip position to match my SC52 flashlight. Look how perfect the strap attaches to clip and the hand automatically has something to hold on to:
24961765825_9b418386fb_o.gif


Last but not least, what's up with that button cartoon? Looks like a troll if you ask me:
24868446371_3ccd998c4e_o.jpg


Since the light is so throwy, i wouldn't mind a Fenix-style diffuser lens. Or a diffuser cap/cone. Anything. Needs to fit 29.0mm diameter. Olight, Fenix, Tank007 are known to make a wide range of diffusers but afaik none of them fit 29.0mm. Did anyone find a 29.0mm diffuser?
 
Last edited:

scs

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,803
Thanks for the pics and impressions, kreisl!

It's a good looking light. How's the ergo? Any discomfort after prolong use caused by the difference in head and body diameters?
 

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,241
ergo .. it's lies very comfortably in the hand, that's why i had to create'n share the animated GIF as proof haha. the light is a bit short but that fact is balanced by the side switch operation. imagine a short torch with a rear switch, not good as edc. i mean, it has ergos similar to SC52 tbh. T01 feels like a little tank, does look good, and is, in its revised version, totally likable. rounded fins, short-cut to Low from OFF, tough clip, clean reflector/lens, and beautiful uniform CW tint (no corona tint shift). things which should be better in future makes (Mk II): thicker tailcap threads. i'd also like to try a chamfered/rounded stainless steel bezel, flat with no scalloping. almost all sunbayman flashlights have SS bezels. i am not saying that a SS bezel would look better on the T01 but it's worth a try imho.
 

KeepingItLight

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 25, 2015
Messages
1,823
Location
California
Thanks, kreisl, for your detailed review of the updated Manker Godmes T01. The single-click that turns it on (instead of a press-and-hold) is big change.

BTW, I recall reading that the image on the button is of the Godmes character. I believe Godmes is a popular cartoon or TV superhero in China. I do not know the details.
 

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,241
The single-click that turns it on (instead of a press-and-hold) is big change.
From OFF: short click => turns ON in Low mode (any of L1, L2, or L3)
From OFF: long press => turns ON in the last memorized mode (e.g. H3)
From OFF: "normal" double click => turns ON in strobe mode
("normal" double click means "not tooo fast" double click ;) )

Zebralight UI distinguishes between short click (from OFF) and long press (from OFF) too :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:

Swedpat

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
3,448
Location
Boden, Sweden
I agree that it should be available in neutral tint as well. But it's still attractive: good performance even with alkalines except from the higher modes.
 

saypat

Enlightened
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
424
There are at least 2 UIs. Mine does not have the 1 click access to the low mode, on your video yours did. Here is the weird thing. I get into the programming mode, and set all the levels. Now, if I go to the flashy modes I get strobe, SOS, beacon....... then turbo, battery, etc. (I am still in programming mode!). I have to actually hold the button down from off for 10 seconds to EXIT the programming mode!
 

RBWNY

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
374
I just got the light...in silver (probably the previous version from what is decsribed above by kreisl). Anyway, like you said, Olight 14500's don't fit. But Efest IMR's do! And like you said...I'm pretty convinced that with the Efest, it's much closer to the stated output. I took a couple of outdoor shots on turbo using an Eneloop Pro and the Efest. There's definitely a difference the eye can see! They're not on the computer yet, but when they are I'll post `em here.
 

mrheosuper

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
55
I am considering this light with nitecore ec11
ec11 has a better dual button interface, has a red led( i don't what will i do with this led, but it's better, more is better)
Manker t01 has more throw(i guess), newer xpl-hl, can use the both ni-mh and li-ion
I want a pocket thrower, so, what should i choose
Btw: is it true that the manker can push to 500 lumen with single nimh battter?
 
Last edited:

Octavian

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
159
Location
Romania
Great review as always !

I receive the T01 II.
What a flashlight…I love it !

Incredible power light on AA NiMh battery, I find it more useful on AA NiMh configuration than 14500 because is real bright and have better runtime.
Button top battery (NiMh or 14500 ) is a tight fit ! sometimes don’t work. With flat battery is ok.
I used an unusual method to fit the button top NiMh, I smash the button with a hammer (but with max precaution ) and now is real ok, works great.
Don’t do that with LiIon battery !!!
lol.png

If would have also a mini usb charger on board was great, but anyway I’m impressed, nice little light ! My sample have a neutral light which I like.
No other comments for the moment, good built quality, nice finishing, nice throw, even nice form factor with the big head comparing with the body
smile.png
 

Umbrosoccer

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
63
I recieved a black manker t01. There is a yellow Spot in the middle of the beam when getting to 4 + feet away. Also my LED is quite off center. Is this normal for this model?

16387212_10100218144873195_3950293423652261263_n.jpg
16406592_10100218144893155_5280869331470776143_n.jpg
16473352_10100218144883175_7142230352958292596_n.jpg
16427577_10100218144888165_4510599526626693760_n.jpg
 
Top