Maratac AAA Q5 (Part 2)

Candle Power Flashlight Forum

Help Support CPF:

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've always been a fan of the med, low, high "Fenix pattern" if I can call it that? Low, especially on the Maratac is too low except for very dark night or well adjusted eyes. Med seems almost perfect and very slightly conservative for most tasks. For most of my uses I'd be having to double twist. 🙂



Most followers of this thread know that the moderators had to step in a couple of times, one of those times because of persistent shipping cost complaints which took the thread off topic. I did want to mention a follow up to this since it was brought up again.

I've had two conversations now with Nick at County Comm and during the second conversation we did touch on the shipping cost which has raised so much discussion. For CC, the biggest bonus to using UPS was to have a tracking# and a $100 insurance with each shipment. He went on to say that they're having terrible problems with lost or delayed items that were shipped USPS, which I can relate to in my own experience. Having a tracking number allows both parties to follow the item which is especially helpful for this particular seller in resolving problems that might arise. Since there's no tracking with USPS, assumed lost package scenarios get placed into a holding pattern or a "wait and see" system. This recently happened to me while shipping something in my own state via PM. It eventually showed up but it was 10 days later. In the meantime, I didn't know what to due or if I should file a claim or what. I've had 4 bad experiences with USPS in about 12 months with two items disappearing permanently.

I'm sure that we all have our own horror stories with different carriers but at some point CC chose to use UPS because it works best for them. They've been in the buisiness of shipping product for a long time now know the "ins and outs" after having weighed the pro's and con's of each delivery service.

P.S. Nick is reading this thread btw.


On a product note, I wanted to mention that my 2nd light has a much more centered emitter an that the beam color is very slightly warmer which is most noticeable on the low setting. Neither lights have a hint of blue which I really appreciate. Perhaps this is due to XP-E consistency? I'm not sure though.
 
Last edited:
Fooling around with the camera and my NA HA Maratac tonight:


Those are pretty cool Wade. Do you have the original non-color adjusted, first picture and if so, would you mind if I added it to post 1?

Thanks.
 
I've always been a fan of the med, low, high "Fenix pattern" if I can call it that? Low, especially on the Maratac is too low except for very dark night or well adjusted eyes. Med seems almost perfect and very slightly conservative for most tasks. Most most of my uses I'd be having to double twist. 🙂

Most of my uses I am double twisting as all I ever need is low. Sucks to have to waste battery life even for a split second every time you need to use the light.
 
Most of my uses I am double twisting as all I ever need is low. Sucks to have to waste battery life even for a split second every time you need to use the light.


Since you so often use the light on low which hardly requires any energy, maybe you could just switch over to a Photon or fauxton type light. I need the extra size because I'm using a lot more power than you are with my medium and high running. For walking around the house at night or finding my keys I use an Arc, E01 or fauxton myself. Admittedly, if I had to double twist a Fenix or Maratac for every occation that I needed just a few lumens, I might tire of that after a while.
 
Most of my uses I am double twisting as all I ever need is low. Sucks to have to waste battery life even for a split second every time you need to use the light.

Same feeling here. Low is all I need at night in a dark room. Also in public places like movie theaters I would definitely want to start on low and goes from there if needed. That's better than having too much light at first and having to turn it down. m/l/h is dumb dumb dumb.
 
Re: Maratac AAA Q5

Ceiling bounce results (high)

Maratac AAA
Duracell Alkaline 12.6 lux
Energizer NiMH 13.1 lux
Energizer L91 16.9 lux
Ultrafire 10440 30.2 lux


Added:
LDO1 Q5 10440 29.2 lux
LOD Q4 10440 27.1 lux

Did you do any ceiling bounce tests on medium? I would be curious what the lux readings would be for the Ultrafire 10440 on medium compared to the L91 on High.
 
Re: Maratac AAA Q5

Did you do any ceiling bounce tests on medium? I would be curious what the lux readings would be for the Ultrafire 10440 on medium compared to the L91 on High.



I attempted to before but the output was too low for the integrating bathroom test...lol.

I just used my poopy light box and got the following results on medium. Remember not to compare these with the prior non-light box tests.


Maratac (high)

Alkaline 46.1
L92 57.0
NiMH 63.6
10440 161.8


Maratac (medium)

Alkaline 14.5
NiMH 15.8
L92 16.5
10440 39.2


Maratac (low)

Alkaline 1.4
NiMH 1.5
L92 1.7
10440 3.9





(10440 high)

159 peak
149 10 sec
137 20 sec
126 30 sec
120 40 sec
115 50 sec
111 60 sec
 
Last edited:
Re: Maratac AAA Q5

I attempted to before but the output was too low for the integrating bathroom test...lol.

I just used my poopy light box and got the following results on medium. Remember not to compare these with the prior non-light box tests.


Maratac (medium)

Alkaline 14.5
NiMH 15.8
L92 16.5
10440 39.2

Thanks, so what was the lightbox reading for them on high, or did you post this already? Basically I want to know if the 10440 on medium is comparable to a L92 on high.
 
Re: Maratac AAA Q5

Thanks, so what was the lightbox reading for them on high, or did you post this already? Basically I want to know if the 10440 on medium is comparable to a L92 on high.


check now, previous post updated...
 
Re: Maratac AAA Q5

Anyone want to guess the out the front lumens with the Maratac on a 10440? It seems to be beating out the LOD/LD10's in bounce tests, so it could be in the 200+ lumen out the front range. 🙂

I almost went for a Liteflux LF2XT, but the Maratac is doing the job for me. I love that I can clip it inside my left front pocket and it's so small it doesn't get in the way. I also keep my iPhone in there. So I wanted something small that wouldn't clunk into my phone, etc. I still holster carry my LF3XT on my belt as my main EDC.

This is just a great little light for clipping in a pants pocket, shirt pocket, etc. With a 10440 you have a nice low, a good medium, and a blazing high. I love the wide hot spot created by the small textured reflector in the Natural version. I hear the black version throws better, but for this type of light I'd rather have more flood for close range tasks.

I hope Maratac continues to offer these and hopefully upgrades them from time to time when better emitters become plentiful, and maybe a new circuit with better PWM. 🙂


Also shouldn't the first post in this topic link back to the original Maratac topic?
 
Last edited:
Wade, I added the "continued from" link. 🙂

It's really difficult to know about the output without Gman testing it. If I compare the output of lights that he has tested and ratio that against my readings for the same models I'd say just under 200 lumens but above 180. The problem is that it drops so quickly that it's hardly worth giving credit to.

(10440 high)

159 peak
149 10 sec
137 20 sec
126 30 sec
120 40 sec
115 50 sec
111 60 sec



Btw, you won't have to worry about updates since they've already got some interesting plans in the works. 🙂
 
Last edited:
The problem is that it drops so quickly that it's hardly worth giving credit to.

Mine drops quickly also. In my lightbox it drops about 50lm in 30sec. When I test the amperage, it stays pretty much the same for 30sec. I would say the XP-E can't take the heat of over 1A.
 
Stock clip does not grip well. Removed and replaced with my own clip. Grips much stronger now. Looks better too.
IMG_2953.jpg
 
Stock clip does not grip well. Removed and replaced with my own clip. Grips much stronger now. Looks better too.

"Grips much stronger", ok I might believe that; "Looks better too", :sick2: ok now you're dreaming. :laughing:
 
They need to make an AA version of this light. Make it even smaller than the EZ AA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top