McGizmo PR-917 w/ E2 Ongoing Review Draft

  • Thread starter Thread starter **DONOTDELETE**
  • Start date Start date
D

**DONOTDELETE**

Guest
FIRST IMPRESSIONS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
I will refer to this custom-built flashlight as the PR-917*E2.

Don "McGizmo" McLeish graciously offered to provide me this light in another post where we had disccused the merits of the Surefire L4 Lumamax. I was provided a L4 for eval by an underling. I tested it briefly but, because I had several other incandescent lights that I promised to give my attention, I deferred my review. However, I responded to the L4 thread prematurely by describing how it lacked throw.

I don't ordinarily comment on a flashlight's performance until I had opportunities to actually use it in conjunction with tasks related to tactical engagements. I opted to comment on the L4 because it is the first regularly mass-produced LED flashlight that even approaches a level of light output suitable for tasks where a firearm may be deployed.

My primary reservation with the Surefire L4 Lumamax is that its output is not adequately concentrated enough to provide a projected spot small enough to place it on the center mass (the torso of an average human) of the target at distances typically between 21 to 30 feet. This criteria immediately demarkates the usage of handguns with barrels of 2 to 5 inches. This barrel length range is that typical of handguns ordinarily carried on-body for defensive purposes through those provided as primary duty sidearms for those in uniform.

For this evaluation, I will be using my defacto standard ASP Taclite; a flashlight that I have been carrying and using for almost six continuous years. The Taclite replaced my previous standard; the old style Surefire 6P with the 65-lumen, P60 lamp assembly. I began using the 6P in 1989 because it had the best combination of high output AND small physical size.

I switched to the ASP Taclite in 1997 because it had the capability of adjustment to a very narrow spot. I prefer this output because of the criteria in the next paragraph. In 2001, I discovered the "tear-drop" shape of the next generation, externally-focused tactical lights called the Triad offered by the same maker. In the Triad, the new bulb is underwhelming. However, when placed in the internally-focusable Taclite, its output is capable of being concentrated to such a small projected spot that it rivals those flashlight products equipped with a turbo lamp assembly.

I began evaluating this category flashlights in 1998; providing written results of my findings. One criteria that I use and have found to be a practical standard measurement is what I call the DSR . This unit of measure is the Distance to Spot Ratio. Is is the ratio of the distance (feet) between the lens of the flashlight and the torso of the target to the diameter of the light product projected spot as displayed on the torso of the average (defined as a 5' 9", 160 lb.) male.

The DSR does not account for such technical measures as lumen and/or peak beam candlepower. In over 40 years of using a portable, handheld flashlight in conjunction with a firearm, I never heard anyone say "...ooh, I was successful at stopping the perpetrator with the assistance of 35 peak beam candlepower estimated at 142.5 lumens." I have, however, heard "...yeah I painted his chest with d'light before I dropped his sorry *** with a .45 Corbon" (unofficially, of course).

Among other publications, I believe that credit goes to the FBI's annual Uniform Crime Report (UCR) for establishing that the typical defensive civilian handgun firefight occur at an average (i.e. mode; for you statistically-inclined) distance of 21 feet. The average (median) width of an adult male torso is about 2 feet. If the distance when the flashlight was used was 21 feet and diameter of the projected spot on the torso is 2 feet, the DSR is 10.5:1.

Flashlights with DSRs of greater than 15 risk not providing enough spill or area lighting that establishing field of fire is more difficult without ambient, parasitic lighting. DSRs of less than 6 entails that throw is inadequate and places the operator too close to the target. Remember that what remains constant is that the desired hotspot is 2 feet or less in diameter at a minimum fighting distance of 21 feet.

Have I obfuscated the topic enough? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif

I am a member of several other internat BBs that regularly discuss fighting methods and techniques. I have only posted to this BB in the last 18 months. I am certain that a few CPF members whom are also members of those BBs will refer to this post with much amusement.

Folks, DSR is nothing fancy. It is not something that I regularly think about; certainly not if I find myself in a circumstance when I have to use a firearm. It is a concept that has allowed me to choose the performance from a flashlight that I feel that I will eventually need in order to survive an altercation involving the use of a firearm. It is a performance criteria that I have already determined and have trained with so that if and when that unfortunate scenario occurs, I feel that I already have the tools to help me survive.

To those technical types on this BB that will dissect the DSR info, please keep in mind that the operator will have about 1.5 seconds to decide when to pull the trigger. Is your flashlight's performance suitable to the task?

Anyway, on to frst impressions...

The PR head is much smaller than the existing CPF photos depict it to be mainly because the Surefire E2 boby is tiny. The length of the entire light is about 5 inches. The width of the palms of my hands is 5 inches. I can wrap my hands completey around the entire light so that in certain angles, it cannot be seen by the casual observer. This is an advantage to some and a disadvantage to a few like me. I can "palm" a basketball. There is not much to hold on to with the PR917*E2.

The color of the PR head is flat and almost appears to be a really dark OD as compared to the E2 body's shiny black annodizing. LED looks a little out of place sitting deep within the modified stochactic Pelican reflector; looking almost like the base of a burned-out bulb. The shiny collar and tab are striking in color next to the all that black annodizing. My preference is black (surprise, surprise) for these parts.

The belt clip, also in black is of the highest quality that I have used. I have carried many cell phones and 2 way radios with with various clips of questionable performance. The lithmus test is is to clip a light, radio, or phone and determine if the clip will stay on your belt when you first sit in your automobile seat. I tried this one and it never failed to dislodge from my heavy 1.25-inch width double-lined sharskin belt.

The fit and finish of the PR head is flawless; attesting to the maker's deft touch with a lathe. The maker is in the same league as custom craftsmen such as Reeve & Mayo (blades), Rosen & Sparks (leather), & Baer & Brown (1911s) [just to name a select few whom I have had the pleasure of sampling their work].

The DSR measurement will take place as night falls.

The maiden field test will occur when I visit with a friend at a large metropolitan airport tonight.

All this for a flashlight, you say. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

So far, I like what has been provided to me. The true test is when the PR917*E2 dukes it out with the ASP Taclite tonight.

To paraphrase Charlie's (MrBulk) quote; "...none of this will matter in a..." week. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif


DETAILED ANALYSIS
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
DISTANCE to SPOT RATIO (DSR)
Definition: The ratio of the distance (feet) between the lens of the flashlight and the torso of the target to the diameter of the light product projected spot as displayed on the torso of the average (defined as a 5' 9", 160 lb.) male.

The DSR of the PR-917*E2 is almost exactly 10.5:1 @ 21 feet. This is ideal. The spot is round with some abberations at the edges. There is no visible secondary image or ghosting light spot, but there is definitely spill of light wherein surrounding objects are also readily identifyable.

Contrast this to the ASP Taclite's 21:1 DSR @21 feet. At 21 feet, the hotspot is ~12 inches, however, there is a secondary and detectable hotspot that illuminates surrounding objects. At 30 feet, the Taclite DSR is still at 20:1 with the main hotspot enlarging to only ~18 inches in diameter.

Don told me before I received the light that there is a slight greenish tint on the output. When I first activated it, I could not detect it. Likely because I've been accustomed to the yellow-ish colors of the incandescent products that I've in the last 40 years. As I sustained the comparison to the Taclite's spot, the PR-917's output began to look more white. Or is it that the Taclite's was looking more yellow? It was only after I looked at the PR917 output repeatedly and exclusively that I finally noticed the color variation. The very slight greenish speckles give the output a "polar ice" tint. It didn't take long for me to get acclimated to this vast color improvement.

CARRYABILITY
Definition: The ease and convenience with which the user can transport the product; whether in a gear bag, briefcase, or belt sheath/pouch/holster.


POCKETABILITY
Definition: The ease and convenience with which the user can transport the product in a shirt, trouser, jacket, or coat pocket.


HANDGUN GRIP
Definition: The operator's ability to utilize the product in conjunction with the use of a handgun. For this size of tactical and category, the product will be evaluated with the Harries, Rogers/Surefire, and Neck Index techniques that will be described separately noting the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Harries
Description: .

Rogers/Surefire
Description: .

Neck Index
Description: .


IMPACT DEVICE
Definition: .

METHOD of OPERATION
Description: .

POWER SUPPLY
Description: .



DURABILITY
Descrition: This portion of the evaluation will necessarily be long term. My set critera is 90 days. Many employers often use this period to evalaute the performance of new employees before officially accepting them as permanent members of the organization. Very much like the employee on the probationary period, the product will need to exhibit as many of its desirable characteristics in order to impress the operator/user.


MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPORT
Description: Since this a custom product, repair support is NOT expected.


RELIABILITY
Description: .
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

I am interested to hear/see some more about your findings. I just received my tiny Arc LSHF-P and am amazed at the amount of light this little thing puts out. Now I am wanting more in small EDC packages.

Any pictures/beamshots of your test would be cool to see.

Thanks
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

Wow! Sounds like Don's Porsche Head goes military /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif ...

A question about DSR out of curiosity (not that I had ever touched a gun): this concept does not seem to take into consideration the total light output (lm) of the light, meaning that a more flood-like beam (think L4) that puts out very much light would score badly in this concept while it will light up the chest of the victim quite well including the rest of the body and the surroundings, too. Am I missing something, is spill light not wanted in such applications? To my simple mind it would seem that a huge flood would actually make it easier to kill the victim since he cannot easily escape the light ...

bernhard
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

bernhard,

Think of the laser "sight" in firearms applications. Those low-powered lasers don't provide much product light output. Instead, those devices concentrate what little light output they provide into a very narrow beam so that it can very precisely project the spot into a very specific area. Rather than illuminating everything, why not just the target? If one operator is tasked with ID and another with "contact," it will make easier for the contact operator to do his job; especially if the target is surrounded by non-targets. Remember that in such scenarios, you got 1.5 seconds to ID. There should be a modicum amount of light projected as well so that the target does not "bob and weave" out of the fire tunnel. Remember, too, that I am referring to using the hotspot to ID.

Updated first post to indicate the DSR.
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

ah ... yes.
thanx KT !
bernhard

btw ... your new handle/name is a real heavy hitter /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

Mr Long Line,

I'm glad you got the light! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif Between your hands and Al's feet, I don't know if I ever want to meet you two on bad terms! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif Should you decide you like the collar and tab for carry, I think I can get some of the raw brass parts black oxidized. The criteria you have laid out for the tactical requirements of the flashlight are interesting as well as informative. Given your hand size and past satisfaction with the 6P, I think the L5 would be a good candidate for your application. I look forward to your findings, I think. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

Don,

I'm gonna have to post about the PR917's journey to me. Like the luggage with the stickers from different countries plastered on its side, this PR917 should have State Seals all over its battery tube.🙂

That tab is begging for some type of lanyard. I ordinarily carry this size of light in my trouser pockets, but I might need one for my next trip.

I gonna step out in a few minutes to visit an old friend. I let my grandson play with it and he just "ID'd" himself in the left eye./ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ooo.gif He's on the floor crying now and his mother is headed over to where we are and she looks miffed. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/help.gif

Grandpa exits stage left. Yikes! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

Sounds like a budding flashaholic to me! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif You want lanyards, we got lanyards! Of course I don't know from DSR when it comes to tactical lanyard requirements! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

Grandson OK now. Grandpa in the doghouse with daughter-in-law./ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif

Of course, the lanyard will need to be black./ubbthreads/images/graemlins/naughty.gif

My son just provided what looks to be a serviceable idea. He just snapped a Fixed Eye Snap Shackle
bp2470.jpg
around the tab and it looks like it was made for it.

Talk about a surprise. I never knew he was so interested in stuff like this. I didn't know they made snap shackles this small.
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

Hey,

The Wichard 2470 is a great little shackle! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif The chandlery I used to manage thought I was crazy bringing these into stock but since I was the largest consumer of them, they got the picture.

wrist-lanyard-snap.jpg


It's a great part but not cheap.

EDIT: You might want to consider a soft attach on the light inboard of the tab. A simple loop with a toggle works pretty darn good. There is also the 1/4"x20 tapped hole in the collar. I'll fabricate up something tomorrow to show you that I think is better yet....
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

Definitely looking towards this review. I've asked numerous people about this application including Don and no one was certain about it /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif.

I suspect it's doable given enough flux, but they're not common enough for me to just go out to buy and try.
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 1st Impressions

I thought I'd put a photo of the darlin' in here.
BC
standard.jpg
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 Ongoing Review Draft

I have entered additional categories that will lay the foundation for this review. Thanks for the photo.
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/Surefire E2 Ongoing Review Dr

KT,

For the E2, one lanyard attachment method would be a swivel post added to the collar as shown below:

lanyard-ring.jpg


I don't know if this would be in the way for certain methods of holding the light with a gun or not. I have found that the tab makes it easier for me to use the light in a "syringe" manner but again, I know nothing of tactical deployment and don't even pretend to on TV. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/E2 Ongoing Review Draft

The early afternoon provided plenty of entertainment at the expense of the PR-917*E2. An ordinarily very serious group of young men allowed a senior citizen to pierce their inner circle. They let me play with some of their toys provided the I brought one of my own to share.

The PR-917*E2 quickly became the topic of conversation and drew fire from all sides with comments such as "...hey pops, I know budgets are shrinkin', but this is gettin' pretty bad" to "...uhm, you'll need something a leeetle bigger to play with us."

When I passed it around, somebody said "...uh, I think the bulb shattered. I hope you bought a spare." I said nah, that is a LED flashlight. To which a senior member quipped "...you mean one of these as he pulled a necklace from his shirt on which a Photon was attached. "Oooookay!" he blurted as he laughed heartily. "Let's see whatcha got."

I guess some folks HAVE learned that you don't purposely point modern, high-powered flashlights at your OWN eyes or those on your side while the switch in the on position. Instead, he aimed it at the palm of his hand. In the brightly lit room with the window shades up and the sun still brightly shining, McGizmo's custom creation did not fail to impress. In a room filled with more **** and vinegar than I had seen in a VERY long time and where the uniform of the day was Surefire (M2s, M3s, Z2s and an ample amount of old 9Ps mainly on the older contigent), the puny PR917*E2 looked like a 1st grader's attempt to fit in wid da guys. Hell, physical dimension-wise, it might as well have been a Mag Solitaire.

Into a darker room we went and the bevy of Surefires plastered the spartan concrete walls. Brightness and volume-wise a Sufire M3T dominated the show and upstaged everything else including the PR917. This wasn't a show of brute force, but rather a demonstration of the improvement of the LED flashlight's performance. Once member finally conceded to the improved performance by finally showing a Surefire L4 tucked discretely in his shirt; unbeknownst to everyone else.

The topic became a serious one as the young man and me presented the merits of LEDs mainly in the context of reliability and reduced operating costs. Mind you, this group does not worry about operating costs as I was shown a large box of spare lamp assemblies and a HUUUGGGE case of Surefire 72-pack SF 123s. They were, however, interested in the LED not susceptible to blowing.

"Yeah, but can it putt?," blurted another senior member. Hooakay, Tiger Woods, I said. Off to the driving range we went. Uniform of the day was NATO 9mm ball in all steel Sig P226s. Hot stuff! Into a Harries grip went the PR917 in my hands, though 3 magazines, and with double-taps as quickly as I could manage. I passed the little guy around and by the time I got it back, the tab was gone, the collar retaining screw was ready to fall off, the collar itself was noticeably LOOSE, and the light no longer functioned. Ooops. Oh well, I haven't had crow for lunch in a long while. Might as well rekindle my taste for it. My new friend with the L4 said I should have brought a Surefire. I wanted to say that it was part Surefire, but decided to hold out until I evaluated the light.

More later.
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/E2 Ongoing Review Draft

ut oh! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif

EDIT: It sounds like I may need to pull the "tactical" claims off of my glossy packaging until which time I can determine what gave out? I suppose testing with real guns would be a good idea too? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif Pass the crow please....... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif

As to the collar and tab, not knowing if you would even be interested in it, I did NOT install the set screw with Loc-Tite which would normally be the "right" thing to do. My Bad.

This has been very interesting and enlightening so far! I am embarrased that the build did not hold up but then this is the first time, to my knowledge, that these lights have been subjected to testing in this application. Even with the failure of this light, hopefully you were able to see what the Luxeon III and an appropriate reflector had to offer. Certainly a solid state package can be provided with proper design considerations for your application and withstand the rigors involved. Mind you, I defer to the real experts on this; you know, the guys who made the back end of that light. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif

Dang, Sorry!
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/E2 Ongoing Review Draft

Hold the apologies, Don. It is me that needs to apologize. I could not finish my last post. This is a holiday and time for families. Just before I ended my last post, I was reminded by my daughter-in-law that I promised my two older grandkids that traveled many hours with their parents to spend the holidays with us that I would take them to a movie.

We were scheduled to see Lord of the Kings. When we got to the theater, they were sold out. DOG HOUSE for the second time with daughter-in-law. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/help.gif

Anyway, I pressed the tailswitch and it did not work. Ohhh, that first bite of crow is nasty. I shrugged and placed it in my coat pocket never bothering to test it RIGHT THEN. I said aw well and whipped out the ASP Taclite and went on to test some other things. My new friend with the L4 handed my a M6 and said "shoudda brought one of these." You guys actually USE one of these? He said "...nahhhhh, too fu**ing BIG! Youd hafta have hands like yours to use it. It just sits around. We all play with it during lunch."

I pressed the M6's switch and it didn't work. "Probably dead batteries, it's got only 2 minutes run time" the yong man said as he picked-up a broom to sweep up the now thick pile of brass on the floor. Ten, ten minutes I murmured. Out of curiosity, I twisted the switch, pressed it and it worked. One of the senior guys walked past me and quipped "...ahh, damn thing still works. We all tried messing with it and we couldn't get it to fire." It was just the switch in the wrong position, I quitely said. I thought to myself, oooookay, rocket scientists they're not. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon23.gif

Another young lad walked by, the same one whom last used the PR917 said "I was the one that backed-off the switch so that the batteries wouldn't die while rolling around in the drawer. I did that with your light, too." I quickly grabbed the PR917 out of my pocket, immediately noticed that it was locked-out! Twisted the switch and it worked fine. Just then, the L4 owner handed me the tab that he picked up from the mound of brass.

I removed the set screw and switch, removed the collar, and placed them along with the tab in my shirt pocket.

The PR917 survived round 1 and was now ready for more testing.

Stay tuned. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/E2 Ongoing Review Draft

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

KT,

Needless to say, this is a relief to hear but I think giving thought to what might have failed was a good exercise for me anyway. It is one thing to do the best you can with materials available and a rudimentary understanding of them. It is something else to build with a false sense of confidence and no empirical testing to back up a design. I know what the PR-917 can do when it works and am comfortable that its build is adequate for most applications. I am also clueless as to where its ultimate failure points are or if they can be reached by a normal, albeit rigorous, useage. I look forward to your next installment and hope it's not another cliff hanger! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

EDIT: I am glad that I was wrong on what I had assumed was the failure point. My concern is that the PCB could be compromised by shock. Because of this, The E-can has a shoulder which I believe would ultimate bear the load of the shock and not the PCB. In a destructive crush, my intent is for the anode contact of the forward battery to collapse to the point that the shoulder of the battery contacts the E-can. It is my hope that the PCB can take the force required to collapse the anode contact. I could confirm this in a press but that is not the same as a high force shock load. I suppose I could set up a light and then send it flying by hitting the tail switch with a baseball bat but uh, my R&D budget is a bit weak right now. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/broke.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon15.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/E2 Ongoing Review Draft

Don,

Apologies for the cliff-hanger and what seems to be another after my last post. I brought along a voice recorder to log some notes, but quickly found it useless other than recording various bang-bang-BOOM-bangbangbangbangbangbangbang. I quickly resorted to a wallet pen and some scrap paper I found on a table beside the various empty boxes of Surefire SF123s.

I gotta admit to being a bit presumptious about the PR917's would be failure. Instead of IMMEDIATELY looking for what had happened to it, I merely shoved it in my pocket. It's taking me a bit to sort out the ad hoc notes. I wanted to gather my thoughts before posting again.

Incidentally, I received 6 email messages about this review. Two were from 2 CPF members who know more about the application under which I am currently testing the PR917 than their posts ON CPF lead us to beleive. The remaining four are from those that I know whom are NOT CPF members and have asked if I intended to make this review an official document. By explicit request, I will not indentify those two CPF members. My answer to the question about the review is that it is intended for MY edification. My reviews are normally filled with much more technical info on the items with which the flashlight under review will necessarily be used. My reviews are also normally devoid of other fluff (as one of those CPF members stated). Flashlights have been a very serious subject for me, however, CPF is as close to a hobby for me as I have known in the last 20 years.

As to the seriousness of what I have posted ABOUT the PR917, those four non-CPF members know it is. To those two CPF members, I will not ask that you accept the results for anything other than entertainment. This is coming from somebody that doesn't even have CPF name and cannot establish any credibility. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
Re: McGizmo PR-917 w/E2 Ongoing Review Draft

KT,

I can't help on the credibility issue but if you need some credit, I can forward some e-mails I recently received...... Oh yeah, is your size a problem? I can also forward some.....

OK, serious for a second here. I have found your review so far to be very enlightening and since I like many others here probably, don't know S from S when it comes to tactical, it is interesting to consider the needs and dependence on reliability of a product when lives are on the line! Interestingly, the PR917 was handed back to you in a non-functioning mode and you pocketed it as such. Had this occurred in something other than a test, the assumption that there was something wrong with the light could have had dire consequences! I think this illustrates just how important the confidence in a tool is! I believe SF, for instance has worked hard to earn their reputation and trust. This is not without the expensive proposition of serious field testing and the use of premium materials and construct. There have been conversations on CPF about what constitutes tactical and I get a kick out of some of the E-bay lights with "military" style or design. Heck, I am half confident that the PR-917 will pass your tests. I get that half confidence from the fact that half the light is SF. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
 
Back
Top