Ok, a few things. I'll attempt to address them in order.
-EZO: Firstly, good look on the entire E series. I can definitely see myself being separated from my hard earned cash in the very near future. All your fault, man. Secondly, glad that the good folks in the Vermont legislature (along with those in Alaska and Arizona) continue to uphold our rights by allowing their states constitutions to protect individuals by not requiring permits to carry concealed.
Hey JDest, If it's all my fault I sure hope it works out well for both of us 'cause whatever path the new Tiablo E series leads down I'm sure we'll meet up there.......with less cash in our pockets but at least the path should be well lit! Sometimes I think CPF needs a new discussion category....like some kind of 12 step program for flashaholics. (Nah, that would spoil all the fun.)
Yeah, it is interesting about the Vermont Constitution but our legislature has never really had much to do regarding gun rights since the right to bear arms was written into our state Constitution all the way back in 1777. If only our founding fathers had written the U.S. Constitution to be as clearly worded as the Vermont document it would likely have saved us all a lot of trouble in this country.
Vermont Constitution: ARTICLE 16th "That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State".
Vermont has a long interesting history of forward thinking and progressive law making. (Along with a lot of gaps and a few dumb ideas.) The Vermont Constitution, back in 1777, was the first to abolish slavery, for example. (curiously exempting those under 21 or anyone willing to be a slave)
Chapter 1 ARTICLE 1 : "That all persons are born equally free and independent, and have certain natural, inherent, and unalienable rights, amongst which are the enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety; therefore no person born in this country, or brought from over sea, ought to be holden by law, to serve any person as a servant, slave or apprentice, after arriving to the age of twenty-one years, unless bound by the person's own consent, after arriving to such age, or bound by law for the payment of debts, damages, fines, costs, or the like."
OK, so I realize I am veering dangerously off the original thread topic at hand so please I hope everyone will indulge me. Let us return now to our regularly scheduled programming. (Hey, this was all DHart's fault 'cause of his photos, right?)