Nichia 219 lumen sphere testing

foxtrot824

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
636
Location
The 02135!
The Nichia NVSL219AT-H1 otherwise known as the 219 92+ CRI emitter has been a treat to the flashlight community so I decided to do a quick test in the small sphere :)

mAvwlmlm/wCCTxyCRI
1002.8060.280635.09125.0745020.36090.364689.2
2002.9480.589568.27115.8045260.35990.363189.1
3003.0560.91799.31108.3045360.35930.361889.1
3503.0991.084114105.1045430.3590.361289.2
4003.141.256128.2102.0745500.35880.360489.2
5003.2161.608155.596.7045590.35830.359389.4
6003.281.968180.991.9245660.35790.35889.6
7003.3382.3366204.687.5645730.35740.356889.8
8003.3942.7152226.783.4945830.3570.355690
9003.443.096247.479.9145880.35660.354390.4
10003.4863.486266.276.3645970.35620.353190.7
11003.5363.8896284.873.2246040.35570.351891
12003.5784.2936300.469.9646130.35530.350691.4
13003.6174.7021314.366.8446220.35490.349291.8
14003.6565.1184326.363.7546310.35440.347992.2
15003.6945.541336.460.7146420.35390.346692.7
20003.8867.772360.246.3547180.35090.339594.9



I was curious to see how the emitter performed through out it's recommended current range. While it has a lovely tint and great CRI it's, however performance drops below 100 lumens per watt pretty fast.

Below is a chart of the CCT shift as current increases.

 
Last edited:

Illum

Flashaholic
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
13,053
Location
Central Florida, USA
The Nichia 219 safely operating at 2A is news to me. On their datasheet the maximum threshold for continuous operation is 1.5A. Huge dip on the 2A efficacy though. How are you cooling this little bugger?
 

foxtrot824

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
636
Location
The 02135!
The Nichia 219 safely operating at 2A is news to me. On their datasheet the maximum threshold for continuous operation is 1.5A. Huge dip on the 2A efficacy though. How are you cooling this little bugger?

Not sure about safely :) If I remebered correctly the data sheet says it can be pulsed at 2A but not continuous. The jig that holds the LED on a star in the port of the sphere has some mass to it so the LED being tested stays cool for a short time. It doesn't stay cool for long so all of these numbers were pretty much just an instant on test.
 

THE_dAY

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
1,819
Location
sfv, california
Thank you for the tests, really great info there!

Have you done any burn-in on the 219. I was wondering if this LED can have the Vf drop a bit.
 

jtr1962

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Messages
7,506
Location
Flushing, NY
Thank you for doing this! I've been curious about the Nichia 219's lumen output myself but haven't had the time to do a lumens test. Vf does seem a bit high although I suspect that will drop to 2.9V or so @ 350 mA after a few thousand hours. Yes, these aren't efficiency champs but then again no high-CRI LED is by its nature. In general illumination applications running the 219 at 350 to 500 mA seems to be the sweet spot which will deliver reasonable efficiency while still keeping the number of LEDs relatively small. It might be interesting to compare the efficiency of Nichia 219s versus a setup using standard whites plus red/cyan to deliver similar CRI. The latter might have a 10% or 15% edge in efficiency, but at the expense of circuitry to actively balance the output.
 

Hoop

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
316
Location
Spokane, WA
Perhaps you could run the led at a constant 1 amp for a while and see how the voltage fluctuates as the heatsink temp increases? I am not sure that instant on readings are an accurate reflection of the operating voltages?
 

neutralwhite

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
3,202
Location
London Heathrow
thanks. by the way what is the Lumen output on the basic Eiger pocket torch neutral white/medium optic?.
they use the Nicha 219 LED right?. or am I lost ?.
thanks.
 

foxtrot824

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
636
Location
The 02135!
thanks. by the way what is the Lumen output on the basic Eiger pocket torch neutral white/medium optic?.
they use the Nicha 219 LED right?. or am I lost ?.
thanks.

I am not sure what their stock drive current is and or optic losses are. This was strictly an at the emitter test, sorry.

Perhaps you could run the led at a constant 1 amp for a while and see how the voltage fluctuates as the heatsink temp increases? I am not sure that instant on readings are an accurate reflection of the operating voltages?

Next chance I have I'll do some longer test. The LED is currently just running at low current to get some hours on it.
 

THE_dAY

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
1,819
Location
sfv, california

foxtrot824

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
636
Location
The 02135!

gunga

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
8,080
Location
Vancouver, BC, Canada
I'd find it useful to go as low as 5-10 mA. I am setting up levels for custom circuits (eg. gdup etc) and would like reasonably accurate estimates instead of trying to read very vague charts. This information is much appreciated!
 

Beacon of Light

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Messages
2,054
+1

I'd find it useful to go as low as 5-10 mA. I am setting up levels for custom circuits (eg. gdup etc) and would like reasonably accurate estimates instead of trying to read very vague charts. This information is much appreciated!
 

PCC

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
2,326
Location
Sitting' on the dock o' The Bay...
Nice that you publish the measurements at 100mA intervals. It's increasing by about 30 lumens per 100mA at the low end and it increased by 10 lumens from 1400mA to 1500mA. Looks like there's not much to gain after about 1300mA.
 

fnj

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
555
I'd find it useful to go as low as 5-10 mA. I am setting up levels for custom circuits (eg. gdup etc) and would like reasonably accurate estimates instead of trying to read very vague charts. This information is much appreciated!

I would be VERY grateful for testing down to at least as low as 5 mA. I would be ECSTATIC if you would go down to 0.5 mA or even 0.1 mA. At least intensity if not CCT and CRI down there. Don't need a whole lot of data points; just enough to see if trends continue, or perhaps some reverse. I suppose measurements might get dicey at extremely low levels, but the information is of great interest to me. I am a fan of extra low; I know you couldn't tell that. :D
 
Top