NiMH die after 8 months (Test results)

MrAl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 9, 2001
Messages
3,250
Location
New Jersey
Hello there,


This discussion is related to constant slow charging of NiMH cells
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The cells are rated 2200mAh and
they were on charge at 90ma 24/7 for the past 8 months, and
they worked fine in a shaver up until now, when a few days ago
they failed.


A while back i had a problem with a shaver of mine that took two
tiny NiCd cells (not NiMH cells). Not only did i not feel like buying
any of them nor did i feel like replacing the cells in the shaver with
tiny little things that hold little charge, i also happened to have some
AA NiMH cells, made by "Digital", that i wasnt using. I had four of them,
and i used two of them in the shaver (it takes two cells, although not
really that size). Of course the shaver had to be physically modified,
but i did *not* modify the charger, even knowing that i was going to
now use NiMH instead of NiCd. Normally i would never do this, but
i felt i could get away with it if i called the whole thing a 'test', and
i would then actually get some results about what happens when
a NiMH is charged continuously for 24/7.


Ok, that was 8 months ago, and now after that 8 months i had to
replace the cells again because they would no longer hold enough
charge to shave even for a minute with.
As mentioned, the charge rate was 90ma and that's very low for
cells of this capacity, but it worked for 8 months and then the
cells gave out.

So i guess if anyone plans on doing this they have some idea what
to expect now, i know i do.

BTW, the cells were fairly new when they were first installed,
cycled maybe 15 times max. Also, they do not get warm at all.

Because my main test was to see how long they would last, and i
did that and found out, i made no attempt to charge them up
using a standard quick charge (1 or 2 amps) nor a fast 4 amp charge.
I might do that next, just to see if they work if they were charged
with a heavy current after being charged with such a light current
for so long. The standard charge for these cells is 150ma slow or
higher at 1.4 amps for fast.

Also interesting is that they lasted this long, realizing that they
were constantly being overcharged, day after day. This must
say something about slow charging, at say 150ma for 20 hours
or maybe the 90ma for longer. I guess it works to some degree,
even without end of charge detection, because these cells were
running 24 hours a day. If i only charged them when they needed it,
like say once a week, at 90ma for say 40 hours (just to be sure)
i wonder how long they would have lasted. Since 40 is close to
48 hours, which is two days, i guess we could say they might have
lasted around 7/2 or 3.5 times longer, which is 28 months.
28 months wouldnt be too bad i guess, considering they could
be charged with a small diode and a small wall wart and one
small resistor!
 
Last edited:
If they couldn't last a minute after eight months, then deffinately they started loosing capacity/life some time before.

Do you have cells of the same capacity to see how long the shaver will run on a good pair? This way we'd get an idea of how bad the 1 min runtime is. On the other hand, if you plan to do this test again, do a full runtime test when you put in the cells, and again after a 2 week period (or less time if you want more info,) do the runtime test again to get an idea of the degradation of the cells.

MrAl said:
If i only charged them when they needed it,
like say once a week, at 90ma for say 40 hours (just to be sure)
i wonder how long they would have lasted. Since 40 is close to
48 hours, which is two days, i guess we could say they might have
lasted around 7/2 or 3.5 times longer, which is 28 months.
WRT the above, when you use the shaver, I'm sure the cells wouldn't be completely drained when you're done so unless you're shaving so often to drain the cells completely in one week, I'd think that 40 hrs charge time would still be too much. Maybe you can drain the cells before charging....anyhow, I'm thinking too much. :wave:
 
Hi again,

Yeah that's not a bad idea (runtime tests).
I guess i wanted to use it the way the manual says...leave it in the holder
when not being used, but then again i could take it out.

I guess the thing to do would be to check the current drain while the
shaver is running, like for five minutes for a typical shave, then calculate
the charge time to see how long it needs to charge to replenish the charge
removed from shaving for one morning. It has to get at least enough charge
to get it ready for the next morning.

I guess i got lazy with this too, in that i want to just leave it in the dang
holder and forget about it. If the cells die then change them (hee hee).
Would be good to do a few tests as you suggest however, that way they
will last even longer assuming 90ma is far too much for 24 hours (until the
next shave say).

I also was curious to see how long they would last with a constant charge like
that, so it was worth wasting the cells. They were cheap anyway, and i have
two more that i just installed the other day. I dont use them for anything else
anyway and they wont charge in the Energizer 15 minute charger.
Now that i know how long they last it would be better though to try to make
this second set last longer...but then again, he he, i have other fairly cheap
cells that i dont use anymore either due to the better cells i found after that.

My Duracells 2050 work really well...low self discharge even though they are
not that type really. Energizer 2500's are crap though, as they discharge so
quickly. I have them sitting on a shelf discharged trying to figure out what
to do with them.

Next up to go in the shaver would be the RS cells i got, which bite too.
I think they are only 1800's but they drain down faster than that.

Well anyway, thanks for the ideas.
 
Hello Al,

Interesting...

GP states that their cells can withstand a year charging at 0.1C. Your cells only seem to be charging at 0.04C, if 2200 mAh was their true capacity. I was just looking at the Duracell NiMh handbook and they suggest 0.003C as a long term trickle charge.

If you happen to want to do the test again, I would suggest that you do a discharge to establish the true capacity of the cells, and check them each month to see how their performance holds up.

I wonder if they will recover at all...

Tom
 
Hello Al,

You posted while I was writing.

This may be an excellent place to use your high self discharge Energizer 2500 cells...

Tom
 
Hi Tom,

Well, in the shaver application the cells have to be more than trickle charged,
because charge is lost due to self discharge and also through the normal use of the
charger, so i would think they would need more than just a trickle charge.
Isnt trickle charging just to keep the cells topped off, due to the self discharge?

But anyway, yes, that's a good idea with the E 2500 cells...i would be able to
use them with the shaver and self discharge would not matter because they
would be getting a charge 24 hours a day...he he.
It's too bad i didnt start this thread sooner because i already replaced the
two cells with the other two Digital brand cells i had. Next time, however,
maybe the Energizer 2500's and that would get some use out of them.
I did pay 13 dollars for those cells too, which is a little high by todays standards.
In fact, closer to $13.50 i think because i bought them at a drug store (not
the best prices around). I saw them and i thought, "oh yeah wow, that should
run a light a good amount of time", ha ha. Then i found out about the self
discharge :-( On the plus side, Energizer sent a 10 dollar coupon which i ended
up getting four of their AAA NiMH (900mAh) which worked out pretty good
because i had a light that i like to use quite a bit that uses three AAA cells.
No way was i going to use the coupon for the 2500 cells, but now that i think
about it, it would have been funny to keep calling Energizer to tell them how
the coupon they sent, which was used to buy more 2500 cells, only ended up
giving me more cells with ultra high self discharge HA HA. Eventually they
would have to admit something here or they would be sending me coupons
forever...i have to chuckle about this a little he he. Well at least my day
started off with a laugh today :)
 
Ha ha, or ofter to shave the entire town he hee.

Reminds me of that paradox...

In my town, the barber shaves everyone who does not shave themselves.
But in that case, who shaves the barber?
 
I don't like the idea of constant charge. Have you tried discharging and re-charging a couple of times? If the crystals have grown large, that might help. Of course if the crystals have punctured the cell membrane, you are out of luck.

I don't have a shaver but I do have a battery powered toothbrush. I charge the cells every couple of months when the thing seems to be running a bit slower than it does on a full charge. I figure the cells will last for many years. They are already 5 years old.

I've had bad luck with 2500 mah cells, but I only used them in my camera, and that thing is rough on cells. The cells in my toothbrush are 1800 mah, and they seem to be good ones. On the other hand I suppose my camera could damage them.
 
Hi again,

No i havent tried that yet, or anything else. I was about to do some more
tests but caught a bad cold of some sort taking a while to get over.
I still have the cells so i will test them soon.
The other cells i used to replace them with are doing fine.
 
Top