OLight Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded SS R5

HKJ

Flashaholic
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
9,715
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
[SIZE=+3]OLight Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded[/SIZE]

DSC_6985.jpg


DSC_7000.jpg


OLight is manufacturing many different flashlight and does also work together with other flashlight manufacturers (4Sevens and ITP). The OLight mini is the ITP EOS A3 light that OLight makes a special Xmas version of. The light is a 3 level AAA light with a twist on/off interface, it always starts at low and has a low-medium-high sequence. The Olight version of the light is in titanium, ITP makes the light in aluminium, stainless steel and titanium versions. In this review I will focus on the Olight version, but supplement with measurements from the ITP stainless steel R5 version.
The ITP version of this light exist both in a single level and a 3 level version (called upgraded). The light has been on the market for some time and exists with two different programs in the microprocessor, the first generation had a low frequency pwm and started with medium brightness, the current version has a high frequency pwm and starts at low.

DSC_6982.jpg


The Olight version is part of a large Xmas set. The ITP version is delivered in a small metal box with a window.

DSC_6984.jpg


In both cases the actual contents related to the AAA light is the same: the light with a keychain and claw, two spare o-rings and a manual.

DSC_6986.jpg
DSC_6987.jpg


The light has a OP (Orange Peel) reflector with the XP-G led at the bottom.

DSC_6990.jpg
DSC_6988.jpg


The head has some groves, but they are rather smooth and doe not improve the grip much. The backside of the head is the classical design with a ring and a center, this is the same design all the ITP A3 lights has used.

DSC_6992.jpg
DSC_6989.jpg


The body has well working threads and a o-ring, the battery tube has the usual spring at the bottom.

DSC_6991.jpg


The light has a removable clip, but removing it will scratch the titanium.

DSC_6993.jpg
DSC_6995.jpg


The light cannot tail stand, because it has a small post where the keychain is mounted. The keychain and claw has been improved since the first generation of A3 lights.

DSC_6997.jpg



The light with both clip and keychain removed.


DSC_6996.jpg


Here is all the part the light can be disassembled in without tools.


The light is a old design that has proved it works, but with frequent updates of the led the light does keep up with other AAA lights. The ITP aluminium version is not very expensive, making this a good buy for a AAA light. Steel cost more and the Olight titanium version is rather expensive, especially because it is part of a special edition set.



[SIZE=+2]Technical specification and measurements[/SIZE]

DSC_6998.jpg


This light is designed for 1.5 volt AAA batteries (Alkaline, NiMH, Lithium). The manual also specify that 10420 batteries (LiIon) can be used, but are not recommended, this does not match the specified maximum voltage of 3 volt (LiIon are more like 4 volt).

Measured size and weight:
Length: 69.7 mm
Diameter: 14 mm
Weight: 35.7 gram (Titanium), 43.7 gram (Steel) both measured with keychain, claw and eneloop battery.

The Olight mini uses a Cree XP-G S2 led.
The ITP EOS A3 upgrade stainless steel uses a Cree XP-G R5 led, but this light also exist with other leds.

Measurements%20Olight.png

Measurements%20ITP.png


In the above table I have used 800mAh eneloop batteries for measuring and estimating the runtime. The estimated lumen are based on the specified 80 and 95 lumen and then scaled according to measured brightness. The specified difference in lumen is to high, I measured only about 7% difference between the two light, that is about the difference between R5 and S2 led. The medium and low levels for ITP also has a wrong lumen and runtime specification.
Note: The above tables are based on values at 1.2 volt.

OLight%20Mini%20Titanium%20AAA%20S2%20High.png

ITP%20A3%20SS%20XP-G%20R5%20High.png


The light does not stabilize brightness, instead the brightness is directly proportional to the battery voltage. This keeps a more moderate current draw on the batteries and with alkaline avoids the fast brightness drop when the battery is empty.

OLight%20Mini%20Titanium%20AAA%20S2%20Medium.png

ITP%20A3%20SS%20XP-G%20R5%20Medium.png


When using medium brightness the light keeps a constant power draw, but this is not enough to stabilize the brightness

OLight%20Mini%20Titanium%20AAA%20S2%20Low.png

ITP%20A3%20SS%20XP-G%20R5%20Low.png


When the low brightness is selected the light is stabilized.

Runtime.png


On the runtime curve the lack of stabilization is obvious on high, but not very visible on medium. These small AAA lights do not work well on high with alkaline.

Medium%20pwm.png


The light uses pwm for regulation of brightness, the frequency is about 2.4 kHz, i.e. not visible (The first generation ITP used a much lower frequency). The above scope trace is from medium brightness on Olight.

Low%20pwm.png


The low pwm is only a spike.





[SIZE=+2]Comparison to other Flashlights[/SIZE]

Olight Xmas 2009 XP-E Q5, Olight Xmas 2010 XP-G S2, Klarus Mi10 XP-E R2
DSC_6568a.jpg
DSC_6569a.jpg
DSC_6570a.jpg


Fenix E05 XP-G R4, 4Sevens Preon ReVO SS XP-G R4 NW, 4Sevens Preon Ti XP-G R5
DSC_6564a.jpg
DSC_6565a.jpg
DSC_6566a.jpg


For the full comparison to other lights with graphs and beamshots see here.
 
Last edited:
Another great review. you are right, the runtime of med and low of the ITP are so OFF from their official speciafication!!!
 
I like Your review, thanks!

It would have been nice to see the EOS R5 beamshot in the same environment as Olight S2.

Measured weights are with keychain and claw and with battery (type?). The weight of my EOS R5 alu-version with Energizer Lithium and wrist strap is 21 grams.

v.php
r5_2.jpg

v.php
 
Last edited:
It would have been nice to see the EOS R5 beamshot in the same environment as Olight S2.

You would probably not be able to see the difference. But I also have increased the problem with lights that look alike (That is a PITA when doing beamshots).

Measured weights are with keychain and claw and with battery (type?). The weight of my EOS R5 alu-version with Energizer Lithium and wrist strap is 21 grams.

I have changed the text, the weight was measured with a eneloop battery.
 
Red Light Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded SS R5

Great review, I really like the format of your reviews and technical / runtime / current / amps / voltage data. Makes an interesting and informative read :thumbsup:

Completely OT but the light 5th from right is an Ultrafire? Looks identical to the Lumintop Worm - do you have any more info? Do Ultrafire manufacture lights for others, or is this just another Ultrafire clone?

I presumed O-Light manufactured Lumintop, as the similarities between TD15 (X) and O-light M series is no coincidence.
 
Re: Red Light Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded SS R5

Completely OT but the light 5th from right is an Ultrafire? Looks identical to the Lumintop Worm - do you have any more info? Do Ultrafire manufacture lights for others, or is this just another Ultrafire clone?

The question is who cloned who, I got the UltraFire some time before the Worm was announced. I am curious if the Worm uses exactly the same driver and led as the UltraFire, but not curious enough to order it.
 
Re: Red Light Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded SS R5

Great review, thanks so much!!
In this post talking of the High-mode only:

At first sight the below two graphs look contradictory imho. graphX shows that all quantities (brightness, current, watt) are linearly dependent on cell voltage (under load), called "proportional". this looks catastrophic because brightness isnt held constant at all. not even current is held constant by the driver. Practically i dont see *any* kind of regulation on High-mode. Neither constant current regulation nor constant brightness regulation. The light is not regulated on High-mode, is that true?

graphX said:

In graphY we see a curve which doesnt look too bad. brightness is never constant, but between t=10...35mins brightness is "almost constant" at about ~"78". Was this not-too-bad behavior to be expected?

Looking again at the below graph, the curve reminds me of some typical battery discharge curve .. "high quality cells" have a discharge graph which looks like that! Does this mean that the iTP A3's "brightness behavior" will be ~proportional to the discharge behavior of the used cell? If i use a poor NiMH cell, then iTP A3 will perform exactly as poor?
Wow. that's poor!

graphY said:

As a final note, how would we rate the iTP A3's "quality on High-mode"? Very lacking, i guess. Maybe 2 stars out of 5? :sssh:
 
Re: Red Light Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded SS R5

As a final note, how would we rate the iTP A3's "quality on High-mode"? Very lacking, i guess. Maybe 2 stars out of 5? :sssh:

Not really. A stabilized light is bad for the batteries, especially when using small AAA batteries and drawing nearly 1A. Letting the current consumption drop with the battery voltage is a good way to get a decent runtime, together with a high brightness (on new batteries).
 
Re: Red Light Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded SS R5

AAA batteries and drawing nearly 1A
if that is their reasoning, other manufacturers wouldnt share the view. Revo, MiX6, Worm, .. they all draw more than 1.0A when the cell approaches depletion (e.g. 0.90-1.20V under load). it seems that the makers of iTP A3 didnt know of the existence of Sanyo Eneloop cells :devil:

runtimes? about that.
runtime on High isnt bad (~60mins) but there are lights which are brighter and run longer (Revo, Worm, LD01, ..).

i do have the iTP A3 and i must admit that brightness is still "quite high" when the cell drops from its voltage plateau and this non-existent regulation on Hi should be a no-brainer in one's purchase decision. interesting to note that the runtime of the new Olight i3 is even less (even by ANSI FL-1 STANDARD indication).

manufacturers -- difficult to understand their design decisions!
 
Re: Red Light Mini Titanium AAA S2 and ITP EOS A3 Upgraded SS R5

if that is their reasoning, other manufacturers wouldnt share the view. Revo, MiX6, Worm, .. they all draw more than 1.0A when the cell approaches depletion (e.g. 0.90-1.20V under load). it seems that the makers of iTP A3 didnt know of the existence of Sanyo Eneloop cells :devil:

The makers of A3 probably wanted a light that could be used on alkaline batteries.


runtimes? about that.
runtime on High isnt bad (~60mins) but there are lights which are brighter and run longer (Revo, Worm, LD01, ..).

Both Revo and LD01 does step down in brightness after a few minutes.

manufacturers -- difficult to understand their design decisions!

Not really, for mainstream lights you want to support alkaline batteries. There are a few solutions to that:
  • use low maximum brighthness
  • make it a unstabilized light
  • use stabilization with a step down

Here is a curve from a light that tried to stabilize at high brightness:
Runtime.png


It stabilizes fine with NiMH, but alkaline cannot supply enough power and it immediately drops out of stabilization.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top