P3D vs. C-LE pictures

bondr006

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
2,112
Location
Cary, NC - Land of the CREE
Here are some comparison shots of my P3D and C-LE. Both lights shot at 1 meter. f5.6 @ 15th second. The little anomaly at 8 o'clock on the inner beam is a defect in the wall, not the beam.

BTW. What are the optimal camera settings for taking beam shots on a white wall?


P3D Low 9 Lumens
88181099gz7.jpg

P3D Med 40 Lumens
38837112cd7.jpg

P3D High 90 Lumens
20896687do0.jpg

P3D Turbo 160 Lumens
31128950kf0.jpg

C-LE Low 20 Lumens
16494027vj3.jpg

C-LE Medium 40 Lumens
28123175om6.jpg

C-LE High 80 Lumens
69906883im1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Is it just me or is the 9 Lumen low, 40 lumen medium of the Fenix brighter then the 20 lumen low and the 40 lumen medium of then Jetbeam.

Nice beamshots
 
Comparing my JetBeam to other lights (Fenix) I'd have to say the lumen numbers are inflated. Instead of 20/40/80, mine is probably closer to 10/30/50, at least with NiMH batteries. Maybe those advertised values are for 14500 batts.

Geoff
 
I totally agree, my C-LE is nowhere near the claimed lumens output. Comparing it to actual lumens of tested lights, I would say 10/30/50 is a pretty accurate observation.
 
Good pics.

Locking the exposure and white balance is one of the most important things when making a comparison. The other is ensuring the hotspot does not oversaturate. That may mean changing the exposure for each brightness but ensuring it is the same for each light setting ( low, med, high).

What type of battery were you using in the C-LE?

The output is noticeably dimmer for the C-LE. However, the comparison is with a 2xCR123 flashlight. It looks like the C-LE performed pretty well considering its competition had a much larger "fuel tank". The C-LE likely sends *about* 1W to the emitter when using an alkaline/NiMH.

Paul
 
Hi chimo,

Thanks for the response. I use an e2 AA lithium in the C-LE. One thing I did notice is that the P3D high shot(90 lumen) and C-LE high shots(80 lumen) were were very similar. I wonder if the low and med shots look lower on the C-LE because of the PWM? Just a thought. Because in real life, the C-LE low and med settings look much better and comparable to the P3D low and medium.

P3D High 90 Lumens
20896687do0.jpg


C-LE High 80 Lumens
69906883im1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hey Rob,

I think you've got a good point about the PWM affecting the beamshot. That would certainly explain the apparent dimness of the CL-E. Not sure what the best way to compensate for this would be.

Geoff
 
Hey Rob,

I think you've got a good point about the PWM affecting the beamshot. That would certainly explain the apparent dimness of the CL-E. Not sure what the best way to compensate for this would be.

Geoff

Hey Geoff,

I think that has got to be what it is. The two high shots where the C-LE has no PWM are very similar. I have not found the answer to this yet or how to get decent beam shots on the lower modes of a PWM light. Anyone out there with the answer would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
If you have full exposure control of your camera, you could increase the exposure time and decrease the aperture size. That way, the exposure time will span more PWM cycles and average them better (like our eyes do).

Paul
 
If you have full exposure control of your camera, you could increase the exposure time and decrease the aperture size. That way, the exposure time will span more PWM cycles and average them better (like our eyes do).

Paul

Thanks again Paul. I will try that out and post back here to let you know how it goes.
 
Top