LoBat,
I added a link in the first post to the Pelican spec web page for the 7060.
Pilou,
The camera doesn't do any of these lights justice because it simply can't record the dynamic range that our eyes can perceive. As I stated, all of these lights did a more than adequate job of lighting up the yard for me to see. One advantage of the XR-E's distribution pattern is that it is powerfull head on and its spill beam has plenty light. Even though the 7060 had the brightest and tightest spot of the samples shown, to the naked eye, there was plenty illumination out beyond the spot. You can see in the images that the grass in the foreground is best illuminated by the 7060.
The reflector is one piece and there are some concentric waves in the surface but the ring you see is the reflection of the LED's lens retaining ring. Head on, all you see is yellow phosphor with some slight concentric rings.
As to another question of your, I believe a person could put another person in the hospital with any of these flashlights. The bezel is not sharp at all though. I don't think you could get a DNA sample with the bezel. A good knurled surface would be much more apt to tear through the skin.
*******
Although this light was categorized as obsolete and other things in the other thread, it would be dificult to compare it with a group of its peers at present because there aren't any that I am aware of. The XR-E die is a 2 amp part. I believe the 7060 is driving the LED past 1 amp but I am not concerned in principal about the health of the LED; especially in a flashlight where a few thousand hours is a long time! Assuming a reasonable thermal path from LED to heat sink, the light is not getting hot to any extent worthy of concern, IMHO.