Playing with the RadioShack 22-812 Meter

Mr Happy

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
5,390
Location
Southern California
For anyone unfamiliar with it, this is a moderately good digital multimeter you can find in RadioShack for about $70, maybe less on sale. What is really neat about it is that it has a RS232 serial interface for connecting to a computer. This means you can use it for unattended data logging!

(I have noticed the 22-812 seems to have disappeared from RadioShack's web site, suggesting it might have been discontinued. If you want one, I would suggest grabbing one quick before the remaining stock runs out.)

The meter comes with some PC software that is functional but limited, but using standard software is no fun. It also doesn't install nicely on Vista or Windows 7. What was more fun was to write my own program to capture data from the meter and record it the way I wanted. (The protocol can be found in the link at the bottom of this page).

Two meters is twice as much fun as one meter! I wrote my program to capture data from one, two or any number of meters at the same time and record all the results in a single file. If you have not got that many (or any) serial ports on your computer you will need a USB to serial port adapter for each meter (this is a good one).

Today I got all the pieces assembled and ran a real life test. Here is the result of charging a UltraLast Hybrio (not a Hybriloop) on the GP PowerBank Smart 2 charger I picked up recently. The plot shows voltage and temperature. The temperature was captured using a Fluke thermocouple adapter that was actually more expensive than the meter :crazy:, though I have to say I was seriously impressed with the quality of it. I can see why Fluke products are worth the money.

The GPPB14 charges at 2000 mA, hence the rapid charging time. It is interesting how high the voltage went. I'm going to have to charge the same cell at 2000 mA on the C9000 for comparison sometime. (Edit: The chart below shows the closed circuit voltage with the charge current present, while the C9000 displays the open circuit voltage with the charge current disconnected. The difference between the two values can be quite significant.)

Here's the pretty plot produced in Excel:

ultralasthybriogppb14.png


Notice how the −∆V signal can be seen just prior to termination, and how flat most of the voltage curve is.

Note: The code for this example is included in post #12 by request.
 
Last edited:
...Here is the result of charging a UltraLast Hybrio (not a Hybriloop) on the GP PowerBank Smart 2 charger I picked up recently. The plot shows voltage and temperature...

...The GPPB14 charges at 2000 mA, hence the rapid charging time. It is interesting how high the voltage went. I'm going to have to charge the same cell at 2000 mA on the C9000 for comparison sometime...
I don't understand the voltage curve - more precisely, I don't understand how it got over 1.47VDC so fast.

It's my understanding that when we ask a charger to charge a cell at xx mA, it varies the voltage to maintain the current. Thus, to supply 2000mA, the GP PowerBank Smart 2 had to ramp up the voltage to over 1.50VDC. Going by this graph, if you were to attempt to charge these same cells on the C9000 @ 2000mA, it appears that one would expect the C9000 to terminate on Max Voltage of 1.47VDC in about 3 minutes.

My first thought was high Internal Resistance, but since the temperature didn't begin to climb in earnest until ~45min, the cells appear healthy.

What am I missing? :thinking:

Thanks!
 
I don't understand the voltage curve - more precisely, I don't understand how it got over 1.47VDC so fast.

It's my understanding that when we ask a charger to charge a cell at xx mA, it varies the voltage to maintain the current. Thus, to supply 2000mA, the GP PowerBank Smart 2 had to ramp up the voltage to over 1.50VDC. Going by this graph, if you were to attempt to charge these same cells on the C9000 @ 2000mA, it appears that one would expect the C9000 to terminate on Max Voltage of 1.47VDC in about 3 minutes.

My first thought was high Internal Resistance, but since the temperature didn't begin to climb in earnest until ~45min, the cells appear healthy.

What am I missing? :thinking:

Thanks!
I thought exactly the same thing, and I did a test on the C9000 to find out.

It seems the voltage indicated by the C9000 when it is operating is not exactly the voltage you can see with an external voltmeter.

The voltage shown on my plot is the maximum voltage across the cell terminals when the charging current is present. However, the C9000 applies the charging current in pulses and it measures and displays the cell voltage in the intervals when the current is turned off. It is difficult for slow acting voltmeters to catch this, apparently. (The C9000 has an internal microprocessor that can coordinate the voltage measurements at exactly the right time.)

To get an idea of the difference, see how the voltage dropped from about 1.61 V to 1.53 V when the charger stopped at the end. If you subtract about 0.08 V from the whole voltage curve you will get an estimate of what voltage the C9000 is looking at.
 
Last edited:
For comparison with the previous chart, here is a similar cell charged on the C9000 at 2000 mA indicated (1800 mA actual).

ultralasthybrioc9000.png


Notable features:

  1. The voltage goes through a slight minimum between 10 and 20 minutes;
  2. Charging terminates before the −∆V point is reached due to the max voltage cut-off of the C9000, but this results in a lower peak cell temperature.
It is unfortunate I could not obtain a true 2000 mA charge rate for a direct comparison with the GPPB14. Due to the 90% duty cycle of the C9000, 90% of 2000 mA is the highest charging current that can be obtained.
 
Last edited:
A while back I used my CBAII to monitor the charge voltage of an Eneloop charged at 1000ma on my BC-900 charger. Below are the results. I may have to try the same thing with my MH-C9000. (The voltage seems a little high here also.)

EneloopAAchargeat1000ma.jpg
 
I smoothed out the spikes in my plot by picking the maximum voltage seen in each sample period, which should correspond to the closed circuit voltage when the charging current is turned on.

A peak voltage of 1.6+ V for a modern cell under high rate charge is typical, actually. The C9000 can be misleading since the voltage it displays is the open circuit voltage sampled between charging pulses.
 
Mr Happy,

Same request here as in the newer: Charging NiMH at high and low rates -- what can go wrong

Please consider revising your graph titles to include all of the relevant information:
  • Graph #1: UltraLast Hybrio AA @ 2000mA on GP GPPB14
    .
  • Graph #2: UltraLast Hybrio AA @ 2000mA on Maha C9000
This way, when someone LINKs to just the graphs, they don't have to add any details.

BTW, what is the 'condition' of the cells before the 'Experiment'? (i.e. DISCHARGED @ 0.2C on the Maha C9000 to 0.9VDC)?

Thanks!
 
Mr. Happy,
Would you be willing to share your code for the RadioShack 22-812 communication?
Thanks,
Deb
 
Mr. Happy,
Would you be willing to share your code for the RadioShack 22-812 communication?
Thanks,
Deb

FYI

Radioshack code: http://www.radioshack.com/search/softwareResults.jsp?kw=22-812

zmeter(linux): http://zmeter.sourceforge.net/
prsmeter(linux): http://prsmeter.sourceforge.net/

I haven't tried either :)

Is the Mastech MAS345 any good? It seems readily available on Amazon and looks easy to read with custom Linux scripts: http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/83/Perl_Multimeter_to%20Measure_Power_Consumption.pdf

Actually I'm thinking any RS232 multimeter will likely be easy to read - any good cheap ones ~ $50?

-PG
 
Last edited:
Mr. Happy,
Would you be willing to share your code for the RadioShack 22-812 communication?
Thanks,
Deb
Hi Deb,

My code is written in C++ and is strongly specific to Windows. It needs Visual Studio to compile it (Visual C++ Express 2008 will do).

The program is a simple command line app that logs the displayed values to a CSV file until you tell it to stop. It is neither elaborate nor richly functional. It doesn't have a graphical user interface since engineers don't need such frills :D

However, I might be willing to make it publicly available after I tidy it up a bit. Watch this space over the next week or so and we'll see what happens.
 
Here is the code referenced in the first post of this thread to collect data from the RadioShack 22-812 meter.

There are four files. These should be added to a project in Visual Studio 2008 and built as a multi-threaded command line application. I called the application rsdmm.
MeterGather.h declares a class that does the main work of opening and initializing a serial port and collecting meter data in a background thread.

MeterGather.cpp is the implementation of this class.

LogData.cpp is the driver function that launches the gathering threads in the background and then periodically logs the recorded data to a file.

main.cpp is the main program that starts everything off.
To run the program, use a command like this:

C:\Data>rsdmm 10 COM4 COM5

This will collect data from meters on COM4 and COM5 and log the results to file at 10 second intervals. To finish logging and close the file hit Ctrl-C.

The format of the log file is CSV as follows:

Timestamp (HH:MM:SS.ss), Timestamp (SS.ss), First meter: Sample count, Mean value, Min value, Max value, Second meter: etc...

This file can be read into Excel for plotting and analysis.

MeterGather.h
Code:
// Copyright (C) 2010 Mr Happy, CandlePowerForums. All rights reserved.

#define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
#define WINDOWS_LEAN_AND_MEAN

#include <windows.h>
#include <string>

class MeterGather
{
public:
  MeterGather(const std::string &port);
  ~MeterGather();
  bool Init();
  void Start();
  void End();
  void GetReadings(int &count, double &meanval, double &minval, double &maxval);
private:
  static DWORD WINAPI startThread(LPVOID p);
  void readLoop();
  bool readMessage();
  bool checksumValid();
  double getValue();
  
  static const int MessageSize = 9;

  unsigned char mBuf[MessageSize];
  std::string   mPort;
  HANDLE        hPort;
  HANDLE        hThread;
  CRITICAL_SECTION mCS1;
  bool          mEndThread;
  int           mCount;
  double        mTotal;
  double        mMinVal;
  double        mMaxVal;
};
MeterGather.cpp
Code:
// Copyright (C) 2010 Mr Happy, CandlePowerForums. All rights reserved.

#include "MeterGather.h"
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

// Construct object and initialize variables
MeterGather::
MeterGather(const string &port) 
: mPort(port), hPort(0), hThread(0), mEndThread(false),
  mCount(0), mTotal(0), mMinVal(1e20), mMaxVal(0)
{
  InitializeCriticalSection(&mCS1);
}

// Close comm port, clean up
MeterGather::
~MeterGather()
{
  if (hThread) End();
  DeleteCriticalSection(&mCS1);
}

// Open and initialize comm port for reading
// : write message to cerr and return false on failure
bool MeterGather::
Init()
{
  bool status = false;
  do
  {
    HANDLE port_handle = CreateFile( 
      mPort.c_str(),  
      GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, 
      0, 
      0, 
      OPEN_EXISTING,
      0,
      0);
                        
    if (port_handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
      DWORD code = GetLastError();
      LPVOID msgbuf;
      FormatMessage(
        FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER | 
          FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM |
          FORMAT_MESSAGE_IGNORE_INSERTS,
        NULL,
        code,
        MAKELANGID(LANG_NEUTRAL, SUBLANG_DEFAULT),
        (LPTSTR) &msgbuf,
        0, NULL );
      cerr << "Error opening port " << mPort << ": " << static_cast<LPTSTR>(msgbuf) << endl;
      break;
    }
    
    DCB dcb;
    dcb.DCBlength = sizeof(DCB);
    if (!GetCommState(port_handle, &dcb)) {
      cerr << "Error getting comm state on " << mPort << endl;
      break;
    }
    
    dcb.BaudRate = CBR_4800;
    dcb.Parity = NOPARITY;
    dcb.ByteSize = 8;
    dcb.StopBits = ONESTOPBIT;
    dcb.fDtrControl = DTR_CONTROL_DISABLE;

    if (!SetCommState(port_handle, &dcb)) {
      cerr << "Error setting comm state on " << mPort << endl;
      break;
    }

    // zero for all timeout entries means wait forever and do not time out
    COMMTIMEOUTS timeouts;
    timeouts.ReadIntervalTimeout = 0;
    timeouts.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
    timeouts.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = 0;
    timeouts.WriteTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
    timeouts.WriteTotalTimeoutConstant = 0;

    if (!SetCommTimeouts(port_handle, &timeouts)) {
      cerr << "Error setting comm timeouts on " << mPort << endl;
      break;
    }

    EscapeCommFunction(port_handle, CLRDTR);
    EscapeCommFunction(port_handle, CLRRTS);
    PurgeComm(port_handle, PURGE_RXCLEAR);
    
    hPort = port_handle;
    status = true;

  } while (0);

  return status;
}

// Start the reading thread in the background and return immediately
void MeterGather::
Start()
{
  hThread = CreateThread(
    0, 0,
    startThread, static_cast<void*>(this),
    0, 0
  );
}

// End the reading thread and wait for it to exit
void MeterGather::
End()
{
  mEndThread = true;
  WaitForSingleObject(hThread, 1000);
}

// Get the current accumulated readings and reset the accumulators
void MeterGather::
GetReadings(int &count, double &meanval, double &minval, double &maxval)
{
  EnterCriticalSection(&mCS1);
  count = mCount;
  meanval = mTotal / mCount;
  minval = mMinVal;
  maxval = mMaxVal;
  mTotal = 0.0;
  mCount = 0;
  mMinVal = 1e20;
  mMaxVal = 0.0;
  LeaveCriticalSection(&mCS1);
}

// Start the background thread for gathering meter readings
DWORD WINAPI MeterGather::
startThread(LPVOID p)
{
  MeterGather *g = static_cast<MeterGather *>(p);
  g->readLoop();
  return 1;
}

// The main method of the background meter reading loop
void MeterGather::
readLoop()
{
  double v;
  while (!mEndThread)
  {
    if (readMessage())
    {
      v = getValue();
    }
    else
    {
      Sleep(100);
      continue;
    }
    
    EnterCriticalSection(&mCS1);
    mTotal += v;
    ++mCount;
    if (v < mMinVal) mMinVal = v;
    if (v > mMaxVal) mMaxVal = v;
    LeaveCriticalSection(&mCS1);
  }
}

// Read message from serial port into buffer
bool MeterGather::
readMessage()
{
  EscapeCommFunction(hPort, SETDTR);
  DWORD nread = 0;
  ReadFile(hPort, (LPVOID)mBuf, MessageSize, &nread, 0);
  EscapeCommFunction(hPort, CLRDTR);
  if (nread != MessageSize || !checksumValid())
  {
    PurgeComm(hPort, PURGE_RXCLEAR);
    return false;
  }
  return true;
}

// Validate checksum of message
bool MeterGather::
checksumValid()
{
  const int LastByte = MessageSize - 1;
  unsigned sum = 0;
  for (int i = 0; i < LastByte; i++)
        sum += mBuf[i];
  return mBuf[LastByte] == ((sum + 0x39) & 0xFF);
}

// Get value from buffer
double MeterGather::
getValue()
{
  double v = 0.0;
  char s[8];
  char *p = s;
  if (mBuf[7] & 8) *p++ = '-';
  mBuf[6] &= ~8;
  bool have_digits = false;
  for (int i = 6; i > 2; --i)
  {
    if (mBuf[i] & 8)
    {
      *p++ = '.';
      mBuf[i] &= ~8;
    }
    char *p1 = p;
    switch (mBuf[i])
    {
      case  80: *p++ = '1'; break;
      case 181: *p++ = '2'; break;
      case 241: *p++ = '3'; break;
      case 114: *p++ = '4'; break;
      case 227: *p++ = '5'; break;
      case 231: *p++ = '6'; break;
      case  81: *p++ = '7'; break;
      case 247: *p++ = '8'; break;
      case 243: *p++ = '9'; break;
      case 215: *p++ = '0'; break;
      default:              break;
    }
    if (p > p1) have_digits = true;
  }
  *p = 0;
  if (have_digits) v = atof(s);
  if (mBuf[1] & 0x01) v *= 1e-3;
  if (mBuf[1] & 0x10) v *= 1e6;
  if (mBuf[1] & 0x20) v *= 1e3;
  if (mBuf[2] & 0x40) v *= 1e-9;
  if (mBuf[2] & 0x80) v *= 1e-6;
  return v;
}
LogData.cpp
Code:
// Copyright (C) 2010 Mr Happy, CandlePowerForums. All rights reserved.

#include "MeterGather.h"
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <sstream>
using namespace std;

namespace
{

HANDLE hExit = CreateEvent(0, FALSE, FALSE, 0);

char *
timeString()
{
  static DWORD tzero = GetTickCount();
  static char timestr[64]; // HH:MM:SS.ss, SS.ss
  DWORD delta;
  
  DWORD time = GetTickCount();
  if (time >= tzero)
    delta = time - tzero;
  else
    delta = (0xFFFFFFFFu - tzero) + time;
  int cs = ((delta % 1000u) + 5u) / 10u;
  delta /= 1000u;
  int totsec = delta;
  int sec = delta % 60u;
  delta /= 60u;
  int min = delta % 60u;
  int hr = delta / 60u;
  sprintf(timestr, "%2.2d:%2.2d:%2.2d.%2.2d, %d.%2.2d", 
            hr, min, sec, cs, totsec, cs);
  return timestr;
}

BOOL WINAPI ctrlcHandler(DWORD ctrl_type)
{
  if (ctrl_type == CTRL_C_EVENT)
  {
    SetEvent(hExit);
    return TRUE;
  }
  
  return FALSE;
}

}

int
LogData(int interval, vector<string> &ports)
{
  vector<MeterGather *> meters;
  
  for (size_t i = 0; i < ports.size(); i++)
  {
    MeterGather *m = new MeterGather(ports[i]);
    meters.push_back(m);
  }
  
  bool initialized = true;
  for (size_t i = 0; i < meters.size(); i++)
  {
    if ( !meters[i]->Init() ) initialized = false;
  }
  
  if (initialized)
  {
    SYSTEMTIME lt;
    GetLocalTime(&lt);
    char filename[64];
    sprintf(filename, "DMM%4.4d%2.2d%2.2d_%2.2d%2.2d%2.2d.csv",
                       lt.wYear, lt.wMonth, lt.wDay, lt.wHour, lt.wMinute, lt.wSecond);
    cout << "Log file is " << filename << endl;
    ofstream logfile(filename);
    if (logfile.fail())
    {
      cerr << "Error opening log file" << endl;
      return 1;
    }

    for (size_t i = 0; i < meters.size(); i++)
    {
      meters[i]->Start();
    }
  
    // infinite timed loop
    HANDLE hTimer = CreateWaitableTimer(0, FALSE, 0);
    LARGE_INTEGER cycle_time;
    LONG period = interval * 1000; // ms
    cycle_time.QuadPart = period * -10000LL; // 100ns
    SetWaitableTimer(hTimer, &cycle_time, period, 0, 0, 0);
    SetConsoleCtrlHandler(ctrlcHandler, TRUE);
    HANDLE handles[] = {hExit, hTimer};
    
    char localtime[80];
    GetTimeFormat(LOCALE_USER_DEFAULT, 0, NULL, NULL, (LPSTR)localtime, 79);
    cout << "Logging begins at " << localtime << endl;
    int count;
    double meanval, minval, maxval;
    char *time;
    for (;;)
    {
      DWORD status = WaitForMultipleObjects(2, handles, FALSE, INFINITE);
      if (status == WAIT_OBJECT_0)
      {
        break;
      }
      stringstream ss;
      time = timeString();
      ss << time;
      for (size_t i = 0; i < meters.size(); i++)
      {
        meters[i]->GetReadings(count, meanval, minval, maxval);
        ss << ", " << count << ", " << meanval << ", " << minval << ", " << maxval;
      }
      cout << ss.str() << endl;
      logfile << ss.str() << endl;
    }

    cout << "Logging concluded." << endl;
    logfile.close();
  }
  
  for (size_t i = 0; i < meters.size(); i++)
  {
    delete meters[i];
  }
  
  return 0;
}

main.cpp

Code:
// Copyright (C) 2010 Mr Happy, CandlePowerForums. All rights reserved.
//
// RadioShack 22-812 Meter logging program

#define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
#include <cstring>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

int LogData(int interval, vector<string> &ports);

int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
  int status = 0;
  vector<string> ports;

  if (argc < 3) goto usage;
  
  int interval = atoi(argv[1]);
  if (interval <= 0) goto usage;
  
  for (int i = 2; i < argc; i++)
  {
    ports.push_back(argv[i]);
  }

  status = LogData(interval, ports);
  
  return status;
  
usage:
  cout << "usage: RSDMM <interval> <port1> [<port2> ...]" << endl;
  return 1;
}
 
Last edited:
Couldn't justify the price of an RS232 or USB capable multimeter (more $$$ == less flashlights :)) so I just ordered a cheapo [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Sear's Digital Mini Multimeter with autorange that works of AAAs.

Now I'm playing with the idea of simply reading the LCD display into the computer via webcam. Looks pretty easy given the limited display capabilities of multimeters and I guess its safer as well as there is no physical connection to the PC.

Anyone else tried this approach with multimeters? :thinking:

-PG
[/FONT]
 
Sounds like hard work to me as you now have to do image recognition, but it's a creative solution and kudos to you if you can make it work.

Although it might seem the RS meter is tethered to a computer, the RS232 output is optically isolated so it is not as connected as it seems.
 
Sounds like hard work to me as you now have to do image recognition...

Been a while since I wrote any Windows software (more of a Linux guy :)) but after a little research it doesn't look super impossible, especially after google turned up the awesome OpenCV: http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary/ :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

My multimeter still hasn't arrived yet, but my cheapo lightmeter was waiting when I got back from work. A quick install of freeware Dev C++ and 90mins later we have...



Yes, so not quite the full thing yet but webcam is streaming fine, hacked up a bit of code to mark the LCD surface and project the pixels to a flat 2D window - now I need to identify the digits and output them to a file :)

... but out of time for tonight :eek: - maybe have a bit more of a hack on Sunday :thinking:

-PG
 
Mr Happy,

I too have a Radioshack 22-812 that I've used for data logging. I previously used QtDMM on Ubuntu 8.10, but one day it mysteriously stopped working and I couldn't get it to work.

I wanted something exactly like the program you made, simple and effective. I downloaded the Visual Studio Express C++ and it compiled nicely. One thing to note, it needed to be compiled on the machine it will be run on. I compiled it on my laptop running Windows 7 32 bit and the executable wouldn't run on an older desktop running Windows XP 32 bit.

I've used your program for doing a few runtime tests using a homemade light box, if anyone is interested I can share a few photos and details.

Thanks again for the software.

Kris
 
I wanted something exactly like the program you made, simple and effective. I downloaded the Visual Studio Express C++ and it compiled nicely. One thing to note, it needed to be compiled on the machine it will be run on. I compiled it on my laptop running Windows 7 32 bit and the executable wouldn't run on an older desktop running Windows XP 32 bit.
Thanks for the feedback, I'm glad the code was useful.

You should be able to overcome the portability problem by going into the project properties and changing the Runtime Library in C/C++ Code Generation from Multi-threaded DLL (/MD) to Multi-threaded (/MT). This will create a slightly bigger executable but it should then run on other computers without needing to be rebuilt. Alternatively you could copy the required run-time DLLs along with the executable (keep them all in the same directory), or you could experiment with creating a setup project for the program...
 
Mr. Happy,

I'm reviving this old thread since thanks to you, I've found what is likely the most economical data logging DMM. The only thing is the readout is off by more than .5V as compared to my Fluke 289. Do you know if there is a way this meter can be calibrated?

I just used it to graph the V portion of the V60C charging base review. It's my first go at it so I'd appreciate if anyone can point out any mistakes I made (kudos to HKJ for his awesome write up re: his charger testing methodology).

Cheers,
Tim
 
The only thing is the readout is off by more than .5V as compared to my Fluke 289. Do you know if there is a way this meter can be calibrated?

DMM are usual not that wrong. The first thing to do is check the battery in the RadioShack meter.
When comparing voltage readout, did you wire the meters in parallel to secure exactly same voltage to them?

In your charging setup you might easily have a 0.2 volt difference between charger base and battery, due to the wires and ammeter.
 
Thx HKJ, I goofed and shifted the decimal spot over. I meant to say there was up to a .05V difference. It seems it depends on the V range as below 4V, it is nearly spot on w/the Fluke. Measuring a sinlge LiIon cell, it's about .02-.03 off and w/2 cells around .04 and w/3 cells there can be greater than .05 difference. I suppose it's negligible and for the price I paid, I can't really complain.

These readings were unloaded (meaning not connected to the charger) so should be an apples:apples comparo.

As for the wiring set up during monitoring, it's as follows:

So basically:
- Positive lead from Fluke 289 & RS 22-812 are connected to anode of charger
- Negative lead from 289 connected to jumper on anode of battery carrier
- Negative lead from 22-812 and cathode from battery carrier are connected to jumper of cathode of V60C charging base

So it's not exactly parallel. Does that look right? I could've saved one connection/wire between the meters but I don't have a stacking patch cord yet (coming next week).

Thx!,
Tim
 
Top