was.lost.but.now.found
Enlightened
I made the switch from the 15 minute Energizer charger to the BC-900. I wanted something that would be a little softer on my batteries. I seem to understand there are two prevailing theories - (1) charge as low a rate as possible - (2) but not so low that the cutoff cannot be detected. I've also heard that the BC-900 may not be the best for determining this at the slowest charging rate (200 mA). Is this correct so far?
As soon as I got the charger Tuesday night I went right to running a "Test" cycle on the supplied free batteries. Immediately I could tell that two of the four AAs were junk as they discharged at a much higher rate and finished at an accumulated capacity of 1251 mAh, and 1420 mAh (out of stated 2600 mAh). The other two are still going so they should be much stronger using a rough estimate of the total time for charge/discharge/charge of the bad two compared to the other two.
I did run this test at the default 200 mA charge; I watched closely every few minutes toward the end of the charge to ensure they would terminate and not endlessly charge. The final voltage when they switched to "Full" was 1.45 volts, and after a short rest into the trickle charge they went to 1.44. I was wondering if this sounds correct or if it is too "hot" and I should up the charge rate to 500 mA so the charger can better detect what I believe is called delta-v?
As another note, my next test will be to run a full refresh cycle and see if the capacity improves. I would prefer to use the lowest charge rate which will be the most gentle on the batteries, but not if it's going to damage them. Am I worrying too much? Is there not much difference between 200 and 500 charge rates?
Thanks in advance for your answers!
As soon as I got the charger Tuesday night I went right to running a "Test" cycle on the supplied free batteries. Immediately I could tell that two of the four AAs were junk as they discharged at a much higher rate and finished at an accumulated capacity of 1251 mAh, and 1420 mAh (out of stated 2600 mAh). The other two are still going so they should be much stronger using a rough estimate of the total time for charge/discharge/charge of the bad two compared to the other two.
I did run this test at the default 200 mA charge; I watched closely every few minutes toward the end of the charge to ensure they would terminate and not endlessly charge. The final voltage when they switched to "Full" was 1.45 volts, and after a short rest into the trickle charge they went to 1.44. I was wondering if this sounds correct or if it is too "hot" and I should up the charge rate to 500 mA so the charger can better detect what I believe is called delta-v?
As another note, my next test will be to run a full refresh cycle and see if the capacity improves. I would prefer to use the lowest charge rate which will be the most gentle on the batteries, but not if it's going to damage them. Am I worrying too much? Is there not much difference between 200 and 500 charge rates?
Thanks in advance for your answers!