Quick Beamshot Comparison between Lumapower M3 Turbohead & T3/MMagled 3AA/D-mini

woodrow

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
2,027
Location
New Mexico
I just got the Lumapower M3 with the "turboforce head" w/ smooth reflector from Batteryjunction. It was only after I saw some beamshots and pictures of the turboforce head, (thanks everyone) that I became interested in the light.

I love the beam of my D-mini, but with only 30 minutes of runtime with a AW cell, it has limited hiking potential. I wanted the same beam, but with hours of runtime. With 2 lithium AA's, The M3 should provide that.

The light is not as bright as the D-mini
frown.gif
That has been its #1 complaint that I have read here. But I knew that when I ordered it. It is WAY brighter than the MMagLed and even slightly brighter (+/- 10%) than my 2007 Inova T3 with its 5+ watt K2 led running on 3 CR123A's.

Here are some quick beamshots I took. The camera was 15' from the wall, and the lights were 8 ' from the wall and 5' to the right. That should explain why the sidespill might look a little oval. I just did not want any lightbounce back to the lens, so I tried this. I was using a 50mm lens at f/2.0 . Shutter was set to 1 second. (Iso 400)

Here is a shot with the room lit:
494184433_af233ee43c.jpg


First the D-mini w/ AW 3.7v rcr123a:
494116645_8b00a3b050.jpg


The LP M3 on 2x e2 lithium AA's with Turboforce head and smooth reflector
on High:
494116635_9bdebfa521.jpg


494116633_4a429d4baf.jpg


494116629_3d5afb701b.jpg


Her is a close up picture of about 3' with the M3 and T3 next to each other. The M3 has a brigher sidespill than the T3. The spot is brighter, but should be with the smooth reflector.

494116619_9fcbae1ea2.jpg


So I think the M3 with the turbo head is a great light. I like a much more with the turbohead than without. Having the bigger reflector does a much better job of focusing the beam. So those of you who love your D-mini, but need a little longer runtime, this light is not a bad choice. + you have all the other configurations and 2 lower levels to choose if you need 20----??? hours of runtime.

Thanks for taking the time to look at the pictures
smile.gif
 
Re: Quick Beamshot Comparison between Lumapower M3 Turbohead & T3/MMagled 3AA/D-mini

I just wanted to thank ernsanada by name for the great pictures of the M3 w/ turbohead. Also, sorry for the not so great beamshot picture quality. I used target for the cd (no digital slr yet) and it looks to me if they turned the pics black and white. Oh well, thats what you get when you are in a hurry.

My estimite of lumans would be... D-mini 115 , M3 75-80, T3 65, MMag 3AA 40

Just a guess, but I state them to show the difference in light output between lights to my eyes.
 
Re: Quick Beamshot Comparison between Lumapower M3 Turbohead & T3/MMagled 3AA/D-mini

Very nice pics, thanks.

smile.gif
 
Re: Quick Beamshot Comparison between Lumapower M3 Turbohead & T3/MMagled 3AA/D-mini

Here is a picture of the D-mini and M3's beamshots side by side. Don't know why they would not come up on the other computer.
494521561_12573aafde.jpg
 
Top