Oops... I didn't notice that. I was checking my ear buds order at DX and inevitably, browsed to 'AA Cree Flashlights' category, and found this flashlight. Somehow, I knew it should be a new flashlight and was hoping that someone here might has it... what was I thinkingIt showed up today, I'm sure HK Post isn't so fast.
I wouldn't take the manufacturers lumen claims too seriously.BTW, how do I compare the Budget Light sticky thread's RC-I3 & RC-N3 lux rating to the RC-X5's "87~150 lumens maximum brightness (manufacturer rated)"?
★★★★★ Romisen RC-I3 CR123A/1AA/2AA/14500 LINK (Reviewed MAY 1st 2008)
Throw: 400 lux (1AA NiMh) 900 lux (2AA NiMh) 1400 lux (1 x RCR123A / 14500)
Lightbox: 25 lux (1AA NiMh) 60 lux (2AA NiMh) 100 lux (1 x RCR123A / 14500)
★★★★★★ Romisen RC-N3 CR123A/2AA LINK (Reviewed Mar 27th 2008)
Throw: 1100 lux (2 x AA NiMh @ 2.8v) 1900 lux (1 x RCR123A @ 4.2v)
Lightbox: 50 lux (2 x AA NiMh @ 2.8v) 100 lux (1 x RCR123A @ 4.2v)
That would be for a RCR123a cell presumably. It is perhaps still a bit optimistic to be honest. 2xAA or cr123a would be considerably less.Ísnt the RC-N3 was rated 130 lumen according to Romisen Korean website ? But is it from R123 , not the AA I guess
http://www.romisen.co.kr/FrontStore...ryIdMain=0&iGoodsId=0003_00005&iCurrentPage=1
How come the RC-N3 looks so much brighter? They both use a Cree P4 emitter. The RC-X5 wall pics look almost like depleted AA alkalines.... dim and yellow :sick2:
Different camera exposures can make Cree brighter than HID. X5 is probably noticeably brighter than N3.