...sorry for the long winded post -

.
Man, are you kidding?! I absolutely loved your detailed post!! You're speaking my language and yes, it unbelievable to me that a TK75 is blown away by something like a D4SvnV2. It wouldn't have seemed real or possible to me if I could have traveled forward in time.
I think it's great that you enjoy similar outings and overnight trips and it goes so perfectly with this fun hobby. One of my regular hiking buddies commented on how much more fun the night hiking is when you have really capable lighting equipment. It just expands the night world so much. He's not nearly the flashlight maniac I am but it was great to hear his appreciation of it. Now he's always asking about night hiking because from the aspect of wildlife, we typically see more on night hikes that day hikes, which is really cool.
I definitely understand the lure of wanting to be able to use the same cell in more than one light but at the same time it probably restricts choices. On shorter hikes, perhaps 2-4 hours and then finishing back at the car, I've been ignoring the cell type and taking whichever lights pair well with regards to beam types, and which are also easy to handle/manage from an ergonomic standpoint. Even when hiking by myself, if I'm carrying 4-5 flashlights there's so much light redundancy that I really don't have any concerns about something failing. If something runs out of power or starts flashing, I just pack it away. In the case of overnight or hikes that require a good deal of canyon scrambling, I'll try harder to keep several lights using the same cell. An example might be, H30, E07vn, T27vn, then HM65R, D4vn(HI CRI).
The K30GTvn is one of those lights that's great on shorter hikes but I probably won't take it on anything much longer than a few hours. The same goes for the D4Svn. Those two lights combined come in at 711grams! If I switch that combo over to a E07vn and T27vn the combined weight is 430grams and I don't really feel like a missing much performance. The heavier lights are a luxury for when carrying an extra pound or two isn't a burden. The lighter lights are a practical consideration in order to reduce the amount of fatigue, while also carrying enough water and energy boosting trail snacks, clothing, emergency gear, rope when needed, etc.
I don't think I'd call it a self imposed rule, but when picking a belt or pack light to compliment the one that I'll be hand carrying, I like to go with something that gives me at least 4x the throw of my hand held light. So in the case of a D4SvnW2, I think the K30GTvn approaches that number fairly closely. For something like a 40Kcd E07, something over 160Kcd works well for helping me see something that I'm struggling to see with the smaller light.
Only you can decide if a CATvnV690 would compliment your D4SvnV2 enough but with the EmisarVN having so much performance already (118Kcd) I'm going to be looking for something with at least 300Kcd in order to justify carrying it. If there's not a healthy boost of performance between the primary and secondary, at some point I have to ask myself if it just wouldn't make more sense to carry an extra cell or two for the primary.
Compared to the CATv6 the T27vn90 is a few grams lighter and does 4300L 460Kcd. I suppose if a CATvnV690 could push 300Kcd it might change my mind however, because of it's compact dimensions. I'm eager to see what that little Thrunite can do though. Hopefully Vinh put a SBT90 in one soon!
The White 2.1 would definitely throw further than XHP35HI in the Catapult but I don't think it would be a good trade. You'd be cutting more than 1/2 your lumen output in order to gain 20-30% throw.