gcbryan
Flashlight Enthusiast
OK, I have a two questions that I'm not quite sure of.
The XP-G has an output angle of 125 degrees and the XR-E has a angle of 90 degrees. Which will produce the narrowest angle using a reflector?
1.) Is it the XR-E because it has the narrowest angle or is it the XP-G because it has the widest angle and therefore wouldn't more light make it onto the face of the reflector and produce a narrower beam?
2.) Regarding a quad package (MC-E). Is the light output the same whether wired either 2S2P and driven at 7.2V and 1400mA or 4P and driven at 3.6V and 2800mA or 4S and driven at 14.4V and 700mA?
I've never been quite clear or certain about those two points.
By the way, wouldn't 3 XP-G R5 bin * (2) 18650 be the ultimate hand held light? Burn time could still be close to 2 hours especially with a 50% setting to go to as needed to make that time. This would be 1041 lumens (not OTF of course). Even if you kept it at 50% much of the time look at how efficient it would be and you would still have 500 lumens.
The XP-G has an output angle of 125 degrees and the XR-E has a angle of 90 degrees. Which will produce the narrowest angle using a reflector?
1.) Is it the XR-E because it has the narrowest angle or is it the XP-G because it has the widest angle and therefore wouldn't more light make it onto the face of the reflector and produce a narrower beam?
2.) Regarding a quad package (MC-E). Is the light output the same whether wired either 2S2P and driven at 7.2V and 1400mA or 4P and driven at 3.6V and 2800mA or 4S and driven at 14.4V and 700mA?
I've never been quite clear or certain about those two points.
By the way, wouldn't 3 XP-G R5 bin * (2) 18650 be the ultimate hand held light? Burn time could still be close to 2 hours especially with a 50% setting to go to as needed to make that time. This would be 1041 lumens (not OTF of course). Even if you kept it at 50% much of the time look at how efficient it would be and you would still have 500 lumens.