Stenlight S7: SSC P4 LED upgrade

wasBlinded

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,222
Location
Oklahoma
With my Seoul Semiconductor P4 USWOH bin emitters in hand, I decided to upgrade my Stenlight. I had previously installed the recently available reflectors from JSB, and later upgraded the stock Luxeons with UVOJ emitters, for an increase in peak Lux readings of from 1400 to 1800 in Turbo mode.

Getting to the emitters in the Stenlight is not difficult. They are easy to remove. Underneath each emitter, and isolating the slug from the circuit board/heat sink is a sticky thermal pad. I elected to remove the pads, and lay down a very thin layer of Arctic ceramic epoxy instead. On top of the cured epoxy, I put a small dollop of Arctic Ceramique thermal compound. I don't know if this is better than the pad or not, it simply seemed like it might be.

Positioning the new emitters was not easy, and I spent quite a bit of time nudging them about to center them in the reflectors. It was not really worth the effort from the performance standpoint, because slightly off-center emitters did not reduce peak lux values or influence beam pattern to a noticeable degree.

After all was said and done, the peak Lux reading was actually a bit lower than with the UVOJ Luxeons, (1600 Lux vs. 1800 Lux). The hotspot is quite a bit larger than with the Luxeons, so this is where the extra light generated by the SSC P4 LEDs is going. For caving, I like a larger hotspot (if I need big throw in a big room, I'll pull a Mag74 out of my pack). These P4s have a nice tint to them, and there is no color fringing in this application.

Edit: I was erroneously measuring Lux at 43.5 inches instead of 39.4 inches (1 meter). Measuring peak Lux now, I get 2150 with the P4 LEDs in Turbo before it drops down to around 1700 over 2 minutes or so.
 
Last edited:
geee.... i'm looking up to you right now! :D

Very nice lights.... So it doesn't sound like you needed to change the reflectors from JSB at all when using your new SSC P4's? If thats the case thats interesting.... do they seem to be in good focus?

Thanks for sharing!

- Jared :)
 
I don't know if the P4s are in perfect focus or not. I suspect they aren't, and that is why the hotspot is quite a bit larger. At least there is no donut with unmodified reflectors.
 
cy said:
any pic's?

Hi Cy -

No pics. I don't have any white walls!

On another note, do you have a luxmeter? And is your Stenlight unmodified? If so, I wonder if you would do a quick Lux test on yours. Absolute numbers aren't important, I would like to know what your lux readings do in the first minute or two on Turbo. On mine, I get about a 25% drop in the first two minutes or so from when first switched on. On High, that doesn't happen. I'm wondering if that is inherent to the Stenlight, since the thermal path to the body doesn't really look that good, or if it is a result of something I did. I never did look at this when my Stenlight was unmodified.
 
don't want no beamshot.

pic's of board with emitter removed would have been nice...
 
No pics, but the board is interesting. Under the little thermal pad the emitter is resting on is tinned PCB with a bunch of little vias through the board. These vias (holes) are used to transmit the heat to the back side of the PCB, which is probably thermal epoxied to the case. This isn't a great thermal path, but on High or lower it seems adequate.
 
Last edited:
The vias are actually quite a good thermal path. Not as good as a solid slug, but the heat is also spread throughout the circuit board.

The sticky tape is rather special stuff and is a very good thermal conductor. It needs to be applied/reapplied with a fair amount of pressure for a minute or so. If you need more stickytape let me know and I'll send you some.
 
Top