An interesting and thought provoking thread. I have always been a fan of a low low level, one of the reasons I continue to be a fan of the Arc4/HDS/Novatac/Ra heritage lights, and one reason I thought the original Liteflux twisty models (LF2/3/4/5) were underrated as EDC candidates. And I admit that I generally prefer for EDC and utility purposes a beam that leans more toward flood than to throw (again, one benefit of the Novatac and Liteflux lights - particularly the SS4 versions).
But this post really takes it to another level. The only pure flood light I've experienced is the CR2 Ion and if you've grown accustomed to more conventional beam profiles, even relatively floodier ones, it takes some getting used to ... I continue to waiver just a bit with the Ion as the pure flood beams, while useful, were to me at least a bit too mission specific. What this post has challenged, in terms of my own perceptions, is that perhaps they aren't as mission specific as I'd originally thought.
I've been pondering a bit the ideal light setup - I do think that with the flexibility we have with LEDs that we could all get by with fewer lights than we do and really meet all our needs (heck I lived for years with 3 lights, a Photon II on my key ring, an HDS B42XRGT and a Streamlight Strion - those three really did meet close to 100% of my needs). The decision matrix is dense, however, with variables. Size, beam profile, battery choice and flexibility, UI, reliability, redundancy, and a lot of others not the least of which is cost.
I have to admit the high CRI emitters didn't do much for me or didn't capture my imagination, but seeing some of these beam shots makes me really wonder if it is possible to mod a CR2 Ion with one of these emitters! That could make a real killer light and a viable "Sundrop Lite" for those of us who admire Don's lights but find them a bit out of our price range... :thinking: