curious to see how this will compare to the soon-to-be-released LF2XT (AAA).
As am I. Although I must add that I'm not buying any more lights that aren't neutral tint. So if they'd release a Q3 LF3XT I'd have bought in long ago.
Help Support Candle Power Flashlight Forum
curious to see how this will compare to the soon-to-be-released LF2XT (AAA).
Thank you for your thoughts and experiences with the EZ, Andrew.The very great difference in the two output levels concerns me, and I don't yet know exactly how I will use this light.
...about 85% of a full 360 degree rotation to get from onset of low to high, -- A fast, easy way to change levels is a necessary feature for any multi-level light, IMO, so I was not a happy camper.
Thank you for your thoughts and experiences with the EZ, Andrew.
The two quotes above are the main reasons why I think I'm gonna take a pass on this one. These have been my thoughts all along so don't go thinking you talked me out of it. :ironic: :wave:
I received my EZAA today---thanks very much to 4sevens & crew for the very fast ship. 2 days from Atlanta to the outskirts of Austin, Texas---not too shabby.
Well, I said my early experience with the EZAA had been unusual, and I didn't mean just as to the USB AA cell. I soon discovered that mine, unlike some of the other revised models already received, required about 85% of a full 360 degree rotation to get from onset of low to high, as had been reported for the original version A fast, easy way to change levels is a necessary feature for any multi-level light, IMO, so I was not a happy camper.
.
As for output, high is very strong---on an eneloop it is maybe a hair less than my EX10 on max (on an RCR123A cell). Low is probably right around what Nitecore said it is in the revised version---10 lumens---judging by the fact that its overall output, based on a quick ceiling bounce test, is close to my EO1, which is rated at 10 lumens as Benson points out above. The very great difference in the two output levels concerns me, and I don't yet know exactly how I will use this light.
I did a quick informal runtime test, and got about 45 minutes on high on an eneloop. This was a bit less than the 50 minutes given by Nitecore, although I don't believe they said what kind of cell was used to arrive at that number. However, output appeared to be quite flat during that entire time.
As an EDC light it would be nice if the high was a real 60 lumens for longer runtime as a work light. I wish they would forgo the "wow" high lumens for the one cell AA or AAA lights. :naughty: Would be nice to be able to use it for 2-3 hours on a decent high setting, and being so small it could be carried on a neck lanyard for instant always ready to use for whatever. Maybe we will be able to access the driver for some mods. 😗
Bill
Well, mechanically, there's a conical spring that makes initial contact (low) and is collapsed down flat to contact the center of the PCB (high); the exact set of the spring and any variations in soldering it are critical, and there's less than one turn in all cases reported, which is IMHO quite close lengthwise. Of course, I'd have liked a coarser and/or multi-lead thread, which could have reduced this, but given the thread choice, I can't see controlling the spring gap much tighter than this.Why is there, as reported in this thread, so much variation in rotation of these lights when switching from low to high?
...much-clipped... I am happy with my "twist fix", and the EZ is definitely easier to use with a shorter turn to access the levels. The only thing that concerns me is that while I, an admittedly unhandy guy, could so significantly improve the UI in about 30 minutes of trying, I would've preferred that the experts at NiteCore pay a bit more attention to this issue, particularly in light of the wide variations that appear to exist in the finished product. I'm not bashing NiteCore here, and in fact, I am a big fan of their innovation and their products. Just wondering. :thinking:
Well... the real problem is if you attempt to build up the pad without removing the spring, and your iron is too fat or jitters too much (I think both were factors with me) you'll wind up soldering the spring to the center pad. This will eliminate the low mode, and is a royal pain to recover from -- took me about a half hour.Benson, thanks for that insight on the spring/twist issue. If a clumsy solderer, like me, attempted this, and bled solder between the center (high) contact point and the perimeter (low) contact points, would that result in losing the low level? At any rate, that was my concern, and so, not being skilled with a soldering iron, or even owning a needle tip iron, I went at it a bit differently.
being so small it could be carried on a neck lanyard for instant always ready to use for whatever.Bill
I'm curious to know how close in size this light comes to the LD01, which is a phenomenal light, especially on a 10440.