PhotonWrangler
Flashaholic
I have no sense of how large a usable battery will need to be but I thought it was an interesting read. Can anyone confirm or debunk this?
Thunderf00t is indeed fun when he's ragging on things.Here is a debunking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDFlV0OEK5E
I think they could be useful in other ways depending on the performance of them. If the battery type has a lot batter performance than current batteries and the cost can be amortized over a few decades instead of eons the fact they never have to be replaced could be a huge advantage as replacing batteries costs money in labor and shipping and downtime when batteries fail or perform poorly. Imagine using these batteries in backup power supplies for cell towers and internet providers. Imagine buying a UPS for 3 times the price in your 20s and having it when you are 65 still working. Imagine having a large bank of these cells in a house instead of a power generator and being able to pay a fee to swap them out when there is a power outage for fresh ones. Imagine electric vehicles that you never have to worry about batteries, manufacturers that make interchangeable electric vehicle batteries you buy once and that is all. Tool batteries that never need replacing, a lot of batteries that go into landfills would vanish from use.Even if constructing such a battery is possible, I see no application for it outside of aerospace industry. Why would you need a battery lasting thousands of years in a consumer device that only lasts couple of years? The presence of radioactive isotopes is another obstacle.