F89
Flashlight Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2014
- Messages
- 1,113
How important are the amount of lumens to you? As I mentioned before, my always with me light is an AA 119V Haiku which likely "only" puts out around 60 lumens (out the front) on high? I find this more than adequate for the majority of the time.
The efficiency bin of the 119V is B10 from memory and is rated for about 250 lumens at 1A. What comes out the front is likely much less. Don actually lists what he measured in various posts somewhere.
While I have various lights, some of which are high powered, I often find that the distribution and quality of light is as, or more important than the intensity. Of course, that all depends.
Tint wise I find the 119V to be very pleasing, and the CRI is also very good. I think it's still very competitive and even better than many current alternatives.
In my experience the output between the, also discontinued, sw45k (D220 efficiency bin) and 119V to be moderate at best despite the higher rating on paper. The sw45k has superior colour rendering, but it's also a bit cooler and pink to the eye. Another point regarding the two is that the sw45k (219B) is more fussy about reflectors, and can create a fried egg or monster eye effect if the reflector doesn't smooth it out right (the XR reflector does a beautiful job, the old XP with heavier texture also works, while the current XP reflector creates the unwanted effect).
The 119V, while not the most powerful or efficient, are an excellent LED and more than make up for it by quality of light. A definite favourite of mine.
I can also recommend Don's XPG2, it has a nice tint and reasonable CRI but a higher output (noticeable) than the 119V.
While I haven't tried it behind the XR reflector, I believe it would behave similarly to the 119V by providing a more gradual distribution of light- more floody.
The XPL HI (4200K version) may also be of interest?
In summary, regarding Don's options, the 119V is the least efficient but highest CRI and arguably best tint.
The efficiency bin of the 119V is B10 from memory and is rated for about 250 lumens at 1A. What comes out the front is likely much less. Don actually lists what he measured in various posts somewhere.
While I have various lights, some of which are high powered, I often find that the distribution and quality of light is as, or more important than the intensity. Of course, that all depends.
Tint wise I find the 119V to be very pleasing, and the CRI is also very good. I think it's still very competitive and even better than many current alternatives.
In my experience the output between the, also discontinued, sw45k (D220 efficiency bin) and 119V to be moderate at best despite the higher rating on paper. The sw45k has superior colour rendering, but it's also a bit cooler and pink to the eye. Another point regarding the two is that the sw45k (219B) is more fussy about reflectors, and can create a fried egg or monster eye effect if the reflector doesn't smooth it out right (the XR reflector does a beautiful job, the old XP with heavier texture also works, while the current XP reflector creates the unwanted effect).
The 119V, while not the most powerful or efficient, are an excellent LED and more than make up for it by quality of light. A definite favourite of mine.
I can also recommend Don's XPG2, it has a nice tint and reasonable CRI but a higher output (noticeable) than the 119V.
While I haven't tried it behind the XR reflector, I believe it would behave similarly to the 119V by providing a more gradual distribution of light- more floody.
The XPL HI (4200K version) may also be of interest?
In summary, regarding Don's options, the 119V is the least efficient but highest CRI and arguably best tint.
Last edited: