Things that don't make sense

[Illum]

If its from fish then say its from fish

Hey, Hotel designers, low-flows are designed to reduce water use...okay, that I agree, but then walking beyond the suite introduction card and into the bathroom and I see this

If your trying to conserve water then whats this about?:thinking:

 

[PhotonWrangler]

Hey, Hotel designers, low-flows are designed to reduce water use...okay, that I agree, but then walking beyond the suite introduction card and into the bathroom and I see this

If your trying to conserve water then whats this about?:thinking:

I'm guessing it's for two people showering together.

 

[Kestrel]

< insert budget LED 'showerhead' joke here >

 

[Monocrom]

I'm guessing it's for two people showering together.

No wait! I get it. . .

One head for your head, the other for your body. In theory, two heads means you'll be done with your shower in half the time since your head and body are both being thoroughly washed at the same time. Yup, that's it.

(I dare anyone to come up with a better explanation.) :nana:

 

[Illum]

No wait! I get it. . .

One head for your head, the other for your body. In theory, two heads means you'll be done with your shower in half the time since your head and body are both being thoroughly washed at the same time. Yup, that's it.

(I dare anyone to come up with a better explanation.) :nana:

there are showerheads made for that...ones vertical and the other is mounted horizontally on the wall😗

 

[Monocrom]

there are showerheads made for that...ones vertical and the other is mounted horizontally on the wall😗

Maybe the double-headed model is the cheapo version preferred by hotels. :shrug:

 

[Lite_me]

I'll see your two and raise you one.

 

[John_Galt]

I'm sure their are building codes that require low-flow shower heads. Using two in such a manner allows them to still be technically within code, but they get fewer complaints from people about crappy flow and pressure issues.

 

[Monocrom]

I'm sure their are building codes that require low-flow shower heads. Using two in such a manner allows them to still be technically within code, but they get fewer complaints from people about crappy flow and pressure issues.

Darn it! That does sound like a better explanation than what I came up with.

 

[red02]

I'm sure their are building codes that require low-flow shower heads. Using two in such a manner allows them to still be technically within code, but they get fewer complaints from people about crappy flow and pressure issues.

My physics is pretty rusty, but doesn't increasing the area over which the water is forced through lower the pressure making it more likely that people will complain? I think its Pascal's principle, right?

 

[Databyter]

OK, heres a scenario for you hard core aalways have a light on my person guys.

The economy is down and there is an increase of crime.

You happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and circumstantial evidence put you into a harsh prison environment.

What do you bring with you stored in your posterior.

Nothing?

Your favorite AAA Titanium EDC?

A Penknife in a stainless shell

A roll of cash in stainless steel

Some other light.

How important is that light now, if you're locked up and have no control over your environment, more or less.

Just a random thought provoking idea.

So many angles to consider, the freedom of having a light after it gets dark for the rest of the inmate population.

Some prisons might allow small lights, I really don't know. I'm pretty sure they would allow batteries or a charger.

I'm just wondering if some of the hardcore EDC'ers in here would like to defend the idea in that environment, or is this finally a place, like the shower for some, where it just stops making sense.

I personally carry a titanium lithium AAA light with me (not in my rear though), and usually a cr123 based light on my belt if I'm going out even in the early afternoon and know I'll be gone for a long time.

The question is, how hard core is either your addiction, worship, or commen sense feeling that a light is critical everywhere?

 

[Databyter]

My physics is pretty rusty, but doesn't increasing the area over which the water is forced through lower the pressure making it more likely that people will complain? I think its Pascal's principle, right?

This wouldn't apply with low flows since they are already a small fraction of the available pressure.

 

[Alaric Darconville]

Anyway after further investigation I found that there was a light switch on the panel (yes, it was on). What I can't figure out is this: Why in the world would anyone want to turn off the lights in an elevator car?

It just dawned on me that it's recommended one turns off the switch before changing a bulb.

 

[PhotonWrangler]

It just dawned on me that it's recommended one turns off the switch before changing a bulb.

Ok, that makes some sense. But only if they put the light switch somewhere near the bulb. I don't want to be in an elevator with some creepy person who decides to turn the light off after the door closes.

 

[Brigadier]

I normally do, but I've temporarily misplaced (I hope) my Fenix P3D-CE. It figures that the day that I didn't have it would be the day that I really needed it. :ironic:

Two is one, one is none, Grasshopper.

 

[red02]

It just dawned on me that it's recommended one turns off the switch before changing a bulb.

I've heard that you should turn the power on as your screwing in the bulb so you know when the bulb makes good contact and you don't over tighten. Been doing that for a few years now without incident.

 

[Monocrom]

OK, heres a scenario for you hard core always have a light on my person guys.

Your post doesn't make sense to me.:thinking:

 

[LukeA]

Your post doesn't make sense to me.:thinking:

:drunk:

(him, not you!)

 

[TorchBoy]

LOL.

I feel honored. I think I'm the first CPFer to have the new smilie used at him. Thanks.

BTW, on a slightly more serious note, you don't know my background regarding children with learning disabilities. It's not something I've ever shared before with the CPF community, and not something I plan to. However, I will say that my previous post was not based on assumptions drawn out of thin air. Nor was it an insult against children who have genuine learning disabilities.

Translation: I can say any insulting and offensive thing I like about children who can't yet read and their parents because I have an excuse which I'm not going to explain.

:fail: again. Do you even realise what you said - that if a child can't read they're either mentally handicapped or have incapable parents? Picking on parents based on misunderstandings of what you assume they might not be doing is bad enough, but picking on children? Pick on someone your own size, you bully.

 

[was.lost.but.now.found]

How about you guys take it offline (CPFU Mat sounds appropriate) so we can get the thread back on topic?