Do you mean the band from Germany?that pissed them off when i tried it they almost stoped there concert
Do you mean the band from Germany?that pissed them off when i tried it they almost stoped there concert
That;s a good question. I imagine there would be a lot of Rayleigh scattering of UV wavelengths underwater so I don't know how much throw you could get from one.What would 365nm UV be good for underwater i.e. dive light?
Dave
Oh! That's not good! I don't mess around with UV lights. I think I have three out of my massive collection of hundreds (thousands?) of lights over the decades. Just recently bought a pair of Amber UV-safety lens in case I ever actually need to use one of those three lights.Ha ha ha ha ha! I just tried that. So cool! Now i'm waiting for them to change back. I'm seeing spots!
Blood trailsWhat is the purpose(s) of UV flashlights? I use my flashlight to look for bedbugs between the hotel matress and boxspring. Does a UV light help in this respect?
The problem is that they are often advertised to be the exact same thing as the genuine, high quality versions. They're being intentionally deceitful and scammy.I hear you about the lower quality tobacco used. But hard to refer to a Cuban cigar as a fake if it's actually made in Cuba. Technically, that makes it the real thing. Doubt the folks making them consider themselves con-artists. Made in Cuba by a Cuban, just with lower quality tobacco. I'm sure some of them sell it for a lower cost than the higher quality versions. Especially to tourists.... Why not? Some of those farmers are struggling to keep their families fed. It's a good source of income for them.
Several years ago I was working an outdoor festival where one of our local hospital's dermatology departments set up a booth to show people what UV damage to skin looks like. They asked me if I wanted to have my skin checked. I asked them what wavelength they were using on their UV inspection lamp and they didn't know, so I declined. I was also astonished that they didn't know what wavelength they were exposing people to. In retrospect I'm pretty sure it was UVA.Supposedly if a person's skin has Blaschko lines due to cutaneous chimerism, the lines may be visible with UV light. However, I've yet to see a single UV photograph showing the lines, nor have I read any article making that claim which specifies the UV wavelength that makes the lines visible.
I did one of those once. Similar scenario at the local hospital. But I remember they knew the nm. I didn't ask, but they told me when they saw I was very hesitant. All I knew about UV at the time was that prolonged exposure was dangerous, hence my reluctance (terms like UVA, -B and -C meant nothing to me back then), but they assured me it was safe, so I agreed. And yes, it is UVA.Several years ago I was working an outdoor festival where one of our local hospital's dermatology departments set up a booth to show people what UV damage to skin looks like. They asked me if I wanted to have my skin checked. I asked them what wavelength they were using on their UV inspection lamp and they didn't know, so I declined. I was also astonished that they didn't know what wavelength they were exposing people to. In retrospect I'm pretty sure it was UVA.
My first suspicion for a sample that glows orange would be lint from a fabric that was dyed fluorescent orange. Do you see a lot of it in the dryer lint trap?I did one of those once. Similar scenario at the local hospital. But I remember they knew the nm. I didn't ask, but they told me when they saw I was very hesitant. All I knew about UV at the time was that prolonged exposure was dangerous, hence my reluctance (terms like UVA, -B and -C meant nothing to me back then), but they assured me it was safe, so I agreed. And yes, it is UVA.
And I really threw them off, because I had just gotten from work. Worked as an interiour carpenter at the time, and had been in a building with flying wood dust all day. So my whole body lit up like a rainbow under the UV.
But I have a question. Google doesn't give me anything conclusive. I have a Sofirn SF15 (395 nm) and SF16 (365 nm), and yellow UV-safety glasses for both protection and extra effect with the SF15 (clear ones for the SF16).
I mostly find blue glowing things at home, which is dust from what I can tell. Green / lime glowing things fortunately not so much, and that is the one thing we don't want to see (bacteria - very common to find under UV in a bathroom...).
But what is glowing bright orange under 365 nm UV?
Best I can find is it being some sort of mineral or mineral based, but whenever I find something glowing orange, it is always shaped the same as small strain of hair or dust. It's never the small, round speck or flake I would expect minteral dust to be shaped like.
We don't have a dryer, but I checked the lint filter in the washing machine. But other than being thoroughly nasty in there (it will get a proper clean ASAP™), there was not a single speck of orange in there.My first suspicion for a sample that glows orange would be lint from a fabric that was dyed fluorescent orange. Do you see a lot of it in the dryer lint trap?
This is an interesting mystery. I'm looking forward to seeing the results from your macro lens.We don't have a dryer, but I checked the lint filter in the washing machine. But other than being thoroughly nasty in there (it will get a proper clean ASAP™), there was not a single speck of orange in there.
We had a go around the house, and we think we have nailed it down to an orange night gown. Though the gown itself (if it was the right piece of clothing, I am not sure) didn't emit anything under UV. Nor the quite orange microfiber cleaning cloth that I first suspected - that didn't emit anything under UV either.
I got a macro lens on the way. Should arrive on Friday this week. Perhaps it's able to get a close-up shot of what it looks like.
Whatever it is, I cannot see it as orange with just my eyes. Even with my best hCRI flashlight.
Okay, I tried my second best (best would be to spend 10 minutes just to tie everything down tight).This is an interesting mystery. I'm looking forward to seeing the results from your macro lens.
I agree, that looks like a strand of fabric to me. That could've been picked up from anywhere.Okay, I tried my second best (best would be to spend 10 minutes just to tie everything down tight).
This macro lens is so much different to use than my Sigma zoomie! Just a millimeter of movement, and it's completely out of focus. I tried like 15 times just to get something reasonably legible. I can sometimes feel the camera shift enough on my mini-tripod when I depress the trigger to know whether the shot was good even before it shows it to me. Honestly, this was one of the most difficult shots I've done. ^^
Okay, so the image is showing...the individual fibres of a cloth, in a completely dark room except for the UV.
...Even considering to take a shot like this with my Sigma 18-250 mm is WAY beyond "Fuhgettaboutit"-territory, and well into the "Hell no!"-lands. To me, who has ever shot with a zoom lens (or default, crappy 18-55 mm), it is incredible that a lens can even do this!
I at least know now it must be from a piece of cloth, though I don't know from which one. And that it is nothing to worry about.
...And why the fibre is shaped like a racing bike siluette, I have no idea.