Vibes all the way today

Must admit, now I'm wondering if a Tudor Ranger can withstand that sort of "abuse."It is Saturday... and the time in the music room is two forty-two!
![]()
When I surveyed what watch to wear yesterday, this "Ranger-style" grabbed me. I think it will be on my wrist for at least several days, except when I jump on this...
![]()
at which time I swap whatever watch I am wearing for this - just for the ride...
![]()
While mechanical watches can withstand a fair amount of abuse, I prefer to not subject them to the vibrations and jarring of bike riding - just... because why not spare them of that when a digital G-Shock is close at hand, a watch that was MADE for abuse!
May be yes, may be no. Things do go wrong, even with the most expensive watches.Must admit, now I'm wondering if a Tudor Ranger can withstand that sort of "abuse."
Glad it was a good ride! It seems like this one might provide for minimum information acquisition time with but a glance away from the trail ahead, and if so that would be a real asset. When I rode a bicycle I had only analog watches, and now that I don't, only digital; so I guess I can't test the theory;-) That said, since I'm totally conditioned to digital displays exclusively now, I couldn't test it objectively anyway. That bike photo captures the 'mood' well.at which time I swap whatever watch I am wearing for this - just for the ride...
"Should at least be able to" is a key phrase. You would think so. BUT, unless the cost of such watches is of no financial concern to the wearer... I would not want to test my own to regular mountain bike rides or rides on weathered chip seal or gravel roads.I'd never expect a fragile dress-watch costing as much as a nice house to survive a harsh bike ride at all. But a Sports watch, even a luxury one costing thousands, should at least be able to. Including a day at the range. I mean, going back to World War I, all you had was mechanical watches for the rigors of warfare. Granted most were bigger, more robust smaller diameter pocket-watches with lugs welded onto them so they could be worn on the wrist. But still, no tough quartz models. And, those watches worked reliably under horrific conditions for years.
I'll admit, I'm flirting with the idea of saving up for either a Tudor Ranger or a Tudor Black Bay 58. Realistically could be able to spring for one or the other in about a full year. Don't plan on torture testing either one, but I'd like to know if a modern-day Luxury Sports watch can at least keep up with a G-Shock.
And on another day... it's this:Glad it was a good ride! It seems like this one might provide for minimum information acquisition time with but a glance away from the trail ahead, and if so that would be a real asset. When I rode a bicycle I had only analog watches, and now that I don't, only digital; so I guess I can't test the theory;-) That said, since I'm totally conditioned to digital displays exclusively now, I couldn't test it objectively anyway. That bike photo captures the 'mood' well.
This goes hard. I had one but the alarm wasn’t loud enoughNot to mention the possibility of suddenly and involuntarily being separated from the bike while in motion. The last thing I would want is for an expensive watch to contact the ground first. Definitely G-Shocks for me.
View attachment 73539
![]()
While mechanical watches can withstand a fair amount of abuse, I prefer to not subject them to the vibrations and jarring of bike riding - just... because why not spare them of that when a digital G-Shock is close at hand, a watch that was MADE for abuse!