fisk-king
Flashlight Enthusiast
isn't that considered an oxymoron, the phrase "a good shake light" :thinking:
Care to share what brand of solar charger you are using?I have a crank light and it doesn't hold a charge. I wouldn't go with that. I do have a fold up solar AA/AAA charger.
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n220/Daytraderwon/100_8779.jpg
I put it on a friend's pack to push the GPS up a few bars. This plus LSD NiMH could keep lights with a lower low such as my Quark Mini AA or ZL headlamp going for a long time and the sub 3 lumen low is brighter than NiteStar shakelights I own. Still if yea want something that will put off a little light for longer than you will EVER need it maybe consider one of those Quarks in AA. I think the 2XAA Quark using 0.2 lumens (this is very very low mind you but so are the shakelights) will run 30 days non stop. For something cheaper and smaller look at an ITP A2 or Quark Mini both in 1XAA. These have a regulated low of 2-3 lumens for 60 hours. Also look the Nitecore D10 and Zebralight headlamp as these too have the same low modes. The standard Quarks have the higher than 0.2 lumen 2-3 lumen mode as well. You can pack lithium Energizers in your BOB and one of these lights with a good low mode and have something that will work. I have used lights with these lower modes all the time camping and in the dark dank woods these are brighter than one might expect. Just something to think about.
+1 on the FreePlay Sherpa. I've never had to use it and rely on it, but I play with it almost every night with my 3 year-old daughter, and it seems pretty solid. I got mine at Target a few years back, I think they still sell them.
Please post video in the underground xtra points if you get it on redeye.By the time I run out of batteries I would have carpal tunnel and gone insane from cranking and shaking like I have demented disco fever robot style if I were to do away with all I have amassed so far.
I would bet the majority of those here in the forum longer than 2 years have a similar supply of ammo for the battle of light vs dark in the outage limits.
I've got to agree. Years ago when they seemed the perfect solution to several problems I bought a couple. Very expensive, they were, and darned near worthless. Better than anything available before the year 1900, but that's not saying much. A couple of years back I was building long-run lights for relatives, and a newly married youngster refused his model, saying he wanted a "shake" light. On the one hand, I was chagrined he didn't want a good light, but on the other, I was delighted to find a home for one of my overpriced & dim shake lights. Last year a dollar-type store was selling squeeze lights for kids to use during Halloween. They featured a LED bulb backed up by a battery. So a few 'squeezes' and the thing would run several minutes with decent light output. I wish I'd bought more than I did. Given my luck with the durability of mechanical devices though, I'd lean towards a solar light if "reliable" was the biggest issue.None of them, really.