I'm personally quite happy using unprotected quality 18650's in my ZL light. I use an SC600 rather than an H600, but they're the same electronics.
But I look after my cells. The ZL cuts out safely at 2.7V, which is kind enough on the cells, though I never run them down that low.
I didn't see anywhere in the posts above a clarification about the "A" suffix on Panasonic's NCR18650.
None of them have an electronic protection circuit in the state they come from Panasonic, and they aren't designed to be sold on a cell by cell basis. They're supposed to be purchased by battery pack manufacturers and put into packs along with battery management circuitry.
But they do all have built-in internal protective devices: A PTC (positive temperature coefficient) physical protection device and a CID (current interrupt device) for safety. These are extremely effective and reliable at a single cell level (such as in the ZL H600 or SC600). This being the case, I don't feel the need of additional electronic protection, as there are already multiple levels of safety applied:
- User, myself, actively monitoring the voltage levels and usage.
- The flashlight has the electronic equivalent of the electronic protective devices included in Li-ion battery packs, under voltage/current protection.
- The charger/s I use have similar safety features, over/under voltage protection, reverse polarity protection, etc.
- The cells themselves have the final line of defense, the PTC and CID devices.
If other users choose to use cells that have another layer of protection is their choice, and there's no harm in it. I also have some protected AW cells (for certain multi-cell 18650 lights, and I use them in the ZL light too), but I don't feel it's an essential feature in a ZL H600.
Here is the Panasonic 18650 roadmap. You can see on it the 2900mAh NCR18650, the 3100mAh NCR18650A, and the 3400mAh NCR18650B: