sappyg
Enlightened
mmm..... maybe i did the math wrong....
65 fails + 180 no fails is 245...
245/ 65 = 26.5%
anyone ever had a SF fail? me no
HDS/ Ra? me yes
that's 50/50 for really good lights (as the poll is designed). not withstanding that i have 5 SFs and 2 Ra lights (early production)... these are the best torches i have ever used. CS moves Ra into top gun category for me.... faulty swich replaced no charge.
i managed to break a tailcap on a SF myself. i called SF.... i was willing to pay for a replacement.... replaced no charge
we've all noticed the poll is skewed for various reasons but still i think it is quite telling. actually i believe the true # is much lower than is being reported here. even with more than a few issues ZL is taking care of customers. sure i think QC could be better but from the time this post was created until now they are able to deal with CS effectively and still bring new products to market.
i just left their web site and saw some flashlights on clearance and the straight language used was something like 'these have memory issues so we will throw in some doo dads and discount the price rather than send then back to the factory'...... that's straight up honesty prior to sale. certainly it's cheaper than shipping and repackaging to china and back but if you know it ahead of time and can live with it there is no failure. again, QC would fix the matter more effectively. personally i would just send them back but who knows what kind of contract ZL has with the producer?

65 fails + 180 no fails is 245...
245/ 65 = 26.5%
anyone ever had a SF fail? me no
HDS/ Ra? me yes
that's 50/50 for really good lights (as the poll is designed). not withstanding that i have 5 SFs and 2 Ra lights (early production)... these are the best torches i have ever used. CS moves Ra into top gun category for me.... faulty swich replaced no charge.
i managed to break a tailcap on a SF myself. i called SF.... i was willing to pay for a replacement.... replaced no charge

we've all noticed the poll is skewed for various reasons but still i think it is quite telling. actually i believe the true # is much lower than is being reported here. even with more than a few issues ZL is taking care of customers. sure i think QC could be better but from the time this post was created until now they are able to deal with CS effectively and still bring new products to market.
i just left their web site and saw some flashlights on clearance and the straight language used was something like 'these have memory issues so we will throw in some doo dads and discount the price rather than send then back to the factory'...... that's straight up honesty prior to sale. certainly it's cheaper than shipping and repackaging to china and back but if you know it ahead of time and can live with it there is no failure. again, QC would fix the matter more effectively. personally i would just send them back but who knows what kind of contract ZL has with the producer?
