Keep in mind that Pydpiper is talking about Canadian prision a much different experiance than the average American prision.
I'm sure Canada has a range of institutions, from "supermax" to "country club", just as the US does, but it's my understanding that the Canadian penal system on average, trends twoards the lower-security, more amenities end of the spectrum where possible, than the American system does.
I'm not criticizing, a different country, (a somewhat) different culture, and that creates different needs. Who knows? A "soft" prision system that gives convicts "more to lose" and does less to diminish their humanity might be benificial. It's at least possible to argue the point.
IMO, the American penal system is very messed up. It tries to punish, rehabilitate, and segregate (warehouse away from society) criminals all at once. IMO, these are mutualy exclusive goals. Personaly, I'd like to see a two-tierd system, one for rehabilitation of non-violent, non sexual offenders, and a permanant segregation system for the violent and sexual offenders.
Incarcerating some college kid who gets busted at a Greatful Dead concert on a multi-year sentence for drug posession of LSD because they count the paper as part of the weight of the drug under mandatory sentencing guidlines, who has never assulted anyone, IMO just re-victimizes society at large with the added tax burden. And the overcrowding pressure such cases place forces the early release of violent and sexual offenders who then are free to re-offend, victimizing the public at large further.
What I'd like to see in America is a two-stage penal system, a lower level that emphasizes monitoring, and restitution (if applicable) for the non-violent offenders, and uses the savings in money and resources twoard permanant incarceration (i.e. "Coventry") for the murderers, rapists, molesters, armed robbers, and certain egregious non-violent multiple offenders, etc.
I believe that "rehabilitation" is possible for some, but it should be reserved for those who are not a physical threat to the safety of others. For those who are such a danger, the first priority the state has should be the protection of everyone else.