brightnorm
Flashaholic
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
- Messages
- 7,160
Our "closet Flashaholic" doorman showed me a shakelight he bought on the street a few days ago for $1.00. I've seen several shakelights over the years and haven't been impressed. This light surprised me.
It is quite compact and light: 7-1/8" long including rear lanyard holder. Bezel is 1-1/2" diameter and the body gradually tapers to about 1-1/8" at the tail. Weight is 2.9oz and activation is via a sliding side switch. The body is semi-transparent plastic and attractive but rather cheap-looking. (Whaddayuh want for a dollar?)
A plastic lens focuses the LED into a small spot with minimal sidespill, similar to the current KL-1 (but of course much dimmer). There are no identifying marks of any kind on the light, not even "made in China", but a large number 14 is visible through the semi- transparent body.
Maybe I haven't kept up with shakelight evolution but the performance of this light impressed me. When freshly shaken its total output was about equal to a "conventional" ARC AAA running on an L92 (lithium primary). Although its total output was significally less than than the new ARC AAA-P, its tightly focused spot (about 9" at 5 feet) was brighter than the AAA-P's hotspot, and could be superimposed upon it. The spot was surrounded by a dim corona which gave the beam an overall diameter of about 19" at 5 feet. Although most of the light was concentrated in the spot, the beam was more than adequate for night walking.
I had always assumed that shakelights provided a minimum of runtime for a maximum of "shaketime", but that didn't apply to this light. I bought it, used, from my dooman who said he had shaken it "a few times" before he came to work at night. I gave it 20 very casual nearly effortless shakes, shined it around for a minute or so, then went to bed and didn't turn it on again until last night after it had been off for about 24 hours. It lit immediately with a diminished but still usuable amount of light . Then I gave it 20 more very easy and relaxed shakes and compared it the two ARC AAAs as described earlier.
I believe that even if you were injured and in an emergency situation you could keep this light going for many hours, or even days by just giving it 3 or 4 gentle shakes from time to time. Evidently this technology has advanced considerably since the early days and a tougher waterproof version of this light might be a very handy item to keep around the house.
Brightnorm
It is quite compact and light: 7-1/8" long including rear lanyard holder. Bezel is 1-1/2" diameter and the body gradually tapers to about 1-1/8" at the tail. Weight is 2.9oz and activation is via a sliding side switch. The body is semi-transparent plastic and attractive but rather cheap-looking. (Whaddayuh want for a dollar?)
A plastic lens focuses the LED into a small spot with minimal sidespill, similar to the current KL-1 (but of course much dimmer). There are no identifying marks of any kind on the light, not even "made in China", but a large number 14 is visible through the semi- transparent body.
Maybe I haven't kept up with shakelight evolution but the performance of this light impressed me. When freshly shaken its total output was about equal to a "conventional" ARC AAA running on an L92 (lithium primary). Although its total output was significally less than than the new ARC AAA-P, its tightly focused spot (about 9" at 5 feet) was brighter than the AAA-P's hotspot, and could be superimposed upon it. The spot was surrounded by a dim corona which gave the beam an overall diameter of about 19" at 5 feet. Although most of the light was concentrated in the spot, the beam was more than adequate for night walking.
I had always assumed that shakelights provided a minimum of runtime for a maximum of "shaketime", but that didn't apply to this light. I bought it, used, from my dooman who said he had shaken it "a few times" before he came to work at night. I gave it 20 very casual nearly effortless shakes, shined it around for a minute or so, then went to bed and didn't turn it on again until last night after it had been off for about 24 hours. It lit immediately with a diminished but still usuable amount of light . Then I gave it 20 more very easy and relaxed shakes and compared it the two ARC AAAs as described earlier.
I believe that even if you were injured and in an emergency situation you could keep this light going for many hours, or even days by just giving it 3 or 4 gentle shakes from time to time. Evidently this technology has advanced considerably since the early days and a tougher waterproof version of this light might be a very handy item to keep around the house.
Brightnorm