Sub_Umbra
Flashlight Enthusiast
Challenges would be one way to put it....
This article just scratches the surface of what a bioterror or Avian flu outbreak could mean to everyday life in the Western World. It doesn't take much reading between the lines to see that something like this could make Katrina look like a papercut. Just these two points taken from the article make it quite clear what direction at least some of your planning should take:
Think about the Fed's Katrina response -- only on a much larger scale. Is that good enough for your kids?
IMO the best thing you can do for your's is to shoot for a six month food supply. If they can get food to your city, and that is one huge if, they're not going to deliver. If you're not prepared you'll be out there with all of those potentially infected people scrambling for crumbs for their loved ones in some Ad Hoc, dunderheaded distribution scheme cobbled together by some local hack politician -- you need to think about what all of this means now.
Aside from the obvious bio risks involved, in doing so you will reveal your position to your neighbors, the police, the National Guard, the Military and any looters in your locale. It is also true that under these circumstances you will actually have other, more important things that you will need to do for your family than fight with a mob every afternoon for their daily ration.
Shoot for a six month food supply and even if you can't do it, every week of isolation you can buy for you and your family will be well worth the investment. Every week that passes after the onset the new systems will tend to work better -- whether they are for food or medical aid. You just don't want to be the ones that the government learns their lessons from.
I'm not trying to come down on the government here -- it's just that it's not reasonable to think that they may be able to provide for all, in all emergencies. This has been shown again and again.
I know that there will be those who very strongly disagree with these conclusions...and that's ok. I just want to give the rest of you a nudge.
Thanks for reading,
Sub
This article just scratches the surface of what a bioterror or Avian flu outbreak could mean to everyday life in the Western World. It doesn't take much reading between the lines to see that something like this could make Katrina look like a papercut. Just these two points taken from the article make it quite clear what direction at least some of your planning should take:
Highlights mine.
- Governments will likely direct the general population to [highlight]stay in their homes,[/highlight] and to minimize social contact.
- As a result, the government may need to assume national control, as in wartime, of critical infrastructure and resources including food, fuel, and healthcare. In addition, governments will need to assume responsibility for the "last mile" in [highlight]delivery of food and other critical supplies[/highlight] to the populace.
Think about the Fed's Katrina response -- only on a much larger scale. Is that good enough for your kids?
IMO the best thing you can do for your's is to shoot for a six month food supply. If they can get food to your city, and that is one huge if, they're not going to deliver. If you're not prepared you'll be out there with all of those potentially infected people scrambling for crumbs for their loved ones in some Ad Hoc, dunderheaded distribution scheme cobbled together by some local hack politician -- you need to think about what all of this means now.
Aside from the obvious bio risks involved, in doing so you will reveal your position to your neighbors, the police, the National Guard, the Military and any looters in your locale. It is also true that under these circumstances you will actually have other, more important things that you will need to do for your family than fight with a mob every afternoon for their daily ration.
Shoot for a six month food supply and even if you can't do it, every week of isolation you can buy for you and your family will be well worth the investment. Every week that passes after the onset the new systems will tend to work better -- whether they are for food or medical aid. You just don't want to be the ones that the government learns their lessons from.
I'm not trying to come down on the government here -- it's just that it's not reasonable to think that they may be able to provide for all, in all emergencies. This has been shown again and again.
I know that there will be those who very strongly disagree with these conclusions...and that's ok. I just want to give the rest of you a nudge.
Thanks for reading,
Sub
Last edited: