SF M3 Beam shape - is it supposed to be oblong?!

Rookwood

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
131
Location
S.F Bay Area, CA - USA
Hello Forum,

I recently decided to buy my first "medium" light - a SureFire M3. It came today, and while I'm impressed with the design and construction, I'm really disappointed with the beam shape.

Both the MN10 and MN 11 bulbs throw an oblong shaped center beam. It's visible on a wall at only 2 feet away!

Do any fellow M3 owners have any thoughts on this? Is this shape normal due to the axial filament? Do you think etching the remainder of the bulb would help this? (only the tip is etched)

Thanks for any feedback you might have - this is a great place, and I've learned a heck of a lot over the past few weeks.

Chris
 

CM

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Messages
3,454
Location
Mesa, AZ
Oval is more politically correct :D And yes, many SF beams are "OVAL"
 

Rookwood

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
131
Location
S.F Bay Area, CA - USA
Re: SF M3 Beam shape - is it supposed to be oval?!

Ah, good to know. Seems that all lights have a little personality to them.

I just got in from my first playtime outside in the dark. As expected, the oval beam shape isn't nearly as noticeable on trees, the garage, the neighbor's bedroom window:whistle:, local raccoons, etc.

I think I'm going to like this light. The 125 lumens bulb is more than adequate for my non-tactical needs, but it's nice to have the 225... :naughty:

Thanks for confirming my obervations! (the beam does look 'oblong', but I'll remember to use 'oval' in the future!)

Chris
 

CLHC

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 25, 2004
Messages
6,001
Location
PNW|WA|USA
Re: SF M3 Beam shape - is it supposed to be oval?!

Greetings and Welcome!

Enjoy that SF.M3!
 

leukos

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
3,467
Location
Chicagoland
Yeah, the beam isn't as purdy on a white wall, but it is very useful outdoors. If you want to take the time, I usually fiddle with the lamp to line up the filament with flat part of the body design so that the oval is horizontal to the ground when I hold the light with my usual grip. But again, you hardly notice it outdoors, mostly you notice the nice white light. :)
 

bagman

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Messages
476
Location
GB
I use a M3 as my bright belt light on night shifts and you dont notice the beam shape as all outside.

Best of all you can run on full power on 2 of AW's new 17500's :D
 

Planterz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
1,162
Location
Tucson, AZ
The filament isn't round, it's in a horizontal line between two leads running perpendicular to the body's length. The oval beam is the reflection of the filament.
 

Size15's

Flashaholic
Joined
Aug 29, 2000
Messages
18,415
Location
Kettering, England
If the beam is round and the filament is a 'bar' then the beam does not have all the possible light it could have. The M3 is a clear example of how to create a bulb/reflector combination that does not waste light.

Al
 

Flashdark

Enlightened
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
381
Location
USA
Rockwood,

This is normal for the M3 and seems to be more noticable on this light than others. I personally like it. I orient the "football" horizontally. I live in a flat rural area so maximum left-to-right field of view is preferable. For those who live in a large city, perhaps a vertical orientation might be more advantageous. All you have to do is loosen/retighten, loosen/retighten, the head about a quarter of a turn to spin the bulb in the head and "re-orient" the football. I have done it in 10 seconds, and I have cussed for 15 minutes trying to get it just right. Once you get it just where you want it, you have to change the batteries from the tailcap end or you will disturb the "football" when you tighten the head.

Hope this helps.
 

Rookwood

Newly Enlightened
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
131
Location
S.F Bay Area, CA - USA
Thanks for all the replies...

Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts and experience.

I would now change my original comment from being 'disappointed' with the beam shape - I've been looking at a lot of Luxeon beams over the last few weeks, so I had to 'recalibrate' my expectations for incan.

I spent more time playing with this in the dark, and am really happy with the output of this baby.

leukos and Flashdark: I did exactly what you've done with aligning the filament to a predictable postition relative to the body, and now I see this beam shape as an asset for this light.

Great place you have here. Thanks for the welcome.

Cheers everyone!
Chris
 
Top