D
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
Hi everybody! I am back on CPF temporarily thanks to the help of Kubolaw who got me in through a vicarious web shell (Guardster.com) and though I can post, I cannot show pics or anything else (see my sig -- there is none 'cause it had pics in it).
Anyway if you recall I started LS-modding Legend 3AAs on DirectDrive and although the first ones were very bright (on alkalines the first one produced 488 lux, another one I kept for myself made 569 lux, a couple I put together as a favor to lemlux measured in the low 500's, all from one meter away), the latest iteration I just completed today blasted out a stunning 694 lux. And again, that was on alkalines.
For reference my Arc SLS and Lambda Illuminator and even the MiniMag Ill Pill are all in the mid- to high-200s range.
This seems to further confirm my (and everybody else's here) theory that Luxeon QC varies wildly, at least in the light output department. For your further information however, this particular Luxeon is from the latest batches manufactured. So maybe they're finally getting their act together. So if you are buying raw Luxeons, it would be advisable to try and get the latest manufacturing dates, as they seem to be consistently brighter than the older ones.
Now the brightest one up until today was the 569 lux example mentioned above, which "only" went 708 lux on lithiums. Wonder what this latest 694 jobber will do on lithiums, if it doesn't blow up on me...stay tuned (if I can get back on here again, that is).
Anyway if you recall I started LS-modding Legend 3AAs on DirectDrive and although the first ones were very bright (on alkalines the first one produced 488 lux, another one I kept for myself made 569 lux, a couple I put together as a favor to lemlux measured in the low 500's, all from one meter away), the latest iteration I just completed today blasted out a stunning 694 lux. And again, that was on alkalines.
For reference my Arc SLS and Lambda Illuminator and even the MiniMag Ill Pill are all in the mid- to high-200s range.
This seems to further confirm my (and everybody else's here) theory that Luxeon QC varies wildly, at least in the light output department. For your further information however, this particular Luxeon is from the latest batches manufactured. So maybe they're finally getting their act together. So if you are buying raw Luxeons, it would be advisable to try and get the latest manufacturing dates, as they seem to be consistently brighter than the older ones.
Now the brightest one up until today was the 569 lux example mentioned above, which "only" went 708 lux on lithiums. Wonder what this latest 694 jobber will do on lithiums, if it doesn't blow up on me...stay tuned (if I can get back on here again, that is).