New XO?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Illum

Flashaholic
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
13,053
Location
Central Florida, USA
I dont understand why they made one w/o the optics, thats what the inovas are known for.

old XO: http://www.flashlightreviews.com/reviews/inova_xo.htm
Runtime: [non-dimming] 4 hours to 50%
Throw: 884
Output: 2000
things to note: Mine, great light, best for EDC in my collection

New XO: http://www.flashlightreviews.com/reviews/inova_xo-r.htm
Runtime:[rollercoaster] 1.5 hours to 50%
Throw: 792
Output: 3700
things to note: rollercoaster regulation, no optics, bigger head

For an extra 1700 worth of output sacrifice 2.5 hours of runtime...jeez WHAT ARE THEY THINKING???
 

chiphead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 16, 2003
Messages
1,155
Location
Hutto,TX
That's OK, I think I'll keep(X0,X5,X3) what I've got! The old adage: IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT, should be etched in stone somewhere.

chiphead
 

nerdgineer

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
2,778
Location
Southern California
dmz said:
Is the regulation really that bad?
Opinions differ. The sample QB got really is that bad. Some of us think it was a bad sample and that a proper new XO would behave better. However, QB has told it like he saw it, and unless Inova sends him another sample which tests differently, he's - properly - sticking by what he saw.

If anyone else gets one and it behaves differently, then we might now; but no one has come forth so far.
 

InfidelCastro

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
2,266
Location
USA
nerdgineer said:
Opinions differ. The sample QB got really is that bad. Some of us think it was a bad sample and that a proper new XO would behave better. However, QB has told it like he saw it, and unless Inova sends him another sample which tests differently, he's - properly - sticking by what he saw.

If anyone else gets one and it behaves differently, then we might now; but no one has come forth so far.


He says he called them and Inova said that's normal with the new 'semi-regulated' version.

I believe someone else also got a sample of the new one and got the same results. I can't remember who.
 

dmz

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
623
New owners of the new XO please give us your feedback.
 

steve_vance

Enlightened
Joined
Feb 27, 2003
Messages
474
Location
Bucks County,Penna
InfidelCastro said:
He says he called them and Inova said that's normal with the new 'semi-regulated' version.

I don't know who he spoke to, but that's wrong information. Here are the facts: what actually happened is that Doug @ flashlightreviews emailed Matt@Inova, who was away on a trip. when he came back, he investigated the situation and found that one production run received the wrong boards (as in NOT the ones Inova ordered) and sent Doug a new sample. SEE TODAY'S POST the light is now rated 5 stars and the regulation problem is now nonexistent. IF you get an XO with the bad board, send it back and they will replace it.

READ THE NEW REVIEW @ QUICKBEAM's SIGHT
 

dmz

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
623
I wish Inova named it something else instead of XO. It just makes it complicated since many don't know of the new version.
 

chesterqw

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
1,968
Location
singapore,jurong
the xo-r has the same regulation as the OLD xo

quickbeam updated his site.

i would but the xo-r, pop it open and then put some nice cyan or blue or royal blue luxeon in it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top