Opinions differ. The sample QB got really is that bad. Some of us think it was a bad sample and that a proper new XO would behave better. However, QB has told it like he saw it, and unless Inova sends him another sample which tests differently, he's - properly - sticking by what he saw.dmz said:Is the regulation really that bad?
nerdgineer said:Opinions differ. The sample QB got really is that bad. Some of us think it was a bad sample and that a proper new XO would behave better. However, QB has told it like he saw it, and unless Inova sends him another sample which tests differently, he's - properly - sticking by what he saw.
If anyone else gets one and it behaves differently, then we might now; but no one has come forth so far.
InfidelCastro said:He says he called them and Inova said that's normal with the new 'semi-regulated' version.
I don't know who he spoke to, but that's wrong information. Here are the facts: what actually happened is that Doug @ flashlightreviews emailed Matt@Inova, who was away on a trip. when he came back, he investigated the situation and found that one production run received the wrong boards (as in NOT the ones Inova ordered) and sent Doug a new sample. SEE TODAY'S POST the light is now rated 5 stars and the regulation problem is now nonexistent. IF you get an XO with the bad board, send it back and they will replace it.
READ THE NEW REVIEW @ QUICKBEAM's SIGHT