o-ring retained bulbs which are not fixed in the ideal position like Surefire lamps
some people call that adjustability- something surefire lacks in it's beam... some people might consider it a feature rather than a problem...
their T series being blatant intellectual theft of Surefire's classic series
the idea of a tube containing batteries with a lamp at one end is no longer a cutting edge new technology... it's previous art, it's common public domain knowledge... many companies sell similar products with similar names and don't care- funny how sometimes only the blind faith follower sees a problem where there isn't..
springs wound BACKWARDS so they dig in and bind
I've used a number of G&P type lamps that are essencially of the same design as the digilight- and have never experienced this problem.... In fact.. my Surefire P91 LA digs and grinds just as much as any other LA I have used..
How about being stuck with a single source for replacement lamps which is often out of stock
actually you can use LAs from surefire, digilight, G&P, wolf eyes.... and many other sources in digilight bodies.. I've seen surefire "out of stock" on LAs before.. it happens to the best of them.... But rest assured- whether you buy the Surefire or the digilight, you have LOTS of sources for lamps that work great.
How about a marketing strategy bordering on "snake oil sales" where you promise Greater lumen output with LESS energy consumed in defiance of the laws of physics?
Let's not even get into the gray market topic of consumers NOT knowing which version of a lamp will be received when they order one..."only the one's filled with magic pixie gas" are desireable.
you're just flat out bashing... it's mostly rude.... but I suppose we could let it slide... the sad thing is that I'll be frowned upon by most people around here for supporting the underdog while still apreciating Surefire... you'll get priased for blowing things way out of proportion and looking at every aspect in a completally single sided manner...
Tends to be that SUrefire lamps are very consistant in quality, power consumption, and output... This is a good thing... but on the other hand- It's nice to know SOME-ONE out there is doing a little work to TRY to bring better lamps to market- WHen Surefire makes a new flashlight or LA- they are praised. When they make a $270 light with more bugs that windows98 they are forgiven by the faithfull followers... when other companies make mistakes- the Surefire fanatics start bashing all over them- why? this isn't fair...
the "because surefire did it first" arguement doesn't work eithor.... the idea of using batteries, regardless of their type, and a bulb, and a reflector, and a tube, and a switch, is all common knowledge. Surefire didn't invent the lightbulb, or the LED, or the battery, or the switch... The same arguement could be made that they are taking advantage of those prior inventions that costed someone else huge R&D to develop..
[edit in] forgot to mention- that Surefires warrenty and service is outstanding in comparison to other manufactures- the fact that they will often send replacement lamps when they blow "prematurly" is a testiment to their good customer relations.. Thet did this for me and I am very pleased... so there is definetally a point to be made there that i DO agree with... just comes at a price..
[edit in again] pointing the "snake oil tactics" finger... while surefire continues to push the use of it's CR123s, in lights that burn through entire sets of them in 20 minuts flat, is kindof hypocritical... It's very obvious to me that Surefire is perposly not encorperating li-ion rechargability into their line to draw out the number of primaries they can sell... Seems like a snake oily battery tactic to me... digilight is actually offering some li-ion versions of their lights..