Joe Talmadge
Flashlight Enthusiast
Got my Liteflux 1. My general impressions:
The most important difference, for me, is that the LF1's low is noticeably lower than the L1T's. LF1's low is only slightly brighter than my Raw 1W's low! Just what I was looking for. Also love the constant-low/momentary-hi mode.
Other differences:
- LF1 is white, L1T is greener. However, I don't care much about this, since it's mostly apparent on white walls. In use, the L1T didn't bother me.
- LF1's switch throw is longer, which I don't like. If LF is going to invest in something to improve, this is it. I do like the fact that it's a clickie versus L1T's reverse quickie, but on balance, I'd rather use L1T's switch currently.
- L1T's smooth coating makes the light feel more refined, but in use, I like the LF1's rougher coating.
Overall, lower low plus constant-low/momentary-hi mode make the LF1 the light that meets my needs better, so far. We'll see if I get annoyed with the switch.
Joe
The most important difference, for me, is that the LF1's low is noticeably lower than the L1T's. LF1's low is only slightly brighter than my Raw 1W's low! Just what I was looking for. Also love the constant-low/momentary-hi mode.
Other differences:
- LF1 is white, L1T is greener. However, I don't care much about this, since it's mostly apparent on white walls. In use, the L1T didn't bother me.
- LF1's switch throw is longer, which I don't like. If LF is going to invest in something to improve, this is it. I do like the fact that it's a clickie versus L1T's reverse quickie, but on balance, I'd rather use L1T's switch currently.
- L1T's smooth coating makes the light feel more refined, but in use, I like the LF1's rougher coating.
Overall, lower low plus constant-low/momentary-hi mode make the LF1 the light that meets my needs better, so far. We'll see if I get annoyed with the switch.
Joe