LifeNRA
Flashaholic*
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2004
- Messages
- 1,453
Why are reporters allowed in areas where everyone has been evacuated? I am talking about areas where the local authorities have forced the population to evacuate not where it is suggested that you leave.
Every year we see reporters in natural disaster areas where the local population has been forced to leave.
Why are they allowed in when everyone else is forced to leave "for their safety".
Are reporters that cheap to replace <-joke, or are they just more special than the common folk?
We see reporters telling us how dangerous it is to be there in the middle of a hurricane or other such disaster and how no one should be there. Yet there they are giving a report.
I have always wondered about this. Doesn't make much sense to me.
Every year we see reporters in natural disaster areas where the local population has been forced to leave.
Why are they allowed in when everyone else is forced to leave "for their safety".
Are reporters that cheap to replace <-joke, or are they just more special than the common folk?
We see reporters telling us how dangerous it is to be there in the middle of a hurricane or other such disaster and how no one should be there. Yet there they are giving a report.
I have always wondered about this. Doesn't make much sense to me.