DIY 500 lumens headlamp!

TigerhawkT3

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
3,819
Location
CA, 94087
This belongs in the EL/HL/Hyb forums.

Pretty cool - interesting tradeoff between brightness and color rendition.
 

wasBlinded

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,222
Location
Oklahoma
That is very impressive. This guy shows a lot of original thought and ingenuity. It does make me wonder what it would be like to ride at night on the trail with a cyan headlamp. Seems kind of weird:thinking: , but maybe it would work just fine.
 

eart

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
146
nakahoshi said:
no hotlinking :sssh:

I thought about it, but then i realized that if anything I'm _driving_ traffic to their website. That made everything ok.
 

IsaacHayes

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 30, 2003
Messages
5,876
Location
Missouri
It's against CPF rules though to hotlink an image from another website.

I saw the pic and thought, wow, cyan? Then I saw it really was! I doubt 500lumens since those are only lux1, that would mean 120lm per star! But he is re-rating them for how your eyes perceive the color as brighter. But still unless he got some R bin and drives them at lux3 levels, I don't think it's that high. They gotta be pushed pretty hard.

The pic looks like real cyan but cameras always do that. I wonder what color it is in real life and what bins he used? I love true cyan!

I bet it sure is a site to behold and freak out "normal" people :D I know my lights spook others.
 

TigerhawkT3

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
3,819
Location
CA, 94087
Just save the pic to your computer, upload it to an image host like www.imageshack.us, and hotlink that. That'll drive traffic to their site without sucking up as much bandwidth.
 

billw

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Messages
295
Location
SF Bay Area
The "500 lumen" number is derived rather creatively. They apparently start with about 50lm/w for
the 1W cyan luxeons, multiply by 2.5 because of the increased eye sensitivity at that frequency,
then Double again because they're overdriving them to 2W and assuming the same 50lm/W
number because of their "adequate heatsink", and then multiply by four for four separate
emitters. The whole cyan idea is "interesting" and this does indeed sound like a very bright and
effective headlamp, but "500 lumens" is "marketing speak."
 

Sawtooth

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Messages
104
Location
New Mexico
I may have missed something there, but I really don't think that cyan will be useful for night vision (aka scotopic vision) at all. That wavelength destroys the rhodopsin that makes the rods (rod cells) ultra-sensitive at night. You need red light to preserve scotopic vision. The reason that things look greyish (what some might consider bluish) at night under low light is that the rods only have a single type of light sensitive pigment (cones have 3 to give us color vision).

You could certainly get >500 lumens out of 4 Red/Orange Lux IIIs though. They deliver 190lm each. (But are apparently heat sensitive and lose alot of efficiency at higher temperatures).

I think the mod is cool, but the guy's info on night vision seems wrong to me -- cyan is not a special wavelength to see better at night....
 

Sawtooth

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Messages
104
Location
New Mexico
Sawtooth said:
I may have missed something there, but I really don't think that cyan will be useful for night vision (aka scotopic vision) at all. That wavelength destroys the rhodopsin that makes the rods (rod cells) ultra-sensitive at night. You need red light to preserve scotopic vision. The reason that things look greyish (what some might consider bluish) at night under low light is that the rods only have a single type of light sensitive pigment (cones have 3 to give us color vision).

You could certainly get >500 lumens out of 4 Red/Orange Lux IIIs though. They deliver 190lm each. (But are apparently heat sensitive and lose alot of efficiency at higher temperatures).

I think the mod is cool, but the guy's info on night vision seems wrong to me -- cyan is not a special wavelength to see better at night....

But of course, Lux III R/O probably also emit at too low of a wavelength to preserve night vision... You probably need to go to red LEDs...
 

Meduza

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
421
Location
Sweden
No cyan is not a special wavelength at night, but your eyes are much more sensetive to cyan than to other wavelenghts.
 

Martini

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
262
Location
The Magic City
Yes, your eyes are very sensitive to cyan, but that's not really a good thing. The cyan Luxeons have a median wavelength of 505nm; the peak absorption wavelength for rhodopsin is 498. Cyan light will destroy rhodopsin rapidly, completely crippling your night vision. And since it takes about 30 minutes to replenish, you're completely out of the game if the light goes out. You'll actually get a few more lumens out of a green LuxI, and it will do far less damage to your night vision. Red-orange might be the best. At 617nm, it's effect on rhodopsin is negligible, and it's more visible than red (in addition to putting out more lumens at the same power).

I'll bet that guy really makes enemies quick, blinding all the other cyclists and killing their night vision.
 

iamerror

Enlightened
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
253
Location
Nevada, USA
I thought the headlamp was cool, I just am not quite sure how well the cyan would work. I had a couple questions about it if anyone can answer them.

Could alkaline AA cells, rather than nimh, work for something like this? Would 4 white Luxeon Batwings work with this?
 

PeLu

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 26, 2001
Messages
1,712
Location
Linz, Austria
If it is only the luminous flux in Lumen you care about, every good ceiling burner carbide lamp should be able to give you more than 500lm....
 

chris_m

Enlightened
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
383
Location
England
Not even that impressive when you consider that my triple Cree gives out nearly 400 real lumens for 8W, and a similar one made with Q3s would give nearly 500 real white lumens.
 

AndrewL

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
105
chris_m said:
Not even that impressive when you consider that my triple Cree gives out nearly 400 real lumens for 8W, and a similar one made with Q3s would give nearly 500 real white lumens.
Is that out the front or at the LEDs? I always get a bit lost with the torch V bulb lumens and IIRC LED with optics don't loose the same as a bulb with a reflector

If I could solder (and had seen your tripple Cree first) I doubt I'd be using the bulbs I just bought
 

chris_m

Enlightened
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
383
Location
England
That's at the LEDs and based on keeping them cooler than I probably actually do. Given the way 500W is claimed though I didn't really see the point in scaling back to reality! The optics claim 90% efficiency, so should be ~350 lumens out the front.

Not like I'm the first with a triple Cree, but certainly in the vanguard. Will take some piccies tonight.
 

AndrewL

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
105
so optics are a lot better then reflectors and lenses by the sound of it (assuming I'm getting 65% from my MR16 enclosed bulbs)
 

woodfluter

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
142
Martini said:
Yes, your eyes are very sensitive to cyan, but that's not really a good thing. The cyan Luxeons have a median wavelength of 505nm; the peak absorption wavelength for rhodopsin is 498. Cyan light will destroy rhodopsin rapidly, completely crippling your night vision.

Good points, and I freely admit I don't know the answers, but I wonder if night vision isn't irrelevant here. Say you are cycling in traffic, with street lights. For me, my night vision is completely gone in that situation. I have very good and sensitive vision in near-dark conditions, but with any ambient light, forget about it! Perhaps the headlamp wavelength that provides the best step up in perception is the best. As I said, just don't know...

- Bill
 
Top