Sub_Umbra said:
Many of the same who admit that it takes time and practice to learn to fly a jet will often just throw up their arms and declare that any light that doesn't look just like the sun is useless.
And the funny thing about that is LEDs, at least the ones which fall around 5500K, are much closer to the sun than any other focuseable light source, except HID. Sure, they're lacking a bit in some parts of the spectrum but the light quality feels a lot more natural than incandescent which is horribly deficient on the blue end of the spectrum.
As for disliking blue tint, I'd probably say that once you get over about 7000K the blue starts to become a little distracting but I can still live with it. Go much over 8000K though and I find it obnoxious. I think that the problem is really that most LEDs have a bluish-purple tint rather than a sky blue tint. If the latter was the case, I would personally find the blue tint more tolerable. I think others would as well. As an experiment try mixing a small amount of 490 nm blue (often called "Tokyo blue") with pure white LEDs. The resulting tint is much more pleasant than the blue-purple tint common to white LEDs.
All that being said, I've always found the strong yellowish tint of incandescents to be far more annoying than the mild bluish tint of some LEDs. This goes way back to my child before we even had white LEDs or CPF. I actually preferred even the severely lacking cool white halophosphor fluorescents of the day to incandescent. At least they made white look white even if they distorted some other colors. LEDs, even slightly tinted ones, are way, way better than those crappy old school fluorescents.
I also believe that the years spent under incandescents by many people have conditioned them to this type of light which is another reason some dislike a blue tint. It's only once you start using more natural light, such as 5000K high-CRI fluorescent, and get used to it, that you realize how bad incandescent really is.