Hello Peter,
It seems that quite a few members here have more than one color LS in their quivers. Would you consider making a double ended 123 battery holder. By this I mean 2 of your current 123 holders basically connected at their tail end. The holder would contain two 123 batteries so a LS head could be attached functionally at each end. I realize that this would require a second operation in machining but the milling for lanyard operation could be omitted. I have no idea how the volume for interest would compare to the volume required for a cost effective run.
An additional SKU which would require a new design would be a dummy cap that would replace a LS head and essentially convert one end of this doubled ended holder into a spare battery compartment for the LS.
From the outside looking in, this proposition would seem to require little mechanical engineering time and resources and and no elctronic engineering time. I assume that if the demand for these units was in keeping with the required minimum run of parts that this would be a viable part. Perhaps it could displace the single AA holder if that part sees little use in the real world as I have sensed at least here in the forum.
With nothing but respect and admiration, I await your responce and a no responce would be understood and accepted as well.
- Don
It seems that quite a few members here have more than one color LS in their quivers. Would you consider making a double ended 123 battery holder. By this I mean 2 of your current 123 holders basically connected at their tail end. The holder would contain two 123 batteries so a LS head could be attached functionally at each end. I realize that this would require a second operation in machining but the milling for lanyard operation could be omitted. I have no idea how the volume for interest would compare to the volume required for a cost effective run.
An additional SKU which would require a new design would be a dummy cap that would replace a LS head and essentially convert one end of this doubled ended holder into a spare battery compartment for the LS.
From the outside looking in, this proposition would seem to require little mechanical engineering time and resources and and no elctronic engineering time. I assume that if the demand for these units was in keeping with the required minimum run of parts that this would be a viable part. Perhaps it could displace the single AA holder if that part sees little use in the real world as I have sensed at least here in the forum.
With nothing but respect and admiration, I await your responce and a no responce would be understood and accepted as well.
- Don