I don't think that any one will argue the brilliance of Peter's Arc LS. Certainly there are brighter lights using the Luxeon Star and I suspect Peter's next generation LS will be brighter within safe parameters.
Additionally, I don't think anyone will argue the fact that the current Arc Battery holders are certainly functional if not feature rich. The 123 holder makes an incredibly compact unit.
I personally prefer the LOTC and the SF E1 as discussed mates with a simple modification to the Arc LS head. This combo has become part of my EDC and it's great.
This may appear a rehash of previous posts but I would like to point out one subtle difference. The light in the photo is being powered by a single AA battery. I had a feeling that I had been missing something and it finally came to me. The mod needs a 1/2" spacer for the 123 to work. A AA battery fits in without a spacer. It will actually work without a "fattening" sleeve around the AA but I think a simple expansion sleeve would be a good idea.
I just discovered that a light I really like has a bonus feature! I'll probably stick with the 123's but it's nice to know that in a pinch, this light can be fed on lower, cheaper octane.
- Don
EDIT: [ Peter, I don't know where you stand on a production tail switch battery holder. You have probably already considered what I discovered here. For what it's worth, I would vote for a holder that was deep enough to take the AA and require a spacer for the 123. The light's overall length is still great.]
Additionally, I don't think anyone will argue the fact that the current Arc Battery holders are certainly functional if not feature rich. The 123 holder makes an incredibly compact unit.
I personally prefer the LOTC and the SF E1 as discussed mates with a simple modification to the Arc LS head. This combo has become part of my EDC and it's great.
This may appear a rehash of previous posts but I would like to point out one subtle difference. The light in the photo is being powered by a single AA battery. I had a feeling that I had been missing something and it finally came to me. The mod needs a 1/2" spacer for the 123 to work. A AA battery fits in without a spacer. It will actually work without a "fattening" sleeve around the AA but I think a simple expansion sleeve would be a good idea.
I just discovered that a light I really like has a bonus feature! I'll probably stick with the 123's but it's nice to know that in a pinch, this light can be fed on lower, cheaper octane.
- Don
EDIT: [ Peter, I don't know where you stand on a production tail switch battery holder. You have probably already considered what I discovered here. For what it's worth, I would vote for a holder that was deep enough to take the AA and require a spacer for the 123. The light's overall length is still great.]