Saddams Killer R/C UAV's, here in the USA?

Daniel Ramsey

Retired Account
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
901
Location
Wasilla, Alaska, \
Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

I am just now hearing on FOX NEWS about the possibility of UAV's that are GPS guided and may already be in the US waiting to be sent out to targets of opportunity.

I think its time for us to start keeping a good eye open just in case, like investigating R/C model plane clubs, areas where targets are prime for such aircraft to dispurse either explosive or biological weapons.
 

Silviron

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 24, 2001
Messages
2,477
Location
New Mexico, USA
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

When I first heard of Saddam's "Unmanned Drones" I thought they were talking about Alec Baldwin, Martin Sheen, bill clinton and Jimmah Carter.

I wouldn't worry about it, even if I lived in a major target area . Unlikely that they could do much damage, even if they did manage to get them over here, launched and guided correctly...
 

Daniel Ramsey

Retired Account
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
901
Location
Wasilla, Alaska, \
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

I have an unfinished 1/4 scale R/C aircraft just a bit smaller than this one...

sebast.jpg


think its just a toy now?
 

Daniel Ramsey

Retired Account
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
901
Location
Wasilla, Alaska, \
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Here is another, these are pretty big but can be built easily, for an ARF (almost ready to fly) they can be bought for under $1,000, radio about $200 and up, engines from $400 and up. Extras can be live broadcast video gear with onboard cameras, autopilot governed by GPS or telemetry GPS to ground station.
I could easily build something under $5,000 that can be piloted remotely to a precision waypoint, and those 9/11 hijackers were never interested in landing those planes!
Most worrisome is the amount of a payload these can carry like a mini-cropduster, just one of these can overfly ALL of Walt Disney World in 15 minutes spraying anthrax or other biotoxins and still return to a location a mile or two away, the operator could possibly just drive around in a van, be in a small airplane himself guiding this mini bio-buzzbomb.
leroux1.jpg
 

Silviron

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 24, 2001
Messages
2,477
Location
New Mexico, USA
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Well, unless you are using it for commercial aerial photography, scientific telemetry, etc. then Yes, it is a toy...

But, it's not the technology of the planes I'm talking about: It is the realities of the propogation of airborne toxins that limit the effectiveness as a weapon.

It's just not a practical delivery system to deliver a massive dose, and even people in a specific target area would have a real good chance of survival.

A hand grenade or bio-toxin "grenade" or even a small aerosol spray of a nasty virus in a subway, or someplace like a big indoor concert would probably kill a lot more people and have a higher chance of success.
 

James S

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 27, 2002
Messages
5,078
Location
on an island surrounded by reality
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Perhaps we could form an R/C Civil Defense Corps, outfit our own planes with rc to rc missiles and be ready to defend our parks, cities and recreation area's from evil rc drones.

I'd be up for flying some recon duty.

I offer this slightly toung in cheek. But the call to investigate local RC clubs strikes me as ludicrous unless the government has specific intelligence. This is another example of how ordinary Americans can do way better than the police. If you're in an RC club and you see someone demonstrating their super crop duster model with working pipes and distribution system then perhaps you had better call the fbi rather than just deciding that they will do all the work for us.

As for the fact that it's not a decent delivery method, you don't need to deliver very much to create terror. So now, by the time my kids are old enough to play with these things I won't be able to build model rockets or planes with them. Those are both things I enjoyed and was looking forward to sharing with my kids. Will I have to register my models and get myself and my kids fingerprinted before we can take them out doors?

homeland paralysis.
 

Daniel Ramsey

Retired Account
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
901
Location
Wasilla, Alaska, \
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

But terrorists are not really into effectiveness, just plain terror! If only a single person was killed it will have similar effects as a thousand!
Now on the newswire they are showing conventional UAV's, ones that can travel hundreds of miles, costing a lot of money and easily traceable.

But what if....OBL has operatives all across our country with model R/C aircraft such as this? We can debate or debunk theories till the sun supernovas but realistically these terrorists whoever they may be will use whats available HERE!
And if I can build one of these so can they.
With a small fire extinguisher filled with who knows what I can connect the release lever to either a CO2 cylinder or a servomotor linkage easier than you can imagine.
Also is R/C helicopters.
Anyway about it just because it looks like an absurd idea it becomes many more times likely to be employed just for that very reason.

Here is a similar thread over at Glock Talk that may in other ways discuss this current threat, over there we are discussing how to bring one of these down, I may consider reloading some 12 gauge shotshells with incendiary or flare rounds.

<font color="red"> And I really apologize for scaring folks, go back to your comfy pocket of security and ignore everything in the world, or keep on protesting removing evil from the face of the earth. </font>
 

Daniel Ramsey

Retired Account
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
901
Location
Wasilla, Alaska, \
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Another scenario, (I really love scaring the sheeple /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif)

Buying those large ESTES model rocket kits and using them as biological flying missiles, what is optimum distance of say a 45-60degree trajectory, a mile? If they can go 2,500' vertical they can travel further on a high ballistic trajectory, add a little "payload" /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/eek.gif
 

Empath

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 11, 2001
Messages
8,508
Location
Oregon
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

[ QUOTE ]
And I really apologize for scaring folks, go back to your comfy pocket of security and ignore everything in the world, or keep on protesting removing evil from the face of the earth.

[/ QUOTE ]

All of these "what if" worries are the EXACT objective of terrorists, and it appears some play right into their hands. The "what if" scenarios cannot be eliminated. Those that don't exhibit extraordinary paranoid behavior are not "ignoring everything in the world, and protesting the removal of evil from the face of the earth". They are simply aware that there is reasonable behavior and unreasonable. They are the ones staring the 'terrorists' in the face and not crumbling to their whims.

Threats of "what if" are not the exclusive domain of terrorists. "What if" and the real threat of all types of massive impact and terror is constantly with us even domestically. The threat of some person dedicated to suicide and wanting to go out with a bang could pull off some unimaginable acts that could take thousands with them. Some school kid with their parents firearms could take their classmates, and have. Some weirdo with a bit of planning could impact huge segments of the population for no reason than to see it in the headlines of the newspapers. These are things we're always dealing with, and guarding against. The political and religious zealots bent on striking terror into peoples lives do not have a monopoly on terror. Terror and death have been an instrument politically for ages, and the greatest threat usually comes from individuals and small groups that think in extremes, plotting assassinations, destroying others because others 'might' have the potential to strike, and fearing groups, countries, religions, and peoples because of "what if".
 

NightStorm

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
1,090
Location
Between a rock & a hard place.
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Thank you Empath,

I have stopped typing my original response as I could not have said it better myself. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbsup.gif

Dan
 

Silviron

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 24, 2001
Messages
2,477
Location
New Mexico, USA
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Thanks, Empath.

I refuse to live in fear of "what ifs" too.

Yes, the terrorist caused death of just one more person on American soil will cause panic among the "sheeple" almost as much as if they kill thousands at once, because half of our population are a bunch of fools and don't understand the odds against such silly James Bondian / comic book plots actually affecting them directly.

I'm not saying it couldn't happen, I'm just saying that the odds are against it being any more effective than a guy with a spray bottle full of nastiness in a crowd somewhere, and the logistics of something like that are a thousand times easier.

I know a silly young woman here in my little mountain resort town (It isn't even on most maps, so that even with a GPS the ragheads are unlikely to be able to find it even if they wanted to.) that now lives in CONSTANT fear that the islamofasicsts are going to poison our village water wells, or that some bearded, wild-eyed raghead with an AK-47 will be knocking on her door some night. Now with this announcement, she will be looking at the sky in fear and hiding under the bed every time she hears someone start up their "weed whacker" or chainsaw.

Yes, it is wise to be prepared and be observant, but to live in constant worry about such things is just pitiful.

P.S. If you want to knock an "unmanned drone" out of the sky with a conventional shoulder fired weapon, I recommend a 10ga loaded with #4 buck. One would have to be a world class shot AND incredibly lucky to do it with a 12 ga flare.

Oh, I will be willing to worry about it if they ever figure out how to make a five pound nuclear bomb. Now THAT would be a practical weapon to put in your big toy airplane.
 

Anarchocap

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
452
Location
Arizona, USA
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

[ QUOTE ]
Well North Korea could launch a missile at Japan, in return Japan sends a secret nuke back, what if?

[/ QUOTE ]
Why would NK want to send anything to Japan when they can already reach the United States with their Nuclear weapons?! Gee. I wonder why we aren't building up 200,000 troops in SK for a NK invasion?!

This is all a load of crap. I mean seriously folks, if Saddam has all this nasty and sneaky stuff, why hasn't he used it already? I mean comon. He has been wanting to nail Israel for so long, and you don't think he would have with one of these planes already or anything else? He already lobbed Scuds at Israel when he had the chance.

Honestly, the tail is wagging the dog here. The administration is trying so damn hard to justify attacking Iraq, all the while not being able to present any proof other than pure speculation and "what-if" scenarios. Its a sad joke.

And here is some perspective on the real ability for RC/GPS controlled UAVs to deliver any real threat to this country. Our own government is acting more like a terrorist than Saddam is with this goofy story.

[ QUOTE ]
A Soldier's Viewpoint on Surviving Nuclear, Chemical and Biological
Attacks
From: SFC Red Thomas (Ret)
Armor Master Gunner
Mesa, AZ

Unlimited reproduction and distribution is authorized. Just give me
credit for my work, and, keep in context.

Since the media has decided to scare everyone with predictions of
chemical, biological, or nuclear warfare on our turf I decided to write a
paper and keep things in their proper perspective. I am a retired military
weapons, munitions, and training expert.

Lesson number one: In the mid 1990s there were a series of nerve gas
attacks on crowded Japanese subway stations. Given perfect conditions for an
attack less than 10% of the people there were injured (the injured were
better in a few hours) and only one percent of the injured died.

60 Minutes once had a fellow telling us that one drop of nerve gas
could kill a thousand people, well he didn't tell you the thousand dead
people per drop was theoretical.

Drill Sergeants exaggerate how terrible this stuff was to keep the
recruits awake in class (I know this because I was a Drill Sergeant too).
Forget everything you've ever seen on TV, in the movies, or read in a novel
about this stuff, it was all a lie (read this sentence again out loud!).
These weapons are about terror, if you remain calm, you will probably not
die. This is far less scary than the media and their "Experts," make it sound.

Chemical Weapons

Chemical weapons are categorized as nerve, blood, blister, and
Incapacitating agents. Contrary to the hype of reporters and politicians they
are not weapons of mass destruction they are "area denial," and terror
weapons that don't destroy anything. When you leave the area you almost
always leave the risk. That's the difference; you can leave the area and the
risk but soldiers may have to stay put and sit through it and that's why they
need all that spiffy gear.

These are not gasses, they are vapors and/or air borne particles. The
agent must be delivered in sufficient quantity to kill/injure, and that
defines when/how it's used. Every day we have a morning and evening inversion
where "stuff," suspended in the air gets pushed down. This inversion is why
allergies (pollen) and air pollution are worst at these times of the day.

So, a chemical attack will have it's best effect an hour of so either
side of sunrise/sunset. Also, being vapors and airborne particles they are
heavier than air so they will seek low places like ditches, basements and
underground garages. This stuff won't work when it's freezing, it doesn't
last when it's hot, and wind spreads it too thin too fast. They've got to get
this stuff on you, or, get you to inhale it for it to work. They also have to
get the concentration of chemicals high enough to kill or wound you. Too
little and it's nothing, too much and it's wasted.

What I hope you've gathered by this point is that a chemical weapons
attack that kills a lot of people is incredibly hard to do with military
grade agents and equipment so you can imagine how hard it will be for
terrorists. The more you know about this stuff the more you realize how hard
it is to use.

We'll start by talking about nerve agents. You have these in your
house, plain old bug killer (like Raid) is nerve agent. All nerve agents work
the same way; they are cholinesterase inhibitors that mess up the signals
your nervous system uses to make your body function. It can harm you if you
get it on your skin but it works best if they can get you to inhale it. If
you don't die in the first minute and you can leave the area you're probably
gonna live. The military's antidote for all nerve agents is atropine and
pralidoxime chloride. Neither one of these does anything to cure the nerve
agent, they send your body into overdrive to keep you alive for five minutes,
after that the agent is used up. Your best protection is fresh air and
staying calm.

Listed below are the symptoms for nerve agent poisoning:

Sudden headache, Dimness of vision (someone you're looking at will have
pinpointed pupils), runny nose, excessive saliva or drooling, difficulty
breathing, tightness in chest, nausea, stomach cramps, twitching of exposed
skin where a liquid just got on you.

If you are in public and you start experiencing these symptoms, first
ask yourself, did anything out of the ordinary just happen, a loud pop, did
someone spray something on the crowd? Are other people getting sick too? Is
there an odor of new mown hay, green corn, something fruity, or camphor where
it shouldn't be? If the answer is yes, then calmly (if you panic you breathe
faster and inhale more air/poison) leave the area and head up wind, or,
outside.

Fresh air is the best "right now antidote." If you have a blob of
liquid that looks like molasses or Kayro syrup on you; blot it or scrape it
off and away from yourself with anything disposable. This stuff works based
on your body weight, what a crop duster uses to kill bugs won't hurt you
unless you stand there and breathe it in real deep, then lick the residue off
the ground for a while. Remember they have to do all the work, they have to
get the concentration up and keep it up for several minutes while all you
have to do is quit getting it on you/quit breathing it by putting space
between you and the attack.

Blood agents are cyanide or arsine which effect your blood's ability to
provide oxygen to your tissue. The scenario for attack would be the same as
nerve agent. Look for a pop or someone splashing/spraying something and folks
around there getting woozy/falling down. The telltale smells are bitter
almonds or garlic where it shouldn't be. The symptoms are blue lips, blue
under the fingernails rapid breathing.

The military's antidote is amyl nitride and just like nerve agent
antidote it just keeps your body working for five minutes till the toxins are
used up. Fresh air is the your best individual chance.

Blister agents (distilled mustard) are so nasty that nobody wants to
even handle it let alone use it. It's almost impossible to handle safely and
may have delayed effect of up to 12 hours. The attack scenario is also
limited to the things you'd see from other chemicals. If you do get large,
painful blisters for no apparent reason, don't pop them, if you must, don't
let the liquid from the blister get on any other area, the stuff just keeps
on spreading. It's just as likely to harm the user as the target. Soap,
water, sunshine, and fresh air are this stuff's enemy.

Bottom line on chemical weapons (it's the same if they use industrial
chemical spills); they are intended to make you panic, to terrorize you, to
heard you like sheep to the wolves. If there is an attack, leave the area and
go upwind, or to the sides of the wind stream. They have to get the stuff to
you, and on you. You're more likely to be hurt by a drunk driver on any given
day than be hurt by one of these attacks. Your odds get better if you leave
the area. Soap, water, time, and fresh air really deal this stuff a
knock-out-punch. Don't let fear of an isolated attack rule your life. The
odds are really on your side.

Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear bombs. These are the only weapons of mass destruction on earth.
The effects of a nuclear bomb are heat, blast, EMP, and radiation. If you see
a bright flash of light like the sun, where the sun isn't, fall to the
ground! The heat will be over a second. Then there will be two blast waves,
one out going, and one on it's way back. Don't stand up to see what happened
after the first wave; anything that's going to happen will have happened in
two full minutes.

These will be low yield devices and will not level whole cities. If you
live through the heat, blast, and initial burst of radiation, you'll probably
live for a very, very long time. Radiation will not create fifty foot tall
women, or giant ants and grass hoppers the size of tanks. These will be at
the most 1 kiloton bombs; that's the equivalent of 1,000 tons of TNT.

Here's the real deal, flying debris and radiation will kill a lot of
exposed (not all!) people within a half mile of the blast. Under perfect
conditions this is about a half mile circle of death and destruction, but,
when it's done it's done. EMP stands for Electro Magnetic Pulse and it will
fry every electronic device for a good distance, it's impossible to say what
and how far but probably not over a couple of miles from ground zero is a
good guess. Cars, cell phones, computers, ATMs, you name it, all will be out
of order.

There are lots of kinds of radiation, you only need to worry about
three, the others you have lived with for years. You need to worry about
"Ionizing radiation," these are little sub atomic particles that go whizzing
along at the speed of light. They hit individual cells in your body, kill the
nucleus and keep on going. That's how you get radiation poisoning, you have
so many dead cells in your body that the decaying cells poison you.

It's the same as people getting radiation treatments for cancer, only a
bigger area gets radiated. The good news is you don't have to just sit there
and take it, and there's lots you can do rather than panic. First; your skin
will stop alpha particles, a page of a news paper or your clothing will stop
beta particles, you just gotta try and avoid inhaling dust that's
contaminated with atoms that are emitting these things and you'll be
generally safe from them.

Gamma rays are particles that travel like rays (quantum physics makes
my brain hurt) and they create the same damage as alpha and beta particles
only they keep going and kill lots of cells as they go all the way through
your body. It takes a lot to stop these things, lots of dense material, on
the other hand it takes a lot of this to kill you.

Your defense is as always to not panic. Basic hygiene and normal
preparation are your friends. All canned or frozen food is safe to eat. The
radiation poisoning will not effect plants so fruits and vegetables are OK if
there's no dust on em (rinse em off if there is). If you don't have running
water and you need to collect rain water or use water from wherever, just let
it sit for thirty minutes and skim off the water gently from the top. The
dust with the bad stuff in it will settle and the remaining water can be used
for the toilet which will still work if you have a bucket of water to pour in
the tank.

Biological Weapons

Finally there's biological warfare. There's not much to cover here.
Basic personal hygiene and sanitation will take you further than a million
doctors. Wash your hands often, don't share drinks, food, sloppy kisses,
etc., .... with strangers. Keep your garbage can with a tight lid on it,
don't have standing water (like old buckets, ditches, or kiddie pools) laying
around to allow mosquitoes breeding room. This stuff is carried by vectors,
that is bugs, rodents, and contaminated material. If biological warfare is so
easy as the TV makes it sound, why has Saddam Hussein spent twenty years,
millions, and millions of dollars trying to get it right? If you're clean of
person and home you eat well and are active you're gonna live.

Overall preparation for any terrorist attack is the same as you'd take
for a big storm. If you want a gas mask, fine, go get one. I know this stuff
and I'm not getting one and I told my Mom not to bother with one either
(how's that for confidence). We have a week's worth of cash, several days
worth of canned goods and plenty of soap and water. We don't leave stuff out
to attract bugs or rodents so we don't have them.

These people can't conceive a nation this big with this much resources.
These weapons are made to cause panic, terror, and to demoralize. If we don't
run around like sheep they won't use this stuff after they find out it's no
fun. The government is going nuts over this stuff because they have to
protect every inch of America. You've only gotta protect yourself, and by
doing that, you help the country.

Finally, there are millions of caveats to everything I wrote here and
you can think up specific scenarios where my advice isn't the best. This
letter is supposed to help the greatest number of people under the greatest
number of situations. If you don't like my work, don't nit pick, just sit
down and explain chemical, nuclear, and biological warfare in a document
around three pages long yourself. This is how we the people of the United
States can rob these people of their most desired goal, your terror.

SFC Red Thomas (Ret)
Armor Master Gunner
Mesa, AZ

[/ QUOTE ]
 

Daniel Ramsey

Retired Account
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
901
Location
Wasilla, Alaska, \
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Thats an excellant article, I'm glad finally someone here at CPF had the resources or background to post such, I get tired just talking about flashlights! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/yellowlaugh.gif
 

Silviron

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 24, 2001
Messages
2,477
Location
New Mexico, USA
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Good article G-N. There are a few things in it that vary from what my general understanding, training and actual experience indicate, but not by much.

I still think Saddam needs to go, but as much as I hate to give the anti-Americans and Bush-haters any more ammunition, I have to agree that this kind of nonsense is either a misdirected attempt to get the support of the more airheaded people for a war against Iraq, CYA activity on behalf of Tom Ridge & Co. or just more crap from the news agencies trying to get ratings..... Probably a combination of all three.

I do disagree with those that claim that the proof that Saddam doesn't have any of these nasty weapons is that he hasn't used them against us. He knows that if he does, we will utterly obliterate his country, and will track him down and kill him. They are weapons of last resort and revenge, not first strike.

[ QUOTE ]
Why would NK want to send anything to Japan when they can already reach the United States with their Nuclear weapons?!

[/ QUOTE ]

Try a couple of hundred years of absolute antipathy between Koreans and Japanese; It's a ingrained cultural thing. Kim Jong Il could probably get more support from his peasants for nuking then invading Japan than for lobbing a couple of missiles at Los Angeles.

Besides, even as crazy as Kim is, his threats are all about blackmail, not a religion driven jihad against "infidels", nor are they particularly about politics; (even though about 4 years ago he did say that he wanted to reunite into a single Korea, even if he has to slaughter everyone in the south to do it.) Still, Krazy Kim & even his peasants are smart enough to not want to "kill the goose that they hope will lay the golden eggs".
 

Daniel Ramsey

Retired Account
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
901
Location
Wasilla, Alaska, \
Re: Saddams Killer R/C UAV\'s, here in the USA?

Here is a link to R/C Groups of a post I just started, these guys may be willing to add some more info on current technology or news on this subject.
And here is another R/C link.

OR..... <font color="red">I may go down in flames! </font> /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mecry.gif
 

Latest posts

Top