wakibaki
Newly Enlightened
There's a thread over in LEDs about justifying the cost of a particular flashlight.
Justify. Mmmm... That's a difficult word. You mean in terms of global warming? Or between you and your putative Maker when you stand at the pearly gates?
Lots of interesting things in this thread.
There's this other kind of issue floating around in there. Flashlights as tools versus flashlights as jewellery.
Since somebody pointed out that you can pay a great deal for a handmade knife I've had to revise my opinions regarding high-priced flashlights a bit. I can understand somebody wanting a nice knife or tuned gun.
Some very expensive flashlights are not handmade however, they are mass-produced.
I guess the main thrust of the question (about justifying the cost) is: does it represent value for money?
In terms of aesthetics, no-one can judge what a particular appearance or notion of style or intrinsic material quality is worth to anyone else. So this is an intangible.
Many other features of a flashlight are measurable, such as runtime, total light output, size and weight. These 4 are the primary characteristics of a torch. You can boil these down to photons/lb or photons/cu. in. There are some secondary characteristics: - beam angle, peak intensity, ergonomics, colour rendition and more.
When comparing flashlights there is often a lot of discussion about rings in the beam and other 'artifacts'. In day to day use these are largely immaterial. In fact users often seek to put a 'hotspot' (common in incans) on the point of visual focus.
Much play is also made from time to time about reliability issues. If a torch fails, then it can be irritating and inconvenient. For those torches (very few) used in safety critical applications, the answer to reliability problems is regular inspection and competent maintenance. (It's the nut behind the butt) Redundancy also helps if this can be arranged. (2 headlamps min. on most cars!)
It seems to me that there are many lights on the market today whose prices are influenced more by their appeal as jewellery, and perhaps by some other 'big ideas' than their usefulness as tools. A flashlight is, after all, among tools, only slightly more complicated than a hammer.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not disputing anyone's right to buy jewellery, but I do question the advisability of deluding yourself that you have bought it on the basis of its superior functionality.
Further to that, in my opinion (in general) the level of craftsmanship (and value for money) involved does not approach that of custom knife makers and gunsmiths. And on the mass-produced front, just look at how much digital camera you can buy for the price of an expensive torch. It'll have a real lens in it too, with multiple elements!
What do you think?
w
Justify. Mmmm... That's a difficult word. You mean in terms of global warming? Or between you and your putative Maker when you stand at the pearly gates?
Lots of interesting things in this thread.
There's this other kind of issue floating around in there. Flashlights as tools versus flashlights as jewellery.
Since somebody pointed out that you can pay a great deal for a handmade knife I've had to revise my opinions regarding high-priced flashlights a bit. I can understand somebody wanting a nice knife or tuned gun.
Some very expensive flashlights are not handmade however, they are mass-produced.
I guess the main thrust of the question (about justifying the cost) is: does it represent value for money?
In terms of aesthetics, no-one can judge what a particular appearance or notion of style or intrinsic material quality is worth to anyone else. So this is an intangible.
Many other features of a flashlight are measurable, such as runtime, total light output, size and weight. These 4 are the primary characteristics of a torch. You can boil these down to photons/lb or photons/cu. in. There are some secondary characteristics: - beam angle, peak intensity, ergonomics, colour rendition and more.
When comparing flashlights there is often a lot of discussion about rings in the beam and other 'artifacts'. In day to day use these are largely immaterial. In fact users often seek to put a 'hotspot' (common in incans) on the point of visual focus.
Much play is also made from time to time about reliability issues. If a torch fails, then it can be irritating and inconvenient. For those torches (very few) used in safety critical applications, the answer to reliability problems is regular inspection and competent maintenance. (It's the nut behind the butt) Redundancy also helps if this can be arranged. (2 headlamps min. on most cars!)
It seems to me that there are many lights on the market today whose prices are influenced more by their appeal as jewellery, and perhaps by some other 'big ideas' than their usefulness as tools. A flashlight is, after all, among tools, only slightly more complicated than a hammer.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not disputing anyone's right to buy jewellery, but I do question the advisability of deluding yourself that you have bought it on the basis of its superior functionality.
Further to that, in my opinion (in general) the level of craftsmanship (and value for money) involved does not approach that of custom knife makers and gunsmiths. And on the mass-produced front, just look at how much digital camera you can buy for the price of an expensive torch. It'll have a real lens in it too, with multiple elements!
What do you think?
w