Re: Bush \'41 better than Bush \'43?
Amazing... Most of the Bush haters say that he is a stupid, no-class, crude cowboy, Yet others call him "polished".
Some say he is a transparent, lying, con-man and no one supports his policies, Yet he has managed to convince more than half of this world's "democratically" elected leaders to "his" cause, and most of the few that oppose him is because they have their own investments or culpabilities to cover up. (Although I must admit that I don't have any good idea why Russia is opposing it.)
His father IS polished, (if less charismatic than Bush 43)and "connected" and manipulated things behind the scenes for his own profit and that of his fellow "Skull & Bones" club members.
My father was polished, "connected" and manipulated things behind the scenes too (state level, not nationally).
Doesn't mean I'm polished, connected or manipulate things, just because I am his son. (I can't even get a zoning variance from the Village council to build a hidden shed in my back yard yet they gave my neighbor one for a larger and "not hidden" one at the same time., much less get the time of day from the Governor, whom I have known personally for about 25 years, {but thats whole 'nother story}.)
Current President Bush says what he means and means what he says, and that is one thing that liberals can't stand.
Most Bush haters adore clinton; They hate Bush because he started out wealthy and his family and friends MAY make some money because they are "connected". And they hate him because he is mostly conservative, and they hate him because he goes to church and he actually prays.
They hate him because he USED TO BE a drunk, and possibly occasionally used some drugs, yet they adore Teddy Kennedy who is, was and always will be a drunk.
Liberals hate a person who overcomes his / her weaknesses, but love a person who wallows in their weaknesses.
Clinton came into office with almost no money and no assets and left a multi-millionaire, half at direct tax-payer expense and the other half because of "gifts" from friends for whom he was able to do some "favors". But that's OK with the Bush haters.
Look at the Democrat leaders: Many of them are big-investors or on the boards of companies that stand to make big profits directly from government contracts or other governmental decisions. But I have never heard one of you liberals saying anything bad about that. If it fits your agenda, you don't care about opportunism or even outright theft by your own idols.
If you have ONE IOTA of proof that George Bush is manipulating the world for family oil profits, turn that proof over to Larry Klayman at Judicial Watch, and he will have a court case against Bush within the week.