mightysparrow
Enlightened
I've noticed that the flickering of my NovaTac 120P's appears to be worse when using rechargable batteries than when I use primary CR123's. With new, fully charged RCR123's (650 mAH 3.7 volts) as opposed to CR123's the flickering is prolonged and severe- not just a few pulses after changing levels. I charge the RCR123's in a Ultrafire WF-138.
This could have just been a coincidence and is therefore not a real difference, but one evening of experimenting seemed to show a difference. Is this possible?
Is the problem really that the flickering is worse with batteries that are somewhat depleted then with batteries that are fully charged? I was using fully charged RCR123's at the beginning of my experiments last night, and the primary cells I was using were not fully charged. However, the RCR123's seemed to lose their charge and cause "step down" of the output of the lights very quickly. Is this because I was frequently changing the output levels of the lights to see if flickering would result? Would the charge of the cells last longer if I turned on the lights and kept them on one level?
The next question that comes to mind is: would the light perform with less flickering with a different RCR123 cell? Perhaps AW's cells? That should obviously not be the case, as the light should not be designed that way- it should perform acceptably with many different brands of cells. And most of the cells are made by the same few manufacturers, anyway, if I'm not mistaken (I'm not an expert on cells).
NovaTac agreed yesterday to examine the two lights and give them a checkup to see if anything is wrong. I think something is definitely wrong with them, as they should not flicker as badly as they do using ANY decent cell. The flickering is intermittant, but it's severe when it happens. I should be able to use rechargables in them, or I'm not getting what I paid for. The result could be dangerous for some of the consumers the light is advertised for- law enforcement, military, personal defense needs, etc.
Anyone else have similar results with their lights? I want to advise NovaTac of this, if others have had similar findings. Thanks for the help.
This could have just been a coincidence and is therefore not a real difference, but one evening of experimenting seemed to show a difference. Is this possible?
Is the problem really that the flickering is worse with batteries that are somewhat depleted then with batteries that are fully charged? I was using fully charged RCR123's at the beginning of my experiments last night, and the primary cells I was using were not fully charged. However, the RCR123's seemed to lose their charge and cause "step down" of the output of the lights very quickly. Is this because I was frequently changing the output levels of the lights to see if flickering would result? Would the charge of the cells last longer if I turned on the lights and kept them on one level?
The next question that comes to mind is: would the light perform with less flickering with a different RCR123 cell? Perhaps AW's cells? That should obviously not be the case, as the light should not be designed that way- it should perform acceptably with many different brands of cells. And most of the cells are made by the same few manufacturers, anyway, if I'm not mistaken (I'm not an expert on cells).
NovaTac agreed yesterday to examine the two lights and give them a checkup to see if anything is wrong. I think something is definitely wrong with them, as they should not flicker as badly as they do using ANY decent cell. The flickering is intermittant, but it's severe when it happens. I should be able to use rechargables in them, or I'm not getting what I paid for. The result could be dangerous for some of the consumers the light is advertised for- law enforcement, military, personal defense needs, etc.
Anyone else have similar results with their lights? I want to advise NovaTac of this, if others have had similar findings. Thanks for the help.